Page 2 of 3
Re: Something I have not seen done yet
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2003 8:31 am
by yankee masha (imported)
I did want to say that the story idea is great overall and really has a lot to it in reality, which makes it even hotter for me. And the fact that straight guys are more likely into this makes it even more erotic especially if the het is turned over and gets what he gives.
As for the attack on the prostate, I think going too far even in the fantasy pushes it over the edge (for me). It is much more erotic if the fear of being destroyed is the focus of ths story, rather than the completion of it. Don't know why it just thas more bite for me -- maybe to return again and fight another day? Make it a long term grudge match between two straight guys or one gay and one straight. Sor of like the pankration in ancient Greek Olympics.
In a fantasy one allows a lot of poeic license too so the reality of "can this really happen?" doesn't have to apply to make a super hot story. I really have to say that you have come up with something that has lain dormant in my erotic imaginings for a long time ever since I heard of these wrestling clubs where the "Willing victims" get aructioned, and used brutally by their opponents then by their buyers.
Re: Something I have not seen done yet
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2003 8:04 pm
by Laryagar (imported)
My previous post was to clarify to possible readers that this story was not to be taken literally and everything happening in it was not to be considered completely factual.
I was planning on leaving the first two matches with no destruction, just humilation and defeat. The third match was the one described at the beginning of this post. I was planning on the guy that ultimately loses was going to have the semen fucked out of his body and his prostate attacked as described by the weapon the opponent has. Part of the end of that match I planned for the loser to have a final cum that is filled with blood. But, technically it is left in the air. I was debating on leaving it open or was going to have the loser taken to a local private hospital that the arena has a contract with to fix him up. At this point it is a question of divulging that the loser was repaired in time and was recovering or have it being a lost cause.
Considering the nature of this board I had considered the destruction permanent but my inclination is to allow him a recovery...perhaps as part of the surgery and reconstruction he gains a strength or weakness related to his prostate...maybe his gland is larger now or somehow changed to be more like our brown haired friend in match two. Or, like our brown haired friend it is found his newfound prostate is much more sensitive now. Or as a side effect of the nerve damage caused by the incident he has a permanent erection. With the increased sensitivity he would have to be more careful about being put into a losing situation since his body will have even stronger reactions and he will have lost the ability to fight while impaled or touched there.
I like to see situations where the guy discovers something about himself to completely change his outlook...and his subsequent reactions. A total top hetero guy finds out he is a natural bottom...after the initial shock of how much his body betrayed and humiliated him to his friends and whomever is in the audience does he somehow become subverted into follow his body's lead or does he try to resist it as much as possible and tries to prevent it from happening again...and what happens when it does.
Laryagar
Re: Something I have not seen done yet
Posted: Tue Apr 01, 2003 6:40 am
by yankee masha (imported)
Yeah, everything you said is clearly understood. Your whole approach is intriguing and this is shaping up into a really great, dark story. In some ways it is like those martial arts movies with jean-Claude Van Damme, where what is going on is impossible in many ways, but is set in a real, but less familiar place, like Hong kong. This enables the writer to make things happen without raising doubts as to believability. Then we're free to let go with immersing ourselves into the story and going with it. That is the point of fiction -- the writer can maek anything happen jsut by writing it. I think what you have done is create a world where everything you choose to write is feasible and therefore believable so you don't need to get hung up on whether or not it can happen. So far it works for me. I hae to also say he originality of your basic idea is really erotic too. I think the whoel thing for straight guys about getting fucked up the ass is the fear that their prostate is under attack, also that they have to respond erotically even if they don't want to.
Re: Something I have not seen done yet
Posted: Tue Apr 01, 2003 8:09 am
by Laryagar (imported)
I am not sure if really any of the contestants are in fear of their prostate being attacked, most do not know it is there or its possible effects.
All they know is the fear of being topped by someone in such a way in a public arena. The rest of the forced ejaculations are to be more revelations of their own weaknesses in this regard.
