Paolo wrote: Fri Dec 01, 2006 7:16 am "If I did it, here's how it happened."

That's the original title, I read, but they shortened it.

Semantically, that's a confession.

He should have called it, "IF I did it, here's how I WOULD have done it."

Personally, I think he's as guilty as the calorie count in a double-fudge layer cake with 1" thick frosting!

Yeah, How about shortening it to ...

"I did it, here's how" ...except that we already know the story...

...I didn't like the ending, either...:shakemitk

OK, I know I am going to take loads of crap for this but, if you followed all of the trial and everything that went on, maybe you like I would have come to the same decision.

The Cops, corners office, prosecution, etc did so many things wrong from the very start nobody could have been found guilty of anything, let alone OJ for murder. That’s right sports fans; in our system of government you are innocent until proved guilty beyond a shadow of doubt. Had I been on that jury I would have said not guilty and would have no problem with sleeping.

I would be more than happy to go over everything with you on this one and maybe at the end you like I would come to the same decision, NOT GUILTY.

Having said that, did he murder his wife, 98% most likely, but you must be 100% sure, and there is that 2% that I am still not sure about. But after the cops, labs, corners office and everybody else finished fucking with the evidence to the point that they had none, that’s right, NONE. He got the only decision that could be given and had he been found guilty he would have won freedom because the trial would have been made a miss trial.

After the murder trial they got an area of LA that is all white to hear the civil trial. Right, come now. That was a bigger joke then the trial itself. And out of all of this both lawyers have written books, made money, why shouldn't OJ have that same right?

Where do I come up with all of this, well I was out of work and watched it every day on TV, and I can tell you about 4 weeks in after the prosecution had presented most of its evidence I had already made up my mind. anybody who was watching it would come up with the same thing. Remember the news service painted a different picture then what took place in the court. I found the coverage to be bias and very one sided, and from the comments here I see the effect it had.

I keep coming back to the same thing; with the evidence presented nobody could have been found guilty of anything.

River