i see, i got very interesting point of view here. for you ansers guys

Kietboy

Nothing to add to the thread really, I just wanted to say that's an awesome Dilbert, Krister and I don't know how I missed it.

jane_says (imported) wrote: Sun Dec 09, 2007 8:29 pm Nothing to add to the thread really, I just wanted to say that's an awesome Dilbert, Krister and I don't know how I missed it.

Cant quite make out the date on the strip, but I think it says 11-02-2007. Jesus sent it around, and Paolo imposed it upon me. I like it, though!

It's from November 22, and the web address for it is:

http://www.dilbert.com/comics/dilbert/a ... 71122.html

There are two kinds of eunuchs. The first kind (and most common) is a male with non-functional or absent testicles. The second kind is a male with no external genitalia, such as the traditional eunuch of China or India, or what we would call a "Nullo."

Castration usually involves removal of the testicles, but the term is also used to describe the removal of the penis.

Perhaps Jesus should elaborate on this...?

kristoff wrote: Sun Dec 09, 2007 10:17 pm Cant quite make out the date on the strip, but I think it says 11-02-2007. Jesus sent it around, and Paolo imposed it upon me. I like it, though!

The Cartoon is great but I like the Sister with the Sawsall or was it hedge clippers saying "closer... Closer..."

mrt (imported) wrote: Mon Dec 10, 2007 7:16 pm The Cartoon is great but I like the Sister with the Sawsall or was it hedge clippers saying "closer... Closer..."

PM me your address, and I'll put you on the Xmas card list. heheheh

I don't think removal of the penis leaving the testicles in place would be considered a castration would it? I'm with the guys who classify castration as testicle removal regardless of whether the penis is removed or not. I am not sure what the term should be for a person who has lost his penis but still has his testicles. How about a "frustrate"? Any other offers??D

Personally, I've always held the view that anyone without testes, regardless of whether they are on HRT or not, can consider themselves a eunuch should they wish to do so.

If you still have testes, the issue gets somewhat more cloudy. Should they be non-functional (whether through chem cast or nature), you are more than welcome to identify yourself as a eunuch too. The more, the merrier.

If you've just lost your penis, but still have functional testes, yeah I'd agree that 'frustrate' is about the correct term. "Penectomised" also works, but is a little more cumbersome. Heheh. I dunno, to me that would be a nightmare, but if it works for you, go for it.

I'm on HRT, but without testes, and I still feel free to classify myself as a eunuch, so make of that what you will.

Francis (imported) wrote: Mon Dec 10, 2007 8:37 pm I am not sure what the term should be for a person who has lost his penis

"Emasculate"