If you want to turn everything off, sure.
But there's subtlety to be had, here.
By varying the concentration of CaCl solution, at a constant injection volume proportional to body mass, you can decide just how fixed you want to be:
There's more to steroid hormones than testosterone, as I've learned here, and there should probably be more than four protocols. And the subtle differences in their results well-characterized, so you can get the exact result you want. For instance, the one test with homebrew zinc gluconate solution produced a complete, if temporary, end to chronic nut pain. I've heard nothing about calcium chloride or ethanol in regards to orchialgia, just reducing libido.
Of course, no conventional ethics committee would begin to consider making a statistically significant number of eunuchs with multiple methods and comparing the long-term effects and differences, so all I've got to work with is animal data.
If we can put together statistically significant groups among those who've taken some initiative, we can start looking into an informal, if rigorous, comparison of the popular methods.
Efficacy is already proven, safety is …LINK TO A BANNED SITE WAS POSTED!already known to be questionable, at best, but that hasn't stopped quite a few people, and I'm not going to encourage anyone to do anything they might regret (or hurt themselves doing). But I think we should consider writing a survey.
I think the first three questions should be:
What method did you use?
What did you want to get out of it?
Did you get it?
I also think this deserves its own thread.
And I'm just going to leave this here: Even if neutersol and its derivatives are only a "chemical vasectomy" by our standards, globally there's probably a fairly huge market for chemical vasectomy.
