Riverwind (imported) wrote: Mon Jun 06, 2011 7:59 pm Moi, you need to forgive them for not letting you in on all there secrets, after all they should have told you everything.

gareth19 (imported) wrote: Mon Jun 06, 2011 6:51 pm A number of people wrote about Kennedy after his death, and at least one stated that Jacqueline Kennedy specifically asked him to suppress certain facts. She was a zealous promoter of the Kennedy legacy, and such uncomfortable facts as the President's medical infirmities might not have squared with the image they were trying to project.

After Custer was killed, a number of unpleasant facts about the dead were suppressed out of "respect" for Custer's widow, and a number of officers made it clear that once Mrs. Custer went to her reward fuller information would be forthcoming. Unfortunately, Mrs. Custer outlived all of the commissioners who investigated the battle and they never got the opportunity to lay blame on Custer's foolhardy behavior.

Similarly, embarrassing details about Scott's Antarctic expedition were suppressed out of respect for his widow. While this behavior now strikes us as irresponsible, it was fairly common at the time. JFK's back problems were irrelevant; the cause of death was a gunshot wound to the head. That these details were not made available in 1963 is only surprising to people who expect to you-tube post-mortem pictures of Heath Ledger or Michael Jackson. There once was a time when the privacy of the dead and their families were respected, if only for a brief time after death.

A-1 (imported) wrote: Mon Jun 06, 2011 9:55 pm River, you know that I am with you on a LOT of things but this JFK assassination, well, it is just TOO obvious and they have lied and lied and lied about it. You can tell...

Riverwind (imported) wrote: Mon Jun 13, 2011 6:11 pm No I don't think so, it was more inline with a religion. Many are found just north of St Louis in Illinois. Look up Cahokia Mounds Collinsville, IL

moi621 (imported) wrote: Mon Jun 13, 2011 6:26 pm That's just a theory. Remember when Neanderthal were a separate extinct lineage and not within us as per today's genome studies. Some as passes for Science can be faith based. I always had faith Neanderthal interbred with moderns. Now Science sez I was right all these decades.

AND

I say, or wonder, if the mounds were about flood shelters.

Riverwind (imported) wrote: Tue Jun 07, 2011 5:03 am Of course I can tell, but is me bitching about it going to give us truth?

OK, I will play along,

WHO Killed JFK,

Possible answers.

LBJ or more likely his wife.

Castro,

Nikita Khrushchev

The Mob

A lone gunman.

CIA

FBI

other

and the Answer is most likely

The Mob.

Why did they fake the autopsy reports.

Think back, this was still 50's thinking even though it was 1963, things did not start changing until the anti war protest of the late 60's and 70's.

They were protecting the image of the Kennedy at the Kennedy's request. They were after all the first family and Joe was still alive and well at that time. MONEY kept things quiet.

How do I come up with this, cold logic.

Does it matter? NO, do I care? Not really. Should I care? NO, (for this reason, does it effect me in any way one way or the other, NO) Is this taking way to much of my time and energy? Absolutely.

moi621 (imported) wrote: Mon Jun 13, 2011 1:13 pm I wonder

Were the ancient mound builders of the Mississippi valley trying to build flood shelters?