Laryagar
Re: Something I have not seen done yet
Posted: Tue Apr 01, 2003 9:52 am
by yankee masha (imported)
Sounds good whatever way it happens. The thing that makes it interesting is having it run through your imagination. Anything i have written is only meant as suggestions or ideas.
Re: Something I have not seen done yet
Posted: Tue Apr 01, 2003 7:23 pm
by Laryagar (imported)
I have not worked myself up to completing the second match yet...not enough time lately to sit and write it from the top of my head. Will probably leave off from our blond friend pulling out and going back to the third guy...our first loser. I just had an idea for an interesting twist...actually a double twist to go along with the end of that match. Then I may sit down and describe the third match from its beginning. I had written the basic ending of match 3 but maybe I can describe it better or at least more completely.
Sometime I will have to get a compilation of these bits and make it a whole story. What I hope for is others to get ideas from this story and maybe write other stories in this little universe.
I do plan to flesh it out with names to these descriptions and will try to start it up from a more benign startup...I will use two non-competing attendees to the matches as a lead-in for the matches. I will try to keep to an omniscient perspective, kind of like a roving camera. I have seen some stories that are entirely from one person's perspective but in this story you need to get up close to the action and sometimes have to know things about the contestants that the casual observer would not know.
For example, in match two the three contestant are: the blond friend and the brown haired friend are both named Dan. I will likely attach last name initials to distinguish them. The third guy is named Kevin. In the first match the contestants are named Gerald and Tim. In the third match the contestants are James and Mark.
I may change the Tim to something else...not sure.
In future stories I may decide they throw various objects into the ring to be used by the contestants. The contestants do not have to use them, just added options that may or may not improve their score.
Laryagar
Re: Something I have not seen done yet
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2003 9:25 am
by yankee masha (imported)
I hope you change the name from Tim to Tom, which is my name and make him win the match! LOL
Re: Something I have not seen done yet
Posted: Sat Feb 28, 2004 8:18 am
by shadows_rv (imported)
Laryagar,
This storyline is simply awesome. I checked the archive board, and didn't find you out there under authors. Have you given this up? If you were to just take these postings and put them out as the story ... WHEW!! I check back every couple of weeks just to refresh my memory

and to see if you've granted a wish ...
I've tried to sit down and write something up ... My fantasy world rocks, but to actually put it to paper ... Just don't have that creative flair, I guess.
Hopefully you are still part of the board, and you see this posting and think about continuing your storyline. (As I've been typing this up, there is this little smiley over here

.... Just going right at it ... I think it compliments this thread!!

Re: Something I have not seen done yet
Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2004 2:22 am
by Laryagar (imported)
I am still around...I actually still have that story in my head....I even fleshed it out a bit...just need to sit down and write it.
Right now I am thinking along the lines of a different, shorter story.
Consider it a demonstration of new techniques for interrogation and execution of prisoners for the military.
Imagine a research facility that is in need of volunteers to perform in a demonstration. An advertisement is placed for male models to take part in an audition. A few dozen show up and they are put through a mock-up of an audition, first round is standard interview questions that try to pick out those with no truly close friends or family. Then those are put into the next round with clothed and nude photo shoots that further reduce them down to the last few that are placed in video shoots with them masturbating.
Their orientation is noted and they try to eliminate any homosexuals or more adventurous heterosexuals. Finally they reduce it down to three candidates.
The three of them sign health waivers and told that they were chosen to take part in a video demonstration for some important clients. They are then escorted from a simple small office to a large ampitheater with curtains along all the walls and three cubicles in the center. The cubicles are 10 foot by 10 foot each and 10 feet high and the walls are made of opaque curtains.
The three men are escorted into their respective cubicles and prepared.
There is some comments from the men about them being naked and restrained, but they are told that it is to keep the results of the tests pure by making sure they stay in a specific position. While this is going on, the curtains at the sides of the room raise and there is an audience of a few hundred watching with monitors strategically positioned. The audience is composed of men and women in military, scientific, and corporate clothes.
