I was castrated at 23, I'm 26 now. It took me a year or so adjust but the way I feel now I'd say ideal for me would have been 18 - 25. Easy to say when looking back but I feel an early castration would have been fine for me.

Justine x

stephaniesteve1 (imported) wrote: Wed Nov 28, 2018 3:32 am Interestingly it seems most eunuchs wish they had been cut earlier,often a lot earlier.

There's an easy answer in my case: I am a non-binary transgender, and as many transgender I also felt different in my youth already. That's the reason for seeking modification quite early. I never really identified as male, but also not as female.

It has been a while since I posted. I am back! I was 55 am 59 now, wish I had been bale to have it done at before I was born! But really decades ago. Iam either getting older or there seem to be many young eunuchs around EA these days.

Welcome back, nice to hear from an experienced eunuch. From what I've read recently it seems easier for wannabe eunuchs to get cut now than it was 10 or 20 years ago.

I became a eunuch at 57. Looking back, I should have been castrated instead of my vasectomy after our last child was born, when I was 39. Only after my libido tanked did my wife say she never liked penetrative sex. Would have eliminated a lot of frustration if done earlier.

Your vasectomy probably did castrate you. It just took the long way of doing it. Seems like a certain percentage of vasectomies do end up wrecking men s balls in one way or another. For those men it is a slow way to getting castrated.

But once you don t need sperm for making babies, castration and artificial T might be an option to take the faster method to reach the same final gelding.

It seems like drs can keep claiming vasectomies are not castrating some men because of timing. Its about the timing of when most men get their vasectomies and the ages when many men s testicles tend to begin to slow down from age and their natural age caused ball problems usually start to show up. Then its tough to say or prove if age or vasectomy problems are causing their testicle problems.

Many men get their vasectomies done in their 30s and 40s. Then, it takes most men who will be gelded by vasectomies a number of years, some much faster, some longer, for it to reach obvious testicle failures. That often happens in men s late 40s and older. So drs can blame many of the vasectomy castrations on the man s age and his balls naturally slowing down or malfunctioning.

The fast emasculations and testicle problems that a smaller percentage of men experience right after getting vasectomies are much harder to dismiss as being unrelated to their vasectomy surgery.

But the pro vasectomy propaganda likes to ignore any data showing any problems with vasectomies. They rationalize the few men being quickly or slowly castrated by it are worth the much larger number of men successfully sterilized with no major problems from it.

And most drs seem to think men being castrated in their late 40s and older are no big deal to drs. As if, they ve had their balls for sex and making babies long enough by then, so who cares if they are geldings after their 40s ?

The men who desire younger castration could get a vasectomy about 15 years before they want to be castrated. 15 years later, their balls might be failing or malfunctioning enough to give them the benefits of castration that they want, but with their balls staying on them. Or enough medical problems with their balls to justify a medically necessary castration with full insurance eligibility to cover it.

bI would have preferred it had been at 12 or 13, rather than 60. Would like to have been free of body hair and enlarged genitals.

stephaniesteve1 (imported) wrote: Wed Nov 28, 2018 3:32 am Interestingly it seems most eunuchs wish they had been cut earlier,often a lot earlier.It shows up the difficulty in getting cut holds back many would be eunuchs.

Me? Should have been cut 30 years ago.