Page 2 of 9
Re: Would men prefer to be without their balls?
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 10:27 am
by devi (imported)
Just sing up high sometimes (if you are a male) and see if folks don't look at your crotch.
Re: Would men prefer to be without their balls?
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 11:33 am
by twaddler (imported)
As far as what they look like..Who cares..I have seen uglier humans in a local supermarket.
Tanglong,they had hair on their back....imagine that, and they were naked.
I don't mind a hairy back, but a hairy sack.. Ack. heh..

Dunno, I have weird tastes. I also find underarm hair attractive - for what reason I have no idea. Yao.
Re: Would men prefer to be without their balls?
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 11:50 am
by Mininuts (imported)
twaddler (imported) wrote: Tue Aug 07, 2007 11:33 am
I don't mind a hairy back, but a hairy sack.. Ack. heh..

Dunno, I have weird tastes. I also find underarm hair attractive - for what reason I have no idea. Yao.
yea i love underarm hair and love it to be thick and dark.Love it in the summer when u get to spy guys underarms.Yes hairy genitals are revolting
Re: Would men prefer to be without their balls?
Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2007 1:01 pm
by muff1945 (imported)
i agree with Tanglog, hairless is bliss! if we could just put them up in our bod, life would be simpler.
Re: Would men prefer to be without their balls?
Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2007 9:58 pm
by Mininuts (imported)
Surely if we pushed our testicles up inside and then sewed the sac so there was no room for them to drop back that would keep them inside permanent
Re: Would men prefer to be without their balls?
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 8:59 am
by Mac (imported)
If I had known before puberty that the balls were responsible for all of the undesirable male changes and that those changes would be prevented if the balls didn't exist, I would have tried to find a way to loose them.
Re: Would men prefer to be without their balls?
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 10:01 am
by Mininuts (imported)
Yes I think alot of people,men and women would agree with u.There are rather more downsides to maleness than positives.Love the pic and if that doesnt convince men we look better without then nothin will,lol
Re: Would men prefer to be without their balls?
Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 5:15 am
by texmec (imported)
Agree that most normal men, as Bagoas says, would be horrifed to lose their testicles, the "batteries" of maleness which both cause and maintain manliness and they are literally family jewels.
I wonder, though, if the question were posed to normal guys, if you could castrate other guys, would you? Probably something they wouldn't have normally thought of, but something tells me the answer woud be yes, since males are so competitive, constantly trying to defeat one another in mating rituals, wars, sports games, etc.
Those of us who get gripped with this desire to have our balls removed, though, sometimes are asked to translate into words, in our own minds, and in stories, what this experience is, and knowing the only solution is their removal, might be tempted to say we hate them or they are ugly, etc., but personally, I don't relate to any of that.
Those who castrate, whether in stories or in reality, though, have to have some kind or "resentment" towards testicles, or they would not be removing them. This board has become so paranoid about involving itself openly with "cutters" that those who would like to do it to others usually just lurk and never post that desire other than in their profiles.
The expression of a desire is not illegal and cannot have a site shut down unless perhaps even the fantasies involve minor children, but the constant posting of those who want it done with silence of those who would like to do it throws this whole site constantly out of lopsided balance.
No wonder people "lurk" here and never post. They've been driven off, in a sense, by some permanent posters who are strangely anti-castration, always spinning back to it's dangerous, impossible, can't be done, while other sites openly advocate presently for the legalisation of marijuana, castrations of sex offenders, etc.
If the site wants to protect itself by constantly implying it's all fantasy, than at the very least I'm now reinviting those who have the fantasy of castrating back, openly posting here just as those who freely express their desire to be castrated do.
Come on back lurker castrators.
Re: Would men prefer to be without their balls?
Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 9:44 am
by Mininuts (imported)
I think most straight guys would willingly castrate other men as so often happens in wars.Men dont view other mens privates as something nice to look at and generally think any other but their own is repulsive.It as you say would also be about reducing competition in the mating game and I also think they would also target gay men for this treatment as most straight men are deep down scared of homosexuality.
I dont know why people would not post their fantasy of castrating men as thats what it is ,a fantasy.
Re: Would men prefer to be without their balls?
Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 10:31 am
by Paolo
It's common knowledge for my male friends and family that I have had, and to some extent still do, problems with unusual tenderness and pain in my testicles/cords. It ALWAYS evokes a sense of shock and utter panic when the subject of corrective surgery, even shy of castration, is brought up. Just the idea of going in a severing some nerves sends the male-folk clutching their "tricky-bits" and squirming, if not running away from the conversation. (Got that new phrase from an Australian TV show the other day. I rather like it.)
I've never posed the question of whether it would be OK to have an alternative build, say, with no dangling bits out there. It's pretty much a moot point though. Men are used to what they have, and it's difficult for the average male, I think, the wrap his mind around the concept of a redesign to the works.
Then again, we're probably not all "average males" here either. But just because we can comprehend it, doesn't mean we could easily explain nor "sell" it.
The same revulsion and fear comes up with the boys, also. All of 'mine' have been educated about regularly checking for swellings, pains, lumps, anything out of the ordinary. The idea of something going wrong down there is an often discussed subject, as most boys past the age of 8 or so begin to become fixated upon their goodies down there. We also have this discussion regularly at ballgames, where the use of a cup is often mandatory. Teenage boys and most of the pre-teens are seemingly just as appalled by the idea of testicular injury/surgery/cancer as their older counterparts are.
My middle Godson, at age 13, declared that he'd rather die than have his "nuts cut on."
To date, I've only heard ONE of the boys, age almost 10 when he said it, say that he'd rather have his '"accessories" just snipped off and outta the way' (his own words) because all they do is get in his way and get hurt. You can imagine the look on my face, I'm sure. Fortunately, this one of my usual charges, as in, "Here, take my kid home with you for the day, bring him back when you're done with him."
Don't think WE didn't have a serious conversation about just why boys are built like boys are, and what the testicles begin to do around age 12, give or take a couple of years!
All joking aside, I really hope I was able to get the idea into his head that at age 10, he's probably going to WANT those "accessories" for later use. Given the looks and responses I got, though, I'm not so sure. This is one I'll be keeping a close eye on and having more serious chats with Mother as time passes. After all, he's approaching the statistical age where the castration ideology usually forms up.
So, no, I think is the answer for the bulk of the male population.