Finally, the assistants leave their respective cubicles and signal they are ready. The Director of the facility walks out to the first cubicle and the curtain walls to it begin to fall into slots in the floor. The man in the first cubicle starts thrashing when he sees all the people in the audience and yells to be released. He has dark brown curly hair with blue eyes and is about 5' 8" with a solid wrestler's build. He is introduced simply as Subject A and is introduced as a 21 year old stock boy at a supermarket. He is strapped to a gynecological type chair with clear acrylic bands so he is fully visible to the cameras and audience. He is soft but appears to have normal sized genitals. The director described Subject A as a control case for the primary device and this particular subject was chosen because he showed the greatest degree of shyness and was the most difficult to become aroused during the video tests they ran.
By this time Subject A stopped trying to escape when he realized he could not get out and simply closed his eyes so he would not see everyone. The director continued to the next cubicle that also started lowering its curtains. Subjects B and C already heard what was happening and even noticed the monitors suspended above them so they could see what was going on, so Subject B was a lot calmer when the walls came down. Subject B is dark blond blue eyed with a military style buzz cut and about 6 feet tall, his build was that of a swimmer's with a tapered waist and broad shoulders. He was strapped down with similar restraints as Subject A except to a white table that split open at the waist area so each leg would spread open based on need. The director explained the reason for Subject B's qualifications was due to the high volume of seminal fluids and sperm he produced in the video. He had the largest volume and his testicles had the largest mass. Indeed, even soft his penis was fairly large and his testicles looked very full and hung down a few inches.
When the Director reached the third cubicle and it was exposed it showed Subject C. Subject C was 6' 4" and had black hair, black eyes and pure white skin. He has a lean build and face, similar to some rock stars. The director describes the choosing of this contestant was due partially to his large penis but more so for his low hanging scrotum and fairly large testicles. The biggest reason was the large urethra he has and the large amount of precum he produced during the video. Subject C is strapped down to a similar table as Subject B and his testicles hang a good 6 inches below his spread legs and has an penis that is 6 inches soft.
The Director walked away from Subject C and said that they did take liberties in the choosing to find the most ideal subjects for the demonstration and that while it may not mirror the results in the field uses it would at least show the possibilities of what the applications of the device can be used for.
He nods to the assistants waiting and they approach their respective cubicles where small podiums rise out of the floor with some equipment sitting on them, a box shaped devices with a few wires coming out of it. All of them pick up a device shaped like a cycliner and 6 inches long 2 inches in diameter with rounded tip and dips in at the base. There is an indentation approximately 4 inches up the shaft of the device, roughly one and a half inches in diameter. The assistants approach the subjects and quickly thrust the devices in their rectums with the indentation facing up.
All the subjects cry out and slowly adjust to the feeling of those invading devices. The devices are attached to the box on the stand and the assistants each bring out another attachment, each one different. Subject A's attaches around base of the glans of his penis with another piece running from the bottom of his penis and over the entrace to the urethra to the top part of his glans. Another piece of strapping is attached to the part going over the entrance to his urethra and about an inch and a half of the material enters his penis. Subject B's is similar to Subject A's but it only goes around the base of his glans. Subject C's is a stretching material that is placed on the base of his penis. Also, the assistant opens Subject C's legs and locks them in a wide open position so his testicles hang in free air then brings out of the podium an acrylic box that fits into slots in the floor and has a cut out designed to fit around his genitals and stands about two feet over his penis. Also a thin bar about a quarter of an inch in diameter raises from the floor until it is behind his testicles and just touching the perinium.
The assistants signal they are ready and the Director signals for the boxes to be started.
The boxes light up and at first nothing happens. While they wait the Director is explaining to the audience that this is the newest form of interrogation of male prisoners. Leaves no marks on the one interrogated and barring any other form of evidence cannot be proved if the one interrogated tries to report it. Subject A represents one that is to be interrogated, he finds it very difficult to be aroused by normal means. The boxes control the attachments which produce a combination of ultrasonic and electrical stimulation, and have sensors within monitoring nervous system responses, so it can react immediately as impulses occur.
