I wasn't given any choice on my son, his mother got to make the choice, here in the U.S. 25 years ago. It was done so he would look like his older brother.

Another confirmation that much of routine infant circumcision is caused by females getting the final say over fathers combined with a very greedy medical industry negating males choices on male sexual anatomy.

cutnbulls2ox (imported) wrote: Mon Mar 26, 2018 9:38 am Another confirmation that much of routine infant circumcision is caused by females getting the final say over fathers combined with a very greedy medical industry negating males choices on male sexual anatomy.

Mothers who choose to get their sons circumcised, do they have intention to have sex with them ?

No, I m saying that a lot of females behave as though their choice is far more important than their son s and the father s choices, preferences, legal RIGHTS, and decisions on whether to get their sons circumcised at birth. Where is the father s and son s rights carried out on the son s male anatomy ? Its not the mother s body, remember that favorite female rights chant, my body, my rights, constantly cheered by so many females, who then openly violate that same claimed right with their defenseless infant son s body, not her body, for their own whims, not for any medical necessity.

How many American mothers and hospitals and drs let fathers exclusively and permanently decide to cut off ( or let medical staff do it) and modify their daughter s sexual anatomy for his mere whims and completely ignoring the mother s choice and the daughter s choices and all female legal rights in making decisions ? When do fathers alone make that similar cut and mutilate decision that is carried out solely on that female infant s body ?

And then these very same females cry out and condemn and protest any form of female genital mutilation, along with the same corrupt medical industry that advocates and eagerly and profitably carries out routine infant male genital mutilations that clearly violate the father s and male infant s legal rights to please the whims of the mother.

Just look how blatently rotten, corrupt, and unfair this is to males. And how unjustly and unequally males legal rights are treated by totally, knowingly, and intentionally corrupt American judges, laws, and courts.

cutnbulls2ox (imported) wrote: Thu Mar 22, 2018 9:03 am It seems like some men say they don t feel much difference in sexual pleasures after getting circumcised as adults so they can compare sex and masturbation cut and uncut. Some adult circed men claim they lose some sensation and pleasure after getting circed. Seems like sensations in the penis are different in different men.

From what I have read, there doesn't seem to be any scientific evidence that circumcision has any negative impact on sensitivity.

One recent study:

MYTH: Men who are uncircumcised enjoy better sex lives

FALSE: Researchers at the Louisiana State University School of Medicine studied 15 men who underwent circumcision as adults.

They found that there was no statistically significant difference in sex drive, erection, ejaculation, or overall satisfaction.

Also:

...Circumcision is the answer, according to a team of experts at the University of Chicago.

They found the simple op made sex more enjoyable for two thirds of blokes.

The researchers were tasked with looking at a man's sexual pleasure, and function in the bedroom - as well as the risk of injury during sex.

The 362 men taking part were quizzed six and 24 months after having their circumcision.

...The researchers said: "The study confirmed men's long-term satisfaction with the outcome of their voluntary medical male circumcision.

"It improved sexual pleasure and function for most men and significantly decreased coital injuries."

Of the 362 circumcised men taking part, 98 per cent reported being happy with their op.

Most, 95 per cent, told researchers their female partners were satisfied after the procedure.

And, two thirds (67 per cent) reported enjoying sex more post-op, the findings published in The Journal of Sexual Medicine found.

Furthermore, 94 per cent were very satisfied or somewhat satisfied with sex afterwards.

And their sexual function - the ability to do the deed - improved, while the likelihood of injury fell.

Modern medicine is fucking bullshit ! Physicians are only pushers for pharmaceutical companies. They don't want to admit that natural healing is way better their godamned pills. People only pay attention to those who support old traditions but there are plenty of physicians and psychologists who condemn circumcision and very few pay attention to what they are saying. The physicians who brought this barbaric procedure over 150 years ago, have lied to parents, saying that masturbation leads to blindness. Needless to say that parents were scared to death and physicians proposed circumcision to stop boys from masturbating, only to please religious leaders. Since then, circumcision was used to prevent or cure over 50 diseases. All were proven to be false and the lies go on. Nowadays, it's to prevent HIV infection and also to prevent prostate cancer. Once again that's fucking bullshit, if that was true

paring (imported) wrote: Sat Nov 18, 2017 9:46 am USA would have the lowest rate

in the world for these two diseases. The countries who detain the lowest rate of these two diseases are also the countries where the circumcision rate are the lowest. There plenty of adult men who got circumcised to be like others and regretted it because of lost of sensitivity and people don't pay attention to what they say. This bullshit must stop ! Nothing is better than natural.

I just wish all males were left intact and allowed to decide for themselves at age 18. That would make everyone happy !

Anyone wanting control over other males penises and foreskins is clearly in the wrong, parents included.

Its his foreskin, let him decide freely at age 18 ,

YOU CAN ALWAYS CIRCUMCISE LATER, YOU CAN T UNCIRCUMCISE AFTER ITS CUT OFF.