Page 3 of 4

Re: Girl booked for squeezing guy's testicles

Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2009 6:53 pm
by Messalina (imported)
devi (imported) wrote: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:59 pm Actually if she had had squeezed him hard enough he would have seriously wound up spending maybe a few nights in the hospital with major swelling, fever, nausea and so forth along with not being able to work for possibly a week. A
Messalina (imported) wrote: Fri Feb 27, 2009 6:17 pm bsolutely it is domestic abuse.


Hello Dev,

How are you? Thank you, for your support as well. You're absolutely correct re: some of the medical consequence, associated with a severe testicle squeeze. However, even absent that severe squeeze, there can be long term health consequences. Light blows to the testes, even the ones that don't "hurt" can cause scar tissue to form inside. This makes the testicles less effective over time.

I appreciate your opinion and wish you well.

Warm regards,

Messalina

Re: Girl booked for squeezing guy's testicles

Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2009 7:12 pm
by Messalina (imported)
kristoff wrote: Thu Feb 26, 2009 9:09 pm I would suspect that there is a lot more to the story, most likely repeat performances leading to a final confrontation / police, etc. Just a guess. I've seen similar situations in past - often stalking and assault cases - some of them with the woman as the stalker. But, nevertheless, let a guy enjoy his fantasies....

Hello Kristoff,

How are you? I'm sorry, for not being more active til now. However, I'm here now. I should agree with you, based on my extensive experience working with people in violent relationships. I've no problem with people enjoying their fantasies. Trust me, on this! ;)

I would only ask that, people show some sensitivity. That is, their fantasy experience, forced on someone in real life.. could be that person's nightmare. Is that too much too ask??

Thank you, for maintaining this board in such a way, as to permit the free and healthy exchange of ideas and opinions.

Warm regards,

Messalina

Re: Girl booked for squeezing guy's testicles

Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2009 7:32 pm
by IbPervert (imported)
I had a very good friend named Daniel, and at the time him and his male partner seemed very happy (also, i was very young and ignorant) . Much later I found out that one day his partner beat him up so badly that he ended up in the hospital. While at the hospital he found out that his partner gave him AIDS, and six months later he was gone. In a nutshell my friend Daniel was a victim of Gay spousal abuse! So yes, I do know all about spousal abuse But lets face facts!

The human hand on its own is not capable of inflicting extreme damage to the male testicle. Perhaps if she had long finger nails and she had the right grip then the nails could cause physical damage to a nut. Now if she had taken a baseball bat to his balls then yes there is most likely damage that will need a doctors care.

Re: Girl booked for squeezing guy's testicles

Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2009 7:53 pm
by Messalina (imported)
radar (imported) wrote: Fri Feb 27, 2009 5:21 pm No, it's NOT probable cause, but with mandatory arrest laws and feminist indoctrination of both cops and judges, this kind of thing happens all too frequently, and all too often goes well past a simple court hearing. And even if he gets off, once he's been charged, no prosecutor is going to turn around and charge the woman, even if subsequent revelation of the facts would demand it.

See, the problem for the man is, it often doesn't really matter that the charges are ultimately dismissed. He still has all the expenses involved in defending himself, such as a lawyer -- and he absolutely MUST have a lawyer, or he's going to get run over. Then too, dismissal doesn't mean he's not still going to be thought of as an abuser. People tend to automatically believe such accusations, so pervasive is the lie of "only men are violent". Worse, if there's an active feminist group on campus, he's likely to draw protesters who would condemn him regardless of the facts, simply because they want to perpetuate that lie. It is, after all, how they get much of their funding.

There are a lot of double standards at work here.

Hello Radar,

How are you? I can't speak to "Mandatory arrest laws" and the like, I'm not an American. Nor, can I speak to the situation at many Yank Universities. However, I understand the "PC" culture that, underpins much of it. Which, unfortunately is often divourced from common sense.

The "problem", you described for"The man".. only exists for the innocent. AND that, underscores a much larger problem in this society. People tend to believe any accusation, (especially, if it's repeated over and over) made with great "emotion". Many friends have responded to such allegations with; "That's horrible, he should be thrown under the jail!" or X should be done to him. My response is; "That's horrid, IF true".