He stops speaking as Subject C's assistant signals, the Director has everyone watch the monitors for Subject C and they can see his penis thickening and rising to a full 14 inches with a massive urethra running up the underside to a 1/3rd inch slit at the tip of his penis. The Director explains that all the subjects are being subjected to this phase of the demonstration but it is not time to show Subject's C's demonstration yet but it is good he started early. Subject B's assistant signals and monitors change to view his penis grow to an impressive 9 inches and his testicles seem to have dropped even lower and seem larger. The subjects in question look amazed and the Director explains that neither subject is feeling any pleasure associated with this arousal, the signals produces are low level yet and are not registering to the brain in a sensory level yet. Mostly these reactions are due to autonomic reactions to the devices.
The Director walks over to Subject A and directs they raise the signals. At first nothing happens then Subject A starts to shift and his eyes widen as he feels a buzzing in his penis and from deep in him. His penis starts to rise to its full 7 inches. The Director looks pleased and tells the audience that Subject A was rated a very difficult case for the device. Now that the device has shown to work he can show what it can do.
He turns back to Subject A and instructs to raise the signals to the point where the subject begins to reach orgasm then slow the intensity to keep him within moments of orgasm, but not to let him ejaculate or have orgasm.
He turns back to Subject B and watches as Subject B is already straining to pump his penis in the air and his testicles are much heavier and trying to rise to ejaculate, he tells the assiatnt to keep him at this level and not to let him orgasm or ejaculate yet.
The Director turns back to the audience and described that the subject are beginning soon to enter into a euphoric state usually brought on by extended production of hormones released during sex. In this state they usually have such a driving need to release that many higher functions of their brain shut down to the need. He was slowing down Subject B's release to something more manageable until it was his time.
He checks Subject C and finds that the urethra is more distended and his testicles are even lower now. He also sees precum beginning to form at the tip of his penis. He tells the assistant to slow the process a little for Subject C.
The Director returns to Subject A, who is try to twist in his chair and humping the air. His testicles are notably larger and darkening. The Director nods and directs the audience to look at Subject A. He says at this point Subject A is beginning to experience a backflow of seminal fluid and is beginning to experience pain. A prisoner placed in this position would soon find he cannot find release and his will weaken. With his higher functions dulled by the hormones in his system he would not be able to fabricate an elaborate lie but could still try to lie to just get relief. One option is to leave him like this until those facts provided can be verified or give an example of what could be done with another prisoner of less value. Enter in Subject B.
The Director walks over to Subject B, who is writhing on his table with his penis swaying above him, his testicles are each the size of a baseball by this time and precum is freely flowing down his penis. The Director shows that by bringing in another prisoner like Subject B they can show that release can be the way they want it or like this. He signals to the assistant to begin. Subjects A and C watch as well when they hear this and watch as Subject B's glans darken and grows even larger and sudden waves of pleasure run through his groin. His penis is like a steel bar as precum starts to gush out. The assistant says that he is approaching orgasm. Subject B is groaning constantly now. The Director says to leave it on automatic now and to set the orgasm to begin in 10 seconds. Even Subject A watches transfixed as the countdown begins and Subject B is growing even more delirious.
When the timer drops to zero Subject B expects the normal tide of pleasure that his other orgasms have been like but his mouth opens silently with a silent scream as a single massive pulse of pain/pleasure drives through his nervous system and his prostate clamps down in a single massive pulse and forces all his stored semen to burst up his penis and fly high in the air. A single stream shoots up and out over 10 feet over him and drenched him as it comes down. As the pulse seems to weaken for an instant another powerful ripple runs through his body as his prostate muscles involuntarily expand to maximum capacity and literally sucks more semen in from his testicles and available ducts and glands. When the device registers capacity it forces another immediate orgasm with a similar result. The cameras record as his testicles visibly shrink with the second stream of semen that is forced from him. The process repeats another five times when there is finally no more semen to be found from the testicles or any fluid in the other glands. The device forces his prostate to open yet again which causes air to be pulled in through the urethra and briefly collapses the urethra, with no more air the suction causes the insides of the testicles to be pulled into the prostate as well as parts of the supporting glands. With this as a load all the insides of his testicles are forced out through his penis. Then the next pulse destroys the prostate as it gives out and is destroyed. The system then stops the muscle controlling impulses and simply floods what remains of the nervous system with orgasm equivalent impulses...repeatedly.
