pri·ma don·na
ˌprēmə ˈdänə/
noun
noun: prima donna; plural noun: prima donnas; noun: primadonna; plural noun: primadonnas
the chief female singer in an opera or opera company.
synonyms:
leading soprano, leading lady (
https://www.google.com/search?q=define+ ... wQ_SoIHjAA), diva (
https://www.google.com/search?q=define+ ... wQ_SoIHzAA), star (
https://www.google.com/search?q=define+ ... wQ_SoIIDAA), opera star, principal singer "this scene was added to give the prima donna another aria"
a very temperamental person with an inflated view of their own talent or importance.
synonyms:
ego (
https://www.google.com/search?q=define+ ... wQ_SoIIjAA), self-important person, his nibs, temperamental person, princess (
https://www.google.com/search?q=define+ ... wQ_SoIIzAA), diva (
https://www.google.com/search?q=define+ ... wQ_SoIJDAA), pooh-bah (
https://www.google.com/search?q=define+ ... wQ_SoIJTAA); informaldrama queen (
https://www.google.com/search?q=define+ ... wQ_SoIJzAA)
"a city council filled with prima donnas"
Kynetic01 makes a good point.
Over the years, I've had many a prima donna either blow up, or leave in a huff when simple suggestions were made.
Story reviews and constructive criticism are two very different things, and not all authors want the latter. They just want the former - reviews, and good ones.
Not to name names, but two authors come to mind. One would have been very prolific, if 9 out of 10 of the things he submitted hadn't gone right into the trash can!
No kidding - it would take me up to an hour to fix one of his stories for spelling, grammar, and even changing the protagonist's name midpoint because he was (apparently?) too busy fapping along with one hand while typing with the other. Then there were the off-topic stories.
I suggested a beta reader, a spell checker, and an outline before beginning the story. Believe it or not, I was quite polite about it. Some of the stories would have been quite good, if they just hadn't been such a literal mess; and I told him that. I also had to draw the line saying that I could not continue to edit his stuff, and would not post unreadable stories. I still remember the incomprehensible email I got stating that he'd never post a story again. At least, I think that was what he meant. He never posted again, though.
I should also note that editing isn't a problem, usually, but I can't devote hours to just a couple of stories. Some of 'his', above, I was almost having to rewrite to make sense of them, which created another problem, too.
Another author received a rather harsh (but true) comment from another prolific author here. And the comment maker was dead-on.
In short, the stories were novels that were simply too long and made books like THE STAND look like pulp magazines. Also, they were difficult for the average reader to read and enjoy.
While they had great characters and plot, the length and "adverb abuse" did them in. The author was also upset by lack of feedback. Well, welcome to MY world, buddy! It's an age-old problem here. One can't really leave a glowing review when one is too busy tripping over unnecessary verbiage and complex grammar.
My advice is that if you can't criticism, don't send in a story. When someone does offer it, accept it graciously.