Nearly any study can be custom tailored to get any result that the customer desired and paid for.

Men who agree to be circumcised as adults can t represent all men. They already wanted and freely chose circumcision.

So, of course, the many males who are wildly against circumcision were totally excluded from that study.

Fake science !

Plus, males against circumcision, if you cut them, would be very dissatisfied in any survey. That s why no one ever asks them, even if they got cut against their will later in life, no one surveys those men. They know those men would prefer to be uncut.

There is no money in it for anyone, and no controlling other males penises, if everyone let all males decide for themselves at age 18.

cutnbulls2ox (imported) wrote: Mon Mar 26, 2018 12:14 pm Nearly any study can be custom tailored to get any result that the customer desired and paid for.

Men who agree to be circumcised as adults can t represent all men. They already wanted and freely chose circumcision.

So, of course, the many males who are wildly against circumcision were totally excluded from that study.

Fake science !

Plus, males against circumcision, if you cut them, would be very dissatisfied in any survey. That s why no one ever asks them, even if they got cut against their will later in life, no one surveys those men. They know those men would prefer to be uncut.

There is no money in it for anyone, and no controlling other males penises, if everyone let all males decide for themselves at age 18.

I totally agree with you every individual should decide for them self, whether or not to be modified. I read a couple studies which concluded that about 2/3 circumcised men

paring (imported) wrote: Tue Feb 27, 2018 12:57 pm have resentment about their circumcision.

Only when a man has consented to any body modification, he then can accept and enjoy it.

How can any medical institution do a test to compare someone who has been cut all his life and a guy with a glans which was kept covered his whole life. If you cut an adult who's been intact his whole life, his glans is softer with intact nerve ending that the other guy has had healing for(in my case) 60 years., I'm sorry,I don't see any reason to get cut,even though I'm cut other than body mod. a lot of us envy those who were never cut and wish we could look in the mirror and be able to say "I'm happy with my dick" or be able to say " I hate my foreskin and want it cut off". but what can I say, I want my nuts cut off.

I hate it when I'm part of the majority.

cutnbulls2ox (imported) wrote: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:36 am Hahaha, yeah my mind goes and changes course way faster than I can type lol. I m lucky when my big ape hands don t hit multiple keys at the same time.

Sorry, cutnbull2ox, I was referring to paring's post of the Washington Post article, but didn't select the "reply with quote." Your posts are very readable.

Oh, my fault that I assumed that was for me lol. That post of mine right above your post did have a whole jumble of different ideas all thrown into the middle of my post. So your comment made perfect sense to my post right above yours. No big deal at all.

Hey, I m glad to hear my posts aren t too tough to read or follow. So many thoughts to write out and cover in posts on here. I m glad anybody reads mine at all lol !

Freddyjack (imported) wrote: Mon Mar 26, 2018 2:58 pm How can any medical institution do a test to compare someone who has been cut all his life and a guy with a glans which was kept covered his whole life. If you cut an adult who's been intact his whole life, his glans is softer with intact nerve ending that the other guy has had healing for(in my case) 60 years., I'm sorry,I don't see any reason to get cut,even though I'm cut other than body mod. a lot of us envy those who were never cut and wish we could look in the mirror and be able to say "I'm happy with my dick" or be able to say " I hate my foreskin and want it cut off". but what can I say, I want my nuts cut off.

Yeah to me its like comparing eyes with eyelids intact to eyes with the eyelids circumcised off. No way an uncovered glans is as sensative to motion and touch as a bare glans that has been rubbed on clothes for many years. Or take fingernails. That tender nail bed under each nail is wildly sensative. Tear off a man s fingernails painfully, and his bare and exposed nailbeds would grow tough and way less sensative over time as they heal up with tough skin growing over them. Same thing with cutting the penis head to expose it !

Us males with our entire frenulums completely carved and shaved off our penises have unquestionably lost some of the male body s most sensative sexual nerves ! Some men can masterbate using only their frenulums being stroked. I can t do that with zero frenulum. And there s no medical necessity to carve our whole frenulums off at birth. Even torn adult frenulums heal up quickly on their own. There s no way its done except to deprive us men of our most sensative sexual nerves on the whole penis. Just wrecking our sex nerves for nothing ! That s just cruel for no justification. No way a full frenulum doesn t add more sexual pleasure to a male s penis. Of course it does. That s its main function. Its tied to the top of the foreskin to feel pleasure from any motion of the foreskin and to get exposed and rub pleasurably during sex. And there s no way to restore a cut off frenulum. No amount of stretching a cut foreskin to cover the glans can regrow a missing frenulum on a man.

Missed this reply/questions now months old. No, problems with ED and PE remain although sex is non-existent these days.