I hesitated to jump in here, in part because I'm already a 'fully transitioned' MtoF transgender woman. Mostly, I simply think of myself as a woman now.

There was a time when I took the COIGATI. It gave results that I expected: nearly classic transsexual. The goal of the test and intent of its creator are admirable. There is significant criticism of the test, however, in part because it is based on stereotypes of what it is to be male and female. Those stereotypes do not necessarily mesh with one's gender identity. On top of that, it is not scientific, meaning here that it is not evidence based. For me, the latter is a significant drawback.

Each one of us is the ultimate authority on our own gender identity. This doesn't mean we cannot benefit from the help of a good gender therapist along our journeys.

It would be a good idea for anyone considering surgery to get surgeon references, ask for photos of surgery results, find out rates of complications and of what kinds and so on. For GRS (i.e., SRS) I went to one of the top surgeons in the world. I have an ongoing complication: pain. I knew this was a risk and I do not regret the surgery. Someone else in my situation might have regrets. Take a realistic look at your own risk tolerance before proceeding.

I wish I were able to contribute more. I'm still recovering from what may be the flu. I wish everyone well on whatever path they choose to take, or not take.

@Danya, no hesitation required. You are absolutely correct these tests are very subjective and the most important answers come form within each one of us. My own therapist does not try to reconcile me to stereotypes, we are both much more interested in my own answers having talked about the possibilities.

I wish you well with your pain I am having a fair bit of it myself and it does gnaw away at you making life harder to enjoy.

I did the COIGATI and got labeled: "ANDROGYNE".

Yes me too Ernie

Peter47-NL (imported) wrote: Mon Sep 22, 2014 4:27 pm I did the COIGATI and got labeled: "ANDROGYNE".

Danya (imported) wrote: Mon Sep 22, 2014 2:02 pm I hesitated to jump in here, in part because I'm already a 'fully transitioned' MtoF transgender woman. Mostly, I simply think of myself as a woman now.

There was a time when I took the COIGATI. It gave results that I expected: nearly classic transsexual. The goal of the test and intent of its creator are admirable. There is significant criticism of the test, however, in part because it is based on stereotypes of what it is to be male and female. Those stereotypes do not necessarily mesh with one's gender identity. On top of that, it is not scientific, meaning here that it is not evidence based. For me, the latter is a significant drawback.

I scored -65 in group 3 Androgyne. As Danya pointed out many of the questions were based on stereotypes. I also answered what was closest to how I feel even though it may not have been completely accurate. Probably because the survey was geared toward those considering reassignment, a category I don't fit in to.

Danya,

I had the pleasure of briefly making your acquaintance at MOM '13 and congratulations on your recent marriage. May you have many years of health, prosperity and happiness together.

I just got a -5, which seems to suit me. In a strange way it seems to point out to me why I keep believing I would be better off as a eunuch. Something different not really either. Years ago I took a gender test on the web and came out totally female, way more so then any of my female friends, what was fun with that test was the higher you rose in your career the more Androgyne you tended to be.

I just took the test and came up 15o Cat4 probable transexual.

I¨ve got 153 OMG

I scored a -70 just now.