nvrgag44 (imported) wrote: Fri Aug 29, 2014 6:06 am Judging by the pic with the ruler if size truly matters he had nothing to be ashamed of.

Well, you can also see it attached afterwards and it isn't impressive then. It goes to show that it is true that a large portion of the penis is really "buried" -- that's why penis lengthening is mostly just about revealing that portion.

I would also imagine that the blades will damage parts of the groin and upper thighs as well, not only the penis.

It just seems wrong, to wear your penis on your arm. Why didn't they try one of his legs or thighs? On his arm I bet he could kiss it for the first time in his life.

C&TL2745 (imported) wrote: Thu Aug 28, 2014 10:50 am I'm not sure how one "accidentally" falls under a lawn mower, but if he intended to remove his penis, I don't know why he'd want to go through all he did to get it reattached, and I can think of a a bunch of ways to remove a penis with less risk and pain. He may have meant, though, that he has no desire for intercourse.

Sandi Hehehee...This guy is full o' crapola....That blade would have made mush outa that dong..and, Sandi, m'dear..mayhaps he has no desire becausehe has no nuts either...What position must one obtain in order for the blade of a mower to,without salami-ing the rest of a person, neatly remove one's wang?

I sense cowpoo here..smooches Sandi, m'luv Jackie (with a cock, useless of course, and I just mowed the lawn....eeewww.)..

....

butterflyjack (imported) wrote: Sun Aug 31, 2014 11:23 am Jackie (with a cock, useless of course, and I just mowed the lawn....eeewww.)..

LOL. Eeewww indeed. I think you guys have analyzed the story correctly. He didn't lose his penis to a mower. The mower was just the excuse he gave at the ER. Reminds me a little--well, okay, a lot--of how we lied at the ER about my hubby's penis. Smooches right back, Jackie.

Sandi

The moral of this story is.....

(drum roll please!)

...stupid people should NOT fuck with lawnmowers...