falutennuts (imported) wrote: Mon Apr 07, 2008 9:46 pm I think everyone is not realizing that the base and cords will be constricted past the point of really making a difference what happens past that point. Also they will be numbed to reduce the risk of shock. Nothing is certain but we're not just rushing into it.

Seems like it popular belief that I'll end up in the loony bin but I don't feel that’s the case. I can't stress enough that this isn't a all of a sudden decision and yes I'm prepared for life after. The only difference between what I want and surgical is one extra step. Yeah it adds danger but I don't think it's a guarantee to get me in the loony bin anymore so than just surgical.

I can’t say how much added risk there is but how come it’s ok to do just plain surgical and not this. I have even read a few threads about surgical without any numbing. How is that not a risk for shock?

The threads that discuss these things here have no authentication. They may be factual, AND THEY MAY NOT BE FACTUAL.

EVERY surgery, even those under the best of circumstances on people in the best of health have a degree of risk associated with them. HOWEVER, WHAT YOU ARE DESCRIBING AND PLANNING IS MANY, MANY TIMES MORE DANGEROUS THAN IT HAS TO BE.

We really don't have a reason to tell you this except out of our concern for YOU! In addition, at his site we watch out for each other. It is bad enough to lose a member (no pun intended ) to causes such as cancer or heart trouble or other unavoidable causes, but it is terrible to see somebody die who did not have to die if they had been more careful.

You have came here for advice and you are getting it. We are doing this so that you might benefit from the experience of many who have been down this road or who have seen the direct results of desires and actions such as those you verbalize here in writing.

We know that you will do what you will do. However, we do here what we MUST do and that is to provide information that just might help save a life.

As many are aware, castrations are sometimes medically necessary and cancer is no respector of persons. However, elective castration in so-called "Scenes" such as you describe performed by individuals who are NOT licensed to practice surgery are DANGEROUS for all of those involved.

Please listen and think about this. We are NOT here to judge you or your state of mind. We are trying to HELP you stay alive and healthy.

What I am telling you IS factual. You are risking your life and the Vets' career if you go through with this. THE LEVEL OF RISK IS UNACCEPTABLE compared to the level of risk if competent medical practicioners perform this in a environment designed to deliver medical care to humans. Don't do it this way. Find competent medical practitioners to castrate you. They are out there. It may not be easy, but then neither is dying under necessary circunstances.

OK, first I want to "ditto" A-1's post. Really, honestly and sincerely, I SUPPORT your decision, I fully understand the reasons and agree with you. I am not trying to talk you out of castration, I am honestly encouraging you, but your METHOD is just wrong.

Ask your friend to castrate you, THEN do the crushing. The castration will still be just as real, just as permanent. But so much SAFER.

Don't go doing something so important as your castration, your step into a new and different sexuality (or asexuality) with some silly fetish scene. I know, to others this may sound sort of wierd, but this castration is an IMPORTANT thing, it is your castration, and it is the only one you will ever have. You should be looking for the best and most efficient way, not indulging some fetish here. What you are talking about, crushing then removing, that is like planning a "wedding" around a rape scene. The real castration is just too important to let it become imperilled for this fetish scene thing.

PLEASE, at least think about the METHOD. I (and others here I am sure) want you to be able to "pull this off" without you going to the hospital, without you endangering you life, and without you endangering you friend's license and even her freedom. Would you really want to risk your friend being JAILED, possibly sentenced to prison for this?

From what I understand by reading the posts, is that the Vet will first band the scrotum and also inject some sort of anesthetic. Then she will crush the testicles, and finally remove them surgically. This all sounds good, but I doubt that a proper removal can be done with the band in the way. Your cords need to be stretched before cutting, so I don't see how banding would be a good way to go.

If it was me, I'd want to be numbed first, then the scrotum would be cut open and the testicles extracted. With the cords tied off, the exposed testicles could be destroyed, and then the cords cut, and cauterized, etc.

Banding the entire scrotum and performing the testicle destruction process means damage to the scrotum. Or is she going to cut that off also? either way, I'd be concerned about the stumps of the cords ending up attached to the remains of the scrotum.

I'd like my balls to be removed by a woman with friends watching and filming, but that doesn't mean that I would forsake a sterile surgical setting with a competent urologist, in order to play out my fantasy. (Are there any female Dr. Kimmel's out there?)

I think DeaconBlues and some of the others are right. I'm starting the Med thing first then have them cut off.

Bill

As far as the banding I reread what I wrote and wansn't clear enough. As far as procedure yes I am opting for numbing first off. Then I just confirmed with her that the banding will occur internally. I'm not a medical expert so some of the actual more technical issues such as stretching the cords I'm intrusting to her. She seemed very aware of it. I feel better knowing that you guys are in agreement on that part. So... so far so good still on for the 25th.

Well I am counting the days until the 25th, hoping and praying for the best for you falutennuts. I and everyone else here are REALLY hoping for the best for you. I am really looking forward to reading about the end results from you. GOOD LUCK!

falutennuts (imported) wrote: Sat Apr 12, 2008 10:52 am As far as the banding I reread what I wrote and wansn't clear enough. As far as procedure yes I am opting for numbing first off. Then I just confirmed with her that the banding will occur internally. I'm not a medical expert so some of the actual more technical issues such as stretching the cords I'm intrusting to her. She seemed very aware of it. I feel better knowing that you guys are in agreement on that part. So... so far so good still on for the 25th.

I wish I could be there to watch.

Thanks for the positive thoughts and input. So far so good for the 25th. It's getting close!!!

Well it's after the 25th of April - I wonder if he went through with it? If he did, I hope he's ok.

joanne-f (imported) wrote: Fri May 09, 2008 10:01 pm Well it's after the 25th of April - I wonder if he went through with it? If he did, I hope he's ok.

Very interesting -- no response by the author of this thread for many months now. He is either dead, in jail, or cou;dn't go through with it and is hiding in embarrassment. [big sigh]