Hash (imported) wrote: Wed May 11, 2011 2:46 am Thanks, wealth of information and pictures say it all. Your journey has almost ended and I pray you'll finally be at peace with yourself and with the Lord. One thing we know is that at the resurrection, believers will be "like angels" and angels are sexless, Matt. 22:23-32:

That same day the Sadducees, who say there is no resurrection, came to him with a question. “Teacher,” they said, “Moses told us that if a man dies without having children, his brother must marry the widow and raise up offspring for him. Now there were seven brothers among us. The first one married and died, and since he had no children, he left his wife to his brother. The same thing happened to the second and third brother, right on down to the seventh. Finally, the woman died. Now then, at the resurrection, whose wife will she be of the seven, since all of them were married to her?” Jesus replied, “You are in error because you do not know the Scriptures or the power of God. At the resurrection people will neither marry nor be given in marriage; they will be like the angels in heaven. But about the resurrection of the dead—have you not read what God said to you, ‘I am the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob’? He is not the God of the dead but of the living.”

Hash (imported) wrote: Wed May 11, 2011 12:09 pm angels and that quote. The angels must be so pure.

Yes, it's interesting how the corpus cavernosums filled in, I'm guessing the blood solidified. When I had my left testicle removed, I sliced it in half to see what it looked like on the inside. Didn't take any pictures back then, but it was weird looking, really weird

Hash (imported) wrote: Thu May 12, 2011 2:38 am There's a Yahoo Group called, "guyswithnodicks" and a nullo like yourself, named "thunderic2" said this when asked about his penectomy:

"It was all removed at once, although I went back in to get the inside of the penis removed down to the bulb. (They leave that cause it's too easy to damage the prostate if they try to take it out.)"

He's been a nullo for three years. I'm wondering if your surgeon left the penile bulb in you Yoda, but what do you need a prostate for if you no longer have a penis or testicles? I thought the prostate was necessary for erections and for supplying ejaculate fluid? Why not remove the prostate along with the penis?

O.K., here's what I found. There is no reason to keep the prostate if you are a nullo; castrated and penectomized. The prostate plays a role in sexual function and ejaculation, so if you no longer have a penis or testicles, there's no role or use for the prostate. It's also interesting that prostate cancer is stopped or stops advancing at least for awhile, if the testicles are removed. That's why the gold standard for years, in men with prostate cancer, is to cut off their testicles. Castration, which removes the majority of testosterone, prevents prostate cancer from advancing. So a nullo doesn't need it. Eunuchs who don't use HRT also lessen or greatly reduce their chances for prostate cancer because they're castrated. However, because the prostate withers/atrophies from the lack of testosterone, it's not essential to remove it, though every year thousands of prostates are either completely or partially removed. http://www.careflash.com/video/prostate-removal

Uncle Flo (imported) wrote: Thu May 12, 2011 6:18 am Removing the prostate can, and most often does,result in urinary incontinence. This is why most surgeons won't attempt it. --FLO--