...the problem with this is it is not reversable.

Now, if you REALLY want to know what it would be like, then do this.

Hve the whole package removed from your crotch, but just in case you change your mind have it sewn back on in your left arm-pit. (Use the RIGHT arm-pit if you are left handed.)

Have the surgeon attach the subclavian artery and vein to your penis and ball's blood vessels.

Then, wear a lot of loose sweatshirts. If it's in the summertime use an ace bandage to keep your arm secured to your torso and tell everyone that you have an orthopedic problem.

If you like the smooth crotch look then you can cut the stuff off later for good but if you don't then you can have it put back in your crotch after the trial period.

...And in the mean-time watch raising that arm to wave bye. Somebody will think that you are propositioning them!

A-1

I had been wondering how I was going "to pull all this off."

No, Salami, the only pics of me on-line these days, that identify with me being a eunuch, are the ones at the two BME sites listed in my .sig down below (and of course the one on the left, which is from the IAM.BMEzine.com site). (There are many other pics of me on-line, but there is no connection in those to me as a eunuch.)

There used to be some more pics of me in the nullo section of BME Extreme! but those were removed 'round the end of September, 2001 because of a disagreement, and have not been put back up (I did let Shannon know he could put those images back in Extreme! but that has not happened).

The images that were in Extreme! were from original snapshots taken by my wife and physically mailed to Shannon in 1995. I no longer have the prints or negatives. The only prints of those negatives that I am aware of are in Shannon's possession.

Any public pics obviously of a eunuch that are found elsewhere on the 'Net are either illegally copied from one of those two sites listed in my .sig or are not of me. I do have several sites that have private pics, but the aren't discussed here since they are not public.

Hopefully that made some sense and clarified some information.

Take care,

http://home.earthlink.net/~zip98498/tomsig01.gif

Zorq (imported) wrote: Thu Dec 12, 2002 4:24 pm I would like to know about the difference between being simply castrated and having all removed. If one still has a penis, is it possible and convenient to simply push it back to get it out of the way and having a no-bulge look? Or even when wearing a swimsuit or will the stupid little thing always be visible?

I have been taking Evanesce (pills that contain herbal estrogens and testosterone blockers) since... the beginning of October, if I remember correctly.

I don't get erections much anymore. However, I still find that my penis feels in an awkward position in my pants sometimes, so I instinctively readjust it.

I don't fold my penis out of the way because I have testicles and those would get in the way. I also think folding it out of the way is tedious because I'd have to re-do it each time I go to the bathroom.

So, I think there definitely is a difference between having a penis and having no penis.

@happousai

well, as far as i know, without scrotum the penis tends do point mor downwards and being small and soft it can be hidden easily. think of ts-girls who didn't have surgery. being clothed you could't tell if they still have it or not.