Page 14 of 16

Re: Circumcisions taking more and more skin off down the penis shafts now ?

Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2018 9:26 am
by cutnbulls2ox (imported)
Yeah, it makes sense in concept to circ tight if you re gonna circ at all.

But being cut high and tight as an infant, My erections did hurt in puberty and I sure thought frequently at those times how that dumb ass drs cut me way too far up my shaft and way too tight to let my true erection dimemsions expand to their maximum size. It always feels like my penis body when erect is too big to be able to fit inside my dick skin that was cut off too tight !

Some loose extra foreskin sure would be better when erect. I m sure it prevented my erections for growing as big as they could have grown if I wasn t circumcised and if I had retained lots of excess foreskin to fully erect into.

Re: Circumcisions taking more and more skin off down the penis shafts now ?

Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2018 1:32 am
by Stefan (imported)
I was voluntary circed in December 2016. Here in europe it's not very common, only if there are medical reason for it, but you can do it voluntray, if you pay the bill yourself. I like the result. I didn't feel a big differnce, but that's my personal view.

Re: Circumcisions taking more and more skin off down the penis shafts now ?

Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2018 9:03 am
by cutnbulls2ox (imported)
It seems like some men say they don t feel much difference in sexual pleasures after getting circumcised as adults so they can compare sex and masturbation cut and uncut. Some adult circed men claim they lose some sensation and pleasure after getting circed. Seems like sensations in the penis are different in different men.

It does help us forcibly cut men to think maybe we d be one of the no difference in pleasure men. But there s no way to know with us infant circed men. No way to know how it affected our pleasures or erection sizes. Circumcision does make masturbation more difficult and less pleasurable than a long foreskin surrounding the penis to smoothly stroke up and down with minimum lubrication needed. And all cut male nudists need protection from getting sunburned penis heads that uncut men don t need to worry about. I m sure the more any male goes naked, the more protective and useful a foreskin is to him.

When I ve shared showers and living space with men from other countries where circumcision is rare, my extreme high and tight circ gets a lot of long looks, like crazy Americans really chop their sons dicks back too far. No men say it but their expressions show suprise at seeing so much of my foreskin missing and my entire frenulum precisely carved off my penis and missing for no medical reason.

What do men in other countries think of us forcibly infant circed men ? Do they think Americans are fooled into routine infant circumcision? Or does it seem like religious superstition carried to an extreme by some backward people, or what ?

I m curious what boys and men in cultures that don t circumcise much think and hear about circumcised penises ? And what they hear and think growing up about why some cultures, like Americans, circumcise so many of their males forcibly as infants ? Its has to be known and talked about in other cultures. Especially seeing so many circumcised Americans all over the world for decades.

Re: Circumcisions taking more and more skin off down the penis shafts now ?

Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2018 9:50 pm
by madnomadtoo (imported)
Paragraphs. Paragraphs, my son.

Re: Circumcisions taking more and more skin off down the penis shafts now ?

Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:36 am
by cutnbulls2ox (imported)
Hahaha, yeah my mind goes and changes course way faster than I can type lol. I m lucky when my big ape hands don t hit multiple keys at the same time.

Re: Circumcisions taking more and more skin off down the penis shafts now ?

Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2018 2:44 am
by Chrissym (imported)
I have to admit the idea of circumcision is strange to me. I can appreciate that some people do it for religious reasons but i cant see any other reason to do it? Is anyone pro circumcision?

Re: Circumcisions taking more and more skin off down the penis shafts now ?

Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2018 2:59 am
by Freddyjack (imported)
I was cut a birth, I Wish I wasn't, but nobody asked, I just remember waking up my 3rd day and my foreskin was gone, watch out for thieves in hospitals.

Re: Circumcisions taking more and more skin off down the penis shafts now ?

Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2018 7:18 am
by gay2girl (imported)
Chrissym (imported) wrote: Sun Mar 25, 2018 2:44 am I have to admit the idea of circumcision is strange to me. I can appreciate that some people do it for religious reasons but i cant see any other reason to do it? Is anyone pro circumcision?

Here in the US it's the opposite! Most boys still have it done for health/hygiene reasons.

Re: Circumcisions taking more and more skin off down the penis shafts now ?

Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2018 7:55 am
by cutnbulls2ox (imported)
Studies of men and boys in cultures were males are not circumcised prove how few medical problems uncircumcised penises have and how rarely circs are done to solve any problems,. Even in countries with poor hygiene available, uncirced penises stay healthy.

I believe males are shamed into silence as fathers and females push for it as mothers along with the medical mafia making tons of money on circs and selling foreskins they charge money to cut off.

Most American men are too embarrassed to talk about their own circumcisions and why men get circed at all. Like one buddy said, I m glad I can t remember being circed as an infant. It must have hurt like hell. Can you imagine being cut like thst with no painkillers ?

American women just seem brainwashed into wanting their babies circed. Almost like inventing cutting off all men s outer ears or fingernails and toenails to be cleaner and easier to keep clean without them. And then mothers start insisting their infant boys lose both ears and all fingernails right after birth. And the fathers and other men being called perverts and pedophils if they even question or challenge the removals in their own sons.

And then all males being shamed into not even discussing their ears and fingernails as being perverts or queers or pedophiles if they disuss ears or fingernails.

The medical industry could make tons of money cutting off ears and fingrrnails and claiming its less to clean and maintain for males.

Females could
cutnbulls2ox (imported) wrote: Sun Feb 25, 2018 7:24 pm ask boyfriends and husbands to get
their ears and fingernails removed because they will look better without them or because the females dads and brothers had theirs cut off and she is used to males missing ears and fingernails growing up.

And religions could claim male ears and fingernails should be removed to please God and make a covenant with God that only males need to be cut to create, not any females being cut for God. Somehow only males need this covenant and to get cut to please God.

All completely horseshit and invented to cut and deprive males of healthy and useful, protective body parts, and not removing any parts from females.

Any body parts could be similarly targeted for similar reasons. Its a fraud being encouraged by greedy medical people and perverted religious leaders.

Re: Circumcisions taking more and more skin off down the penis shafts now ?

Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2018 2:47 pm
by sparkey49 (imported)
I am not pro circumcising infants but growing up not knowing any other boys that weren’t except two of my three brothers did have a mental affect on me. I chose to get circumcised at 33.