gandalf (imported) wrote: Fri Oct 28, 2016 7:02 am A question came to mind...If there were a "hidden testicle in the body", would it not be a non functioning testical as far as sperm is concerned due to the higher body heat.

2. Every time I have read something about moving the testicles up in the abdomen so a person would not have to go on TRT, the answer is that the higher heat would essentially render them useless.

3. I am glad mine are gone as well as the scrotum and mine were removed by inguinal surgery. I did not ask if all the rubes were removed.

4. Now, if my dr. were to offer to remove my penis, I would see if he could remove the prostate and all associated male attributes at the same time through the same incision.

Futurist (imported) wrote: Fri Oct 28, 2016 3:29 pm 1. Do the testicles produce no sperm at all or merely less sperm with higher body heat, though?

2. Would the higher heat actually render them completely useless (as opposed to merely less useful than they previously were), though?

3. You mean "tubes" rather than "rubes," correct?

4. How likely would your doctor be to actually agree to do this, though?

gandalf (imported) wrote: Sat Oct 29, 2016 6:55 am Right. TUBES not Rubes. Big difference. Actually, what I had heard (not researched) is that there would be a greater chance of cancer developing in the balls if up in the body cavity.

zeebster (imported) wrote: Fri Oct 28, 2016 9:12 pm I think it might be time for other members to join me in ignoring the posts from Futurist. He's not interested in our input, he has a fetish to satisfy and his mind is already made up as to what the answers should be.

Frida G Cavic (imported) wrote: Sat Oct 29, 2016 7:32 am that´s what my doctors told me. the risks increases.

Paolo wrote: Tue Nov 01, 2016 5:54 pm Statistically, undescended testes which reside up inside the inguinal canals, or even higher up inside the body, are much more prone to becoming cancerous if left there.