Dear Genderless,

Happy to hear you expect to be on estrogen therapy after castration is achieved. I expected to be a non-HRT eunuch but life without hormones is hard. Our bodies run best with some sort of hormones in them, so I've chosen estrogen.

Have you considered the possibility that you are transgendered, and that that is the reason for your cross-gender desires?

Terry/Terri

Naw, I'm too male for that. I'm more eccentric extreme.

genderless (imported) wrote: Tue Apr 17, 2007 4:16 pm Naw, I'm too male for that. I'm more eccentric extreme.

I'm all for the smooth look. But if you are truly male, why would you want to lose your penis? I don't know about you, but I prefer to pee standing up.

Kangan (imported) wrote: Wed Apr 18, 2007 8:15 am I'm all for the smooth look. But if you are truly male, why would you want to lose your penis? I don't know about you, but I prefer to pee standing up.

"Too male for that" doesn't imply "truly male".

Kangan (imported) wrote: Fri Apr 13, 2007 1:58 pm Just because you hate you

joydivision_27 (imported) wrote: Fri Apr 13, 2007 7:46 pm r genitals doesn't mean that God does too.

Beautifully put.

Sometimes it is very difficult to discern between God and a fetish.

And I mean no disrespect to either you or God by that comment.

We humans are extremely complicated beigns. I personally see nothing wrong with personal beliefs, fixations, or fetishes.

My only objections come when any of the above harm oneself or others.

If you want to be genderless -- by all means please pursue it, but with throughtful care.

The Bible too, is complicated. On one hand it encourages fruitful multiplication (ironic in m,y case, because I am a fruit -- which has thus far impeded multiplication -- just can't seem to get pregnant, dammit!).

On another hand, it admonishes "If your eye offends you, pluck it out."

In this case 'offend' means 'to cause one to sin.'

So .... if thine genitals causeth thee to s

in -- then pluck them off.

But safely, please .......

Whoa, there...

Sex as SIN?

...this is the GRAND LIE that old assholes who never got enough of it {SEX} in their lives and in their youth visit upon the young to control them. Also, you cannot have a young person getting more sex than an old person.

Unless of course, they are having it with an old person.

I have heard enough of this fucking horseshit in the last 45 years or so...

...but BEWARE. This attitude that I have just voiced basically CAUSED the AIDS epidemic of the 1980's which gave old bastards even MORE fuel for the fire...

HAve you seen the commercial on television of the young girl with HUGE herpes sores around her mouth? This is blamed on ORAL sex. It should have been blamed on a god-damned virus.

...see how fucked-up things are?

...still blaming the victim for the illness...

A-1 (imported) wrote: Sun Apr 22, 2007 11:20 am Sex as SIN?

...this is the GRAND LIE that old assholes who never got enough of it {SEX} in their lives and in their youth visit upon the young to control them. Also, you cannot have a young person getting more sex than an old person.

Unless of course, they are having it with an old person.

I have heard enough of this fucking horseshit in the last 45 years or so...

...but BEWARE. This attitude that I have just voiced basically CAUSED the AIDS epidemic of the 1980's which gave old bastards even MORE fuel for the fire...

HAve you seen the commercial on television of the young girl with HUGE herpes sores around her mouth? This is blamed on ORAL sex. It should have been blamed on a god-damned virus.

...see how fucked-up things are?

...still blaming the victim for the illness...

Sexual ignorance promotes sexual disease.

I am not taking exception to your right to interpret the Bible in your own manner. Also, I am not taking exception to your right to make decisions regarding body modifications for whatever reason. However, interpretation of the Bible in order to support or justify actions in modern times presents some practical problems. The bible has been translated numerous times from various languages. Those translations were subject to many interpretations, modifications, variations and mistranslations over the centuries. A good analogy would be the child's game "Whisper Down the Lane." My point is that taking the Bible literally is generally not good idea.

I think I did mention I felt it was a calling, not just based on the bible. I'm not planning to build an ark any time soon either.

Kangan (imported) wrote: Wed Apr 18, 2007 8:15 am but I prefer to pee standing up....

* I prefer to sit down, but i have no intention of saying goodbyes to my part down there.......*

well in the bible all sex outside marriage is sinful, not sex itself......

I recently watched a documentary about the history and origins of the Bible. In one part of the program, they discussed the various translations of the original works. One of the most interesting things was the assertion by an "expert" that "marriage" did not exist in biblical times. He insists that any phrases such as "He took unto himself a wife." would really have been written as "He took unto himself a concubine."