Subject B simply twitches on the table after this with his still hard penis permanently paralyzed in this state and his system flooded with pleasure/pain. The process only took approximately 30 seconds all told. The Director says they chose Subject B because of his high volume capacity to give more time for the process to be performed for the audience.
The Director turns to Subject C, this subject will give a different demonstration. He signals for it to begin, at first nothing happen but soon the precum that covers to tip of his penis begins to drip down in a virtual river of precum as it drips down his testicles and onto the rod that stick up out of the floor. The precum drips down and into the floor and soon people can see something crawling out of the floor, ants. Ants follow the trail of precum up the rod and the subject can suddenly feel them crawling up his testicles and up his penis, to the tip. The Director explains that this species of ant survives almost entirely on a liquid diet and can actually survive under lquid for hours at a time. The ants were not covering his penis and running up and down the pole and they collected his precum. At his glans they covered it and kept trying to follow the source of food. The Director nods at the assistant and the box is adjusted. Subject C is writhing in disgust as he feels the ants on his most private of areas, until he suddenly gets a burst of pleasure that causes his penis to become even harder and his glans to flare wide and pulling his urethra slit open. Ants begin to pour into his penis and the precum comes out even faster. He can feel the ants working their way down the inside of his shaft and working behind his testicles. The progress slows as ants become backed up inside. Another burst of pleasure distanded his urethra wider and suddenly he finds the ants working past the area behind his penis and slowly pushing themselves deeper. The Director then shows the progress of the ants on a monitor using a form of ultrasound. The Director notes to the audience that they are likely going to run into a known problem with the device that was found in trials. The ants are being shunted from the blader by the natural muscles found there and are being redirected to the prostate. Likely when they reach there they will start to dig into the area...which in many cases caused orgasm in the subject that cannot be regulated by the device.
As the ants reached the prostate Subject C began to sweat and he could feel the pressure of impending orgasm...the constant scratching feeling of the ants only made it worse. He soon began to breath heavily and began to ejaculate into the air. His semen was mixed with ants and splashed on the roof of the box and dropped down. As he began to feel relief he realized he was still just as hard and could feel even more ants come and rush down his penis....this time they reached his prostate almost immediately and began to push their way in. He ejaculated again when they were almost filling his prostate. This time not as much semen came out and the ants grew more persistant and some of the smaller ones began to dig and push their way down his cords to his testicles and began to feed directly there. Their increased mass though slowly crushed the sperm ducts in the testicles and as more ants were able to fit in they destroyed his testicles slowly from the inside. The process took 20 minutes and was recorded on video. Subject C had passed out from the pain of his destroyed testicles five minutes before it was finished.
The Director walks back to the delirious Subject A whose testicles look almost as big as Subject B's did before the finaly process. The Director tells the audience that to show there is a safe means of ending this process for those prisoners they want to keep for another interrogation he tells the assistant to proceed. Subject A suddenly grows still as he feels his inside expand and he screams silently as he goes through the same procedure Subject B went through. Subject A is dripping all over from spent semen as the procedure ends 8 pulses later and no signs of damage to the genitals. Subject A though still continues to twitch on the table like Subject B until the Director tells the assistants to take them away for memory alteration and recovery.
I am not good with on the fly dialogue so I tried to avoid it. But I hope this provides some inspiration.
Laryagar
P.S.
I have some ideas for a follow-up to this little story and plan to update this reply's content as I refine the story. This was an initial run at the story and I did not want to go into the dialogue itself. At present I want the tone to stay almost clinical. I wrote this story off the top of my head in one pass so it may be a bit rough, but then it was 3am by the time I finished it...took about 4 or 5 hours to finish.
