I have some comments on your post:
John W. (imported) wrote: Sun May 29, 2005 5:59 pm I'm one - a prepubertal eunuchoid, now middle-aged.
Do you feel comfortable elaborating a bit on your condition? Is it Kallmann's, Kleinfelter or anything like that? Did you adress these issues with a doctor, and how come you 'escaped' the pressure of HRT? Most of the similar cases I've heard of the doctors either forced or scared the person into HRT.
John W. (imported) wrote: Sun May 29, 2005 5:59 pm I sing soprano, including in a church choir, this being my natural singing and speaking voice (encompassing the standard C' - C''' soprano range plus a few notes either side), without any falsetto.
How would you reflect on the strenght of your soprano voice as opposed to an average female? What is your absolute lowest sustainble note?
John W. (imported) wrote: Sun May 29, 2005 5:59 pm In fact, my voice is exactly the same now as it was when I was 11 or 12
By exactly, do you mean that you sound the same way as you did as a boy?
John W. (imported) wrote: Sun May 29, 2005 5:59 pm I have never had to shave, although I have some female-type pubic hair which may be accounted for by adrenal androgens, with no perceptible loss of scalp hair. My testicles very small and soft, clearly non-functioning.
That would depend on wether you have a hypo -or hypergonadotropic hypogonadism. If you have HH adrenal glands are unlikely to become overactive, pointing toward remaining function of the testes.
John W. (imported) wrote: Sun May 29, 2005 5:59 pm I am not unusually tall, being about 1.72 m. tall (about 5ft 8"), although what is unusual about it is that I reached my final adult height at the age of only 12, and have not grown at all since then.
Well, John, it's more than that - it's simply amazing! I mean, you must have been gigantic as a child. At 11 I was 1.55m and was tallest in my class, and there we did not have dwarfs. In fact, you was 28cm taller than the average for given age! If you managed to spurt that much since birth how come you ceased growing altogether? In animal models, hypogonadism extends the growth period by 40-60% or so; in humans up to 200%. Did anything happened to you at that time?
John W. (imported) wrote: Sun May 29, 2005 5:59 pm As for eyebrows and their ridges, I have, in fact, fairly prominent eyebrows and eyebrow ridges, contrary to what is stated. But I am somewhat obese, with some gynecomastia which is easily concealed, but it does not affect my arms or legs.
That might not be exceptional if you had prominent eyebrows as a child. Or did they grow during adolescense?
John W. (imported) wrote: Sun May 29, 2005 5:59 pm I read somewhere that "eunuchoid skeletal characteristics" are upper/lower body length ratio of less than 1, and total arm span more than 5 cm more than height. I am within these eunuchoid ranges by small margins.
Yes, but also that the epyphyseal bones are those with longest growth resulting in long legs and shorter spine. The hips tend to be wider as well.
John W. (imported) wrote: Sun May 29, 2005 5:59 pm As for sexual orientation, I find that I can get along perfectly well without sex of any sort.
However, do you think you can still function sexually?
John W. (imported) wrote: Sun May 29, 2005 5:59 pm As for HRT, perish the thought! Testosterone is a thoroughly evil substance, causing liver and prostate cancers among others, as well as baldness.
You're right about liver cancer; it seems it has a special interaction on the liver tissue resulting in increased incidences of carcinoma and cysts. Men are twice as likely as women to get liver cancer (excluding alcoholism), and mice models shows castrates do not develop either cysts or cancer in the area.
John W. (imported) wrote: Sun May 29, 2005 5:59 pm So-called "normal" (I call them just plain "average") male secondary sexual characteristics are a terrible disfigurement. Besides, there are other things that can be taken for possible osteoporosis; a diet high in calcium and vitamin D is usually sufficient, along with reasonable exercise and sunlight exposure.
Have you done, or plan to do a BMD scan?
Personally, I never felt comfortable with puberty either. The changes it engendered upon my chemistry were rampant and brutal. Most of the negatives I acquaried by that time decreased after castration, especially in regards to mentality, skin quality and facial features.
As re: osteoporosis - I don't think castrati were at increased risk. Studies done on rats show that only older adult mice exhibited bone loss after castration link (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/quer ... t=Abstract). Pre-pubertal castrates expereinced a slower, but nonetheless progressive increase in BMD up to old age, exceeding intact individuals in positive bone formation/turnover ratio (due to prolonged growth). It seems that once your bone metabolism isn't dependable on sex hormones it manages perfectly well without (as in pre-pubertal children). Castrati had less BMD yet their bones were more elastic and thus healthier, in my opinion.
For example Tandler and Grosz et al. studied many skopzy, some were up to 90 years old and none were mentioned being disabled. This holds true for the eunuchs in the Chinese and Ottoman studies. Lower bone density doesn't = osteoporosis, for instance children and vegetarians have low BMD but actually have more elastic (children) and healthy (vegetarians) bones. Neither the observed kyphosis in Chinese study is neccesary indicative of osteoporosis as it's also encountered in children and young adults, and can be a result of extended growth with little excersize, sedetary lifestyle, or many other causes (ie unrelated to hypogonadism). Up to date, none of the existing scientific/anecdotal research on castrati/eunuchs of the past revealed yet a single case of a fracture.
http://www.newstarget.com/006358.html
http://orthoinfo.aaos.org/fact/thr_repo ... gory=Spine
10 year olds specificly have 50-60% of adult BMD - yet their bones are perfectly healthy and strong without sex hormones. Menopausal women with similar percentage would already develop severe osteoporosis, as their bones are more calcified and hardened (due to early influence of estrogens), and thus easier to brake later in life.
http://www.merck.com/mmhe/sec05/ch062/ch062a.html
Fractures in children are often treated differently than those in adults because bones in children are smaller, more flexible and less brittle, and most importantly, still growing.
That's also why we never hear of castrati with broken bones!