AND yes, many people are convicted in the "court of public opinion". It seems that, the authourities in Washington have made an arrest in the murder of American Coed, Chandra Levy. Eight years ago, the American media all but accused Congressman, Gary Condit of her murder. I've not read a single retraction or apology!

Thank you, for your input. It's good communicating with people that, can think for themselves.

Warm regard,

Messalina

Re: Girl booked for squeezing guy's testicles

Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2009 10:33 pm
by chilliwilli (imported)
radar (imported) wrote: Thu Feb 26, 2009 4:48 pm Bless you, Messalina, for saying what needs to be understood by thinking people everywhere. I think where some run aground here on an issue like this is when their ballbusting fantasies take over from considered thought about what constitutes fairness and justice. It's one thing if done consensually, but quite another when it's an attack. All too many others swallow the feminist hype that declares (falsely) that 95% of all such violence is committed by men and view such attacks by women as an anomaly, when if fact women actually initiate domestic violence slightly more often, but are rarely reported, more rarely prosecuted, and even more rarely given any meaningful punishment if convicted.

Indeed, what is most unusual about this case is that she was arrested at all. More typically in such cases, the cops arrest the man under the premise that he must have somehow provoked the attack.

got slapped, spit on, kicked, scratched, defending most of the attack...and worst part was the 6 weeks in county...then having to plead to disturbing the peace...then off to defend the country.

chilli-:-\

Re: Girl booked for squeezing guy's testicles

Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2009 11:25 pm
by A-1 (imported)
Oh C'mon!

She comes home and he is in their bed with some little wench, they are both probably naked. She grabs his most prominent part in a fit of rage.

Hell, people have DIED in these sorts of domestic confrontations.

He is lucky and he needs NOT to fuck around on his women.

I STILL SAY the bastard had it coming to him. If he wanted to fuck his 'little friend' the least he could have done was to NOT take her to his old lady's bed.

He is an unfaithful ASSHOLE and he is lucky he didn't get hurt REAL bad. (or killed) You know, like shot or stabbed. The stupid fuck...it would have served him right. It is too common a happenstance for a Darwin award, but it is just as stupid of a trick as those who DO get them pull.

As for the bitch he was caught with, if she was any kind of a person at all, she would not have fucked him in his old lady's bed. Whores have more sense than she did.

I suspect that we have not heard the whole story but I still have little sympathy for idiots who let the WRONG HEAD do all of their thinking... and then sling snot over the consequences.

Cannot believe everything that you read in the papers but Messalina could be right, she could have been a PSYCHO bitch.

Bottom line, NEVER, EVER FUCK somebody who is CRAZIER than YOU are, domestic abuse notwithstanding...

Re: Girl booked for squeezing guy's testicles

Posted: Sat Feb 28, 2009 10:26 pm
by Messalina (imported)
A-1 (imported) wrote: Fri Feb 27, 2009 11:25 pm Oh C'mon!

She comes home and he is in their bed with some little wench, they are both probably naked. She grabs his most prominent part in a fit of rage.

Hell, people have DIED in these sorts of domestic confrontations.

He is lucky and he needs NOT to fuck around on his women.

I STILL SAY the bastard had it coming to him. If he wanted to fuck his 'little friend' the least he could have done was to NOT take her to his old lady's bed.

He is an unfaithful ASSHOLE and he is lucky he didn't get hurt REAL bad. (or killed) You know, like shot or stabbed. The stupid fuck...it would have served him right. It is too common a happenstance for a Darwin award, but it is just as stupid of a trick as those who DO get them pull.

As for the bitch he was caught with, if she was any kind of a person at all, she would not have fucked him in his old lady's bed. Whores have more sense than she did.

I suspect that we have not heard the whole story but I still have little sympathy for idiots who let the WRONG HEAD do all of their thinking... and then sling snot over the consequences.

Cannot believe everything that you read in the papers but Messalina could be right, she could have been a PSYCHO bitch.

Bottom line, NEVER, EVER FUCK somebody who is CRAZIER than YOU are, domestic abuse notwithstanding...

