Page 3 of 5
Re: Plural Marriage
Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2010 8:24 pm
by A-1 (imported)
Paolo wrote: Sat Aug 07, 2010 8:22 pm
What A-1 is really getting at is that he is just plain too old and too worn out to handle more than one woman in his married life at a time. If he could have a harem, there'd be no need for guardian eunuchs, because he'd be dead in a few days!
ROFLMAO! (yeah, I can't find the smilies, I don't do MACs well!)
j/k A-1!
Paolo,
Maybe, but it would take a quorum of Undertakers a MONTH to get the smile off of my face...
Do ya want me to PM the FACEBOOK page to you?
Re: Plural Marriage
Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2010 9:31 pm
by moi621 (imported)
A-1 (imported) wrote: Sat Aug 07, 2010 8:22 pm
oh hell, man, it is just moi... you just don't know how loveable he can be... a bit like a pet alligator or a fish pond full of Piranha...
...nobody IS bashing him. No, not hardly, he just needs "BORED OUT" a little...
BORING my...er...HIS ASS!
moi, you are a RUDE old buggar, you are...
...yes, you are...
I see my role as more Socratean then rude.
I ask the question of plural marriage and it becomes, Hemlock time.
Moi
Pass the Hemlock, just don't bore Moi, Pah-Leeze!
Re: Plural Marriage
Posted: Sun Aug 08, 2010 12:24 am
by Arab Nights (imported)
generic9436 (imported) wrote: Sat Aug 07, 2010 6:35 am
The biggest problem with women is they want to own their man completely...so the women compete to be exclusive
Didn't she come up with a different solution?
Re: Plural Marriage
Posted: Sun Aug 08, 2010 4:00 am
by loveableleopardy (imported)
generic9436 (imported) wrote: Sat Aug 07, 2010 6:35 am
when i was in my 20s i lived in a house with 3 other women for 4 years way out in the countryside
It was just the 4 of us on a farm...we had to provide companionship for each other and satisfy each others needs
it is a lot of work keeping 3 women happy
I will say one thing
I felt totally satisfied as a man for that time
Marriage is all about children and survivor rights
The biggest problem with women is they want to own their man completely...so the women compete to be exclusive
I have fond memories of that time
Just wanted to pay homage to this post. Probably the funniest I've read during my (admittedly short) time on the EA. Hope to hear more from you Generic.
Re: Plural Marriage
Posted: Sun Aug 08, 2010 6:09 am
by A-1 (imported)
moi621 (imported) wrote: Sat Aug 07, 2010 9:31 pm
I see my role as more Socratean then rude.
I ask the question of plural marriage and it becomes, Hemlock time.
Moi
Pass the Hemlock, just don't bore Moi, Pah-Leeze!
Oh no!
...no HEMLOCK for you...
YOU are NOT going to 'get off' THAT easy...
...You may even end up with a 1/2 dozen wives...
...and the part in the previous posts about competition, WELL! they are all going to be competing to OWN your sorry GLUTIMUS MAXIMI!
Re: Plural Marriage
Posted: Sun Aug 08, 2010 8:53 am
by Mac (imported)
O.K.,
......................
A-1 (imported) wrote: Sat Aug 07, 2010 8:16 pm
...with that Mayan Calendar date of 12-21-2012 it is fuck everyone you can before the world blows up...
Wars and rumors of wars...
I am TIRED of it, do ya hear? I want my 1960's back...(or at LEAST the first year of the 1970's...)
I wonder what the next big scare will be. Back in the 1960s it was just "1984" by George Orwell (correction) and nobody really believed that.
Personal computers and video games didn't exist and technology was much simpler. The world was much simpler. You had more personal interaction. However, the Russians were going to get us.
I agree - give us back the 1960s.
Re: Plural Marriage
Posted: Sun Aug 08, 2010 9:49 am
by jemagirl (imported)
Mac (imported) wrote: Sun Aug 08, 2010 8:53 am
I wonder what the next big scare will be. Back in the 1960s it was just "1984" by Orsen Wells and nobody really believed that.
Personal computers and video games didn't exist and technology was much simpler. The world was much simpler. You had more personal interaction. However, the Russians were going to get us.
I agree - give us back the 1960s.
Eeek... Orsen Wells and George Orwell.... the same person? No wonder they were never in the sam place at the same time.
Re: Plural Marriage
Posted: Sun Aug 08, 2010 1:50 pm
by MacTheWolf (imported)
jemagirl (imported) wrote: Sun Aug 08, 2010 9:49 am
Eeek... Orsen Wells and George Orwell.... the same person? No wonder they were never in the sam place at the same time.
A few corrections to be made:
(1) The radio telecast that scared the nation wasn't in the 60's, it was made in 1938 by Orson Wells and it was based on the book, War of the Worlds, written by Howard George Wells.
(2) The novel, 1984, was written by Eric Arthur Blair who used his pen name of George Orwell. The first movie about the totalitarian state came out in 1949 starring Edmund O'Brien, the second was in 1984 and starred John Hurt and Richard Burton.
(3) I don't believe Orson Welles ever met H.G. Wells
Re: Plural Marriage
Posted: Sun Aug 08, 2010 2:52 pm
by Dave (imported)
>>Wikipedia has this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H._G._Wells
On 28 October 1940 H.G. Wells was interviewed by Orson Welles, who two years previous had performed an infamous radio adaptation of The War of the Worlds, on KTSA radio in San Antonio, Texas. In the interview, Wells admitted his surprise at the widespread panic that resulted from the broadcast, but acknowledged his debt to Welles for increasing sales of one of his "more obscure" titles.[39]
Re: Plural Marriage
Posted: Sun Aug 08, 2010 2:58 pm
by DeaconBlues (imported)
MacTheWolf (imported) wrote: Sun Aug 08, 2010 1:50 pm
A few corrections to be made:
(1) The radio telecast...
(3) I don't believe Orson Welles ever met H.G. Wells
Well, that interesting, but not important. What IS important, it that all's well that ends well, and all did in well when H.G. Wells used his ink well.
Well, that's all I have to say... ahem...
