tempdownload (imported) wrote: Thu Nov 14, 2019 10:19 pm @losethem can you please link to the photos that you've seen above please?

I know you didn't just ask me for photos. No! More emphatically HELL NO! Most are on my personal computer, given to

T van Keel (imported) wrote: Fri Nov 15, 2019 9:59 am me in confidence I would not distribute them. So I won't.

Wow, that's a quite im

pressive number of nullos! Are any of them in middle Europe?

I'm not sure if they are or not. Some may be, most probably are in the US.

I’

Origen22 (imported) wrote: Thu Nov 14, 2019 1:48 pm ve noticed over the years that guys with uncut penises seem more likely to advance to nullo status.

I'm American and circumcised as an infant. My nullification surgery is Nov 19 2019. It's only a few days away now. My penis is very straight, thick, and near perfect but it's going anyway.

keyman419 (imported) wrote: Fri Nov 15, 2019 6:35 pm I'm American and circumcised as an infant. My nullification surgery is Nov 19 2019. It's only a few days away now. My penis is very straight, thick, and near perfect but it's going anyway.

May I wish you a great result and a fast uneventful recovery.

50%?! Maybe 10%...

You must have gotten a less extreme version of circumcision than my Army dr gave me as a newborn. I lost way more than 50% of my foreskin ! Count yourself lucky to have only lost 10 % of those great foreskin sexual pleasure nerves. I wonder if you stood out as having such a well endowed penis as a newborn baby ? I read jewish circumcisors say infants penis size varies a lot. Maybe your dr thought he better leave you more growing room than most infants when he left you with more foreskin ?

I guess my Army dr decided I could lose a big slab of skin as a baby and never get any Desert Storm sand caught in my foreskin.

rogerwpbfl (imported) wrote: Thu Nov 14, 2019 2:26 pm Maybe it’s their doctors are confused when they ask to be cut? It’s best to say, “Just a little off the top, please.”

�� �� ��

cutnbulls2ox (imported) wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2019 4:59 pm You must have gotten a less extreme version of circumcision than my Army dr gave me as a newborn. I lost way more than 50% of my foreskin ! Count yourself lucky to have only lost 10 % of those great foreskin sexual pleasure nerves. I wonder if you stood out as having such a well endowed penis as a newborn baby ? I read jewish circumcisors say infants penis size varies a lot. Maybe your dr thought he better leave you more growing room than most infants when he left you with more foreskin ?

I guess my Army dr decided I could lose a big slab of skin as a baby and never get any Desert Storm sand caught in my foreskin.

I think that circumcision is a brutal thing to do to a new born. I only discovered the damage done to me when I hit puberty and my cock didn't have enough skin on it. I remember feeling real envy for uncut guys. Their cocks look so natural compared to my scarred, naked member. Their glans suitably uncovers when erect, mine always visible. Even in what is described as 'hedonistic' Roman culture, an exposed glans was frowned upon.

i too was circumcised minutes after birth and was cut extremely tight causing painful erections through pubery into my early 20's when it stretched now after castration i have excess loose skin which i wish i had earlier in my life. there is no medical proof for circumcision i've read recent study in america saying just that calling for the stop of infant circumcision but the american medical association refused to listen to the proof i know it's a multi million dollar industry for them all so greed is more important to them then mutilating a perfectly healthy child risking permanent damage to a child's penis even to the point of the loss of it due to the incompantance of the provider. the training is minimal for it and inexperianced doctor trainees are doing it with horrible conquences. sorry for the spelling errors.

Ironically, I’m creating a reply only to say “no comment.”

zach

Circumcision of infants and children should be completely forbidden as long as the child isn't able to make an own decision about this. The only exception should be medical necessity, which are rare cases. There's no real benefit of circumcision, but on the other hand the risk of big damage, as Zach can confirm. There are even hints indicating that having a foreskin is beneficial in various aspects.

there have been insidints were the child has needed a blood transfusion and death has occurred from complications of infant gentile circumcision it is a non essential surgical procedure preformed on a non concenting infant techincally it's child sexual abuse under the law but no one enforces it. sorry for the spelling