Hello there,

How are you? Why so angry? Also, why all the coarse language? Did you read the article? This was her Exboyfriend. According to said article, theirs had been an "on-again, off-again" relationship, for eighteen months. Additionally, she had shown up at the residence of the exboyfriend and his male roomate, at 3am! Apparently, angry (enraged?) that he hadn't telephoned or texted her, as promised. Also, it's not all that clear (at least to me) who's bed the other woman was in.

I don't know that, I implied the woman is "A PSYCHO bitch". However, I certainly would consider; showing up at the flat of an exboyfriend at three am and causing a disturbance.. rationale behaviour. BTW, the woman in question, (if, you read the officer's report) denies none of this. She claimed "A vague" recollection of events and denies assaulting the man, naturally.

I don't believe in "blaming the victim". If one reads the article and the responding officer's report, it's clear who the victim is. However, if I were to critque the man's actions... I should say, he might've rang for the police straightaway. Rather than admit, an angry (and possibly, emotionally unstable) woman to his residence. Also, what is a 23 year-old doing with a teenager?

Warm regards,

April

Re: Girl booked for squeezing guy's testicles

Posted: Sun Mar 01, 2009 12:57 am
by IbPervert (imported)
Messalina that all pink writing is very hard to read please stick with black. One idea is perhaps you can make a few key words pink. But in order for me to read it I have to copy and paste into notepad.:-\

Re: Girl booked for squeezing guy's testicles

Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2009 10:04 am
by _g (imported)
I have to agree with IbPervert, Messalina all the pink is very hard to read. There is not sufficient contrast. To make maters not good I also have read/green color blindness to some extent and if I had it worst it would be completely illegible.

I do have say from what I've read the guy did not deserve what he got. If a man even touched a women he would be railroaded in the court system. But this lady should have the book thrown at her, assault is assault wither a man or woman did it.

Re: Girl booked for squeezing guy's testicles

Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2009 11:33 am
by IbPervert (imported)
A-1 (imported) wrote: Fri Feb 27, 2009 11:25 pm Oh C'mon!

She comes home and he is in their bed with some little wench, they are both probably naked. She grabs his most prominent part in a fit of rage.

Hell, people have DIED in these sorts of domestic confrontations.

He is lucky and he needs NOT to fuck around on his women.

I STILL SAY the bastard had it coming to him. If he wanted to fuck his 'little friend' the least he could have done was to NOT take her to his old lady's bed.

He is an unfaithful ASSHOLE and he is lucky he didn't get hurt REAL bad. (or killed) You know, like shot or stabbed. The stupid fuck...it would have served him right. It is too common a happenstance for a Darwin award, but it is just as stupid of a trick as those who DO get them pull.

As for the bitch he was caught with, if she was any kind of a person at all, she would not have fucked him in his old lady's bed. Whores have more sense than she did.

I suspect that we have not heard the whole story but I still have little sympathy for idiots who let the WRONG HEAD do all of their thinking... and then sling snot over the consequences.

Cannot believe everything that you read in the papers but Messalina could be right, she could have been a PSYCHO bitch.

Bottom line, NEVER, EVER FUCK somebody who is CRAZIER than YOU are, domestic abuse notwithstanding...

Went back and reread the article...there is nothing in the article that says they were in the "old lady's bed". The ball squeezing bimbo went to his apartment. The man was most likely naked or maybe in some type of undies. The ball squeezing bimbo must have had a key or let in because there was no mention of her being arrested for breaking in. I sincerely doubt that his body stuck around long enough for any real damage to occur to his jewels.

It sounds to me as if the squeezor (legalize for ball squeezing bimbo) might have thought they had a real relationship, and the squeeze (more legalize except for the poor victim) thought just the opposite.

I think someone mentioned an age difference? he is 23 she is 18 geee only five years difference my parents were 7 years apart.

I once had a friend in high school and we would fool around. Neither of us really knew anything about sex so it was more of goofing around. I have always enjoyed having my jewels touched and squeezed and my friend was always afraid he would hurt me and he never made it past a light touch. On the other hand if i ever touched is jewels with my finger he was screaming it hurt, so different male jewels have different pain thresh holds.