The story setting presently is so cold and clinical because it seems to belittle the plight of the three subjects. All of them thought they were applying for a simple modelling job with a private amateur videographer and photographer. The audience with mixed gender adds to the anxiety since it is far more than they were expecting to see them so up close and personal, and live. The fact the audience seems so unconcerned about their plight and witnesses their ultimate humiliation and destruction makes it so much more humiliating.
The machine itself would be explained more fully in a follow-up to this story. The device is a combination of the attachments and the box. The attachments vary but the primary attachment is the one that acts as a buttplug. The buttplug attachment is designed to be wide enough to stretch the sphincter walls open enough to allow for the prostate to become a noticeable bulge in the canal, which is why there is an indentation in one area of the plug, to catch the prostate. The ones used in this chapter are the standard size, the indentation in the plug is lined with thousands of transmitters and sensors. The transmitters are part electrical, ultrasonics, infrared and other forms of stimulation. The curvature of the indentation is required for targetting. When inserted the device immediately starts running diagnostics by having transmitters emit low level electrical impulses through the prostate and surrounding tissue and the sensors map which nerves and muscles react to the stimuli of a given transmitter. The sensors also measure the frequencies that produce the best transmission of signal through those nerves. After initial diagnostics are complete the victim's entire rectal region along the path touched by the device is mapped out neurologically. This includes the prostated and surrounding structures. It also allows for access to nerves that provide signal for blood flow for erections and nerves that provide signal of pain/pleasure from the genital area.
All other attachments perform similar functions and when networked through the controlling box the devices can be worked in tandem to gain control of the entire genital area. Although the buttplug is almost always used due to the overt amount of control it can provide.
I was tempted at the end of this story to have Subject A's testicles explode due to undue pressures built up from the prolonged artificial case of "blue balls" the device created, instead of simply letting him release the pent up semen. The reason I did not was due to the nature of the demonstration. The Director was showing how much fine tuned control he was able to induce with the machine. The fault with the ants was not the machine's issue but rather the voracious nature of the ants and the Subject's high production of precum. The Director knew this of course and that was why he chose Subject C, he was demonstrating another use of of the machine. In that case Subject C was not delirious and while likely his sperm production was higher than normal it was not nearly as high as Subject A and B. Instead the machine was concentrating on those glands that generate precum and stimulating them into high production while leaving the rest of his reproductive system at a normal sex level. It was not until the ants gained entrance into his glands that they started trampling over nerve switches that started his rise to orgasm.
I had also considered not destroying Subject B and C's testicles. Simple destruction of the testicles means nothing more to torture them with later on. That is why when I write stories I usually try not to outright destroy a victim's appendage or organs, to destroy them means to actually give them release from future pain you might inflict on them. Also, in cases where the torture is a form of forced orgasm or similarly personal rape, the destruction of an organ needed to enact the torture means you can no longer humiliate them or torture them the same way again. I dislike being limited in my options.
Perhaps in this story I can place as part of the recovery the subjects with destroyed or damaged organs have cloned versions grown and replace the original organs. The subjects might still have ghost images or memories of their experience afterwards...their bodies might still have periodic recurrences of portions of their ordeal, but nothing like the actual occurrence since the devices are not present to provide the boosted signals.
In a possible follow-up I was thinking of having one of the audience propose a challenge for the machine. The audience member would be likely in charge of a branch of a CIA-like entity with trained spies and the like. He proposes setting up one of his most highly trained spies to be "caught" by the facility and be subjected to the machine. The spy in question is supposed to be highly trained in seduction of his targets and is very well trained in restraint and control of his own reactions during a seduction. The spy would know nothing of the true nature of the test or equipment. The spy would believe himself captured by some enemy installation.
I hope this provides more insight as to the nature of this world and this device. Also hope any follow-up stories are going in a good direction.
Re: Something I have not seen done yet
Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2004 12:24 pm
by serb (imported)
this is very good why noy post it as a story >Ok there is no actualoperation yet but