Page 2 of 2
Re: chemical castration with hair issues
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 8:35 am
by HumanFly (imported)
Can't really understand why men would take a drug that inhibits a sex hormone so they can keep their hair. It's ridiculous. Baldness is a normal part of the male condition; impotence isn't. Even without permanent side effects, why would any man in his 20s accept them even temporarily unless it was to save his life (e.g. with prostate cancer)?
Re: chemical castration with hair issues
Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2012 1:52 am
by curious77 (imported)
HumanFly (imported) wrote: Tue Jul 24, 2012 8:35 am
Can't really understand why men would take a drug that inhibits a sex hormone so they can keep their hair. It's ridiculous. Baldness is a normal part of the male condition; impotence isn't. Even without permanent side effects, why would any man in his 20s accept them even temporarily unless it was to save his life (e.g. with prostate cancer)?
Maybe because he is misled by the made up Merck stats of less than 2% getting ED?
Hardly the fault of the consumer if the drug is out there and approved by the FDA.
Urologists should have spoken out against the drug's approval but of course the almighty dollar runs everything.