• Introduction II

Posted: **Sat Sep 20, 2008 5:40 pm**

...in fact yes. I would like to have seen the two young men who chased me down in their car weilding a gun out the passenger window castrated. And the two that ran over my buddy in the parking lot, crushing his femur and forever disabling him, found and castrated. And the fucker that shoved a knife into my buddies neck, castrated. And the dude who shot his buddy at the table, in the forehead, over a game of cards castrated! And the rapists castrated.

Some of these folks could then be returned to their neighborhoods sending a loader message than a bunch of jail house tats!

"gotta run"

the disgruntled domestic

chilli-

Posted: **Sat Sep 20, 2008 6:23 pm**

Messalina (imported) wrote: Fri Sep 19, 2008 7:00 pm Hello there,

Thank you, for the compliments on my photo. Although, I could stand
datyiasp (imported) wrote: Sat Sep 20, 2008 7:52 am to lose a few pounds off my thighs and bum. lol

M'lina;

Your photo is of a very attractive and shapely woman. All aspects of your body are well balanced, and you need to lose no pounds anywhere on it. You can be killer in any dress you choose to wear!

I am hoping you don't pe

rceive me as blowing smoke.

No lol. Yes WOW!

Thank you.

Hello there,

You're so sweet, thank you. If, only the mirror and scale, were as kind as you! Am I correct ladies?

Warm regards,

Messalina

Posted: **Sun Sep 21, 2008 3:56 am**

[FONT=Comic Sans MS]

Blaise (imported) wrote: Sat Sep 20, 2008 3:45 am It must take guts for women to post on this forum when some of us guys do respond with private messages. I am sorry that happens and sorry when we offend.

Blazer,

Your kind words are appreciated. However, I must state that I have not been subjected to harassment or abuse via PM-ing, with one little exception (and he hasn't been back!) All those to whom I've explained my position to have honored my wishes and for that I thank them.

If someone cares to offer a short comment, a compliment OR complaint, or ask for a BRIEF clarification re any post of mine, then he/she/it may certainly PM in that spirit. I will respond politely.

It's the ongoing correspondence that I must usually reject, especially that which requests the all-too-common "How would you cut off my peepee/testicles/pinky finger/ears/nose hair/kneecaps/phone service/cable service(and God knoweth what else.)"

As ever, your loving Yoli

Posted: **Thu Sep 25, 2008 10:25 am**

Messalina, I'm with you on double orchiectomies for sex offenders. It does help those offenders who realize their problem and want to control it. I know this from personal experience. Keep up the good work.

Posted: **Thu Sep 25, 2008 6:39 pm**

Kangan (imported) wrote: Thu Sep 25, 2008 10:25 am Messalina, I'm with you on double orchiectomies for sex offenders. It does help those offenders who realize their problem and want to control it. I know this from personal experience. Keep up the good work.

Hello "Kagan",

It's good to hear from you and I appreciate your support. Also, I wish to commend you on your frankness. It takes tremendous courage for someone to be so forthright. As I've stated in previous postings, my advocation of bilateral orchiectomies for recidivist sex offenders, is borne from the premise of treatment.. not vindictiveness. Personally, I think the recidivist sex offender should be given the choice; life in prison without the possibility of parole or surgical castration.

Warm regards,

Messalina

Posted: **Thu Sep 25, 2008 6:45 pm**

Messalina (imported) wrote: Thu Sep 25, 2008 6:39 pm Personally, I think the recidivist sex offender should be given the choice; life in prison without the possibility of parole or surgical castration.

I concur. I think that strikes a nice balance between fairness and due punishment. An interesting choice for the offender: freedom without testicles or close confinement with them.

Posted: **Thu Sep 25, 2008 7:00 pm**

I agree with M'lina and Darmandm.

Thank you.

Posted: **Sat Sep 27, 2008 2:41 pm**

Darmandm (imported) wrote: Thu Sep 25, 2008 6:45 pm I concur. I think that strikes a nice balance between fairness and due punishment. An interesting choice for the offender: freedom without testicles or close confinement with them.

Hello Darmandm,

How are you? Thank you, for the support. You've an "interesting" perspective."F

Darmandm (imported) wrote: Thu Sep 25, 2008 6:45 pm reedom without testicles or close confinement with them

", I hadn't though of it that way

It's always good to have another perspective on things. I strive as best I can to be fair whilst, advocating for justice.

Warm regards,

Messalina

Posted: **Sat Sep 27, 2008 2:49 pm**

datyiasp (imported) wrote: Thu Sep 25, 2008 7:00 pm I agree with M'lina and Darmandm.

Thank you.

Hello there,

I appreciate your support as well. It's very difficult to change public policy. The moment policymakers hear the words castration or orchiectomy, they tend to (figuratively, at least) cross their legs and close their ears. So, we advocates for change need all the help, we can find.

Warm regards,

Messalina

Posted: **Mon Sep 29, 2008 4:26 pm**

I am assuming we are speaking of egregious, capital sexual re-offenders here. Once the precedent has been set, time and again a small, rabidly vocal minority is continously wearying themselves trying to increase the scope to include more and more offenses into the law. Anti-abortionists and anti-marijuana advocates are a couple examples.

Some countries put out eyes, cut off hands and other outrageous atrocities in the name of justice. Including clitorectomies and other genital mutilation on women. Barbaric is the main adjective I hear those who decry such activities use.

How many proponents of castrating male sexual offender recidivists favor genital mutilation for female sexual re-offenders also in such a law?

I thought so.......

Most definitely a double standard here, wouldn't you say?

Thank you.

Introduction II

Re: Introduction II

Re: Introduction II

Re: Introduction II

Re: Introduction II

Re: Introduction II

Re: Introduction II

Re: Introduction II

Re: Introduction II

Re: Introduction II

Re: Introduction II