As the definition changes and crimes are tabulated then we can address how to reduce male rapes. Much education and support are available to women victims. Little is known about the number of male victims. My impression is they are changing the definition not to change laws but to understand how big or small a problem it might be.

We would then have stats on the types of male rapes. We have known about rapes in prisons for years and they are working to reduce the frequency of rapes. Gay men are raped sometimes when victims of hate crimes. Women who rape men could also be tracked. Adults be they male or female assaulting under age males would be defined as rape for record keeping purposes. Once the scope of the problem is understood they could dedicate resources to educate and solve the problem.

I think widening the scope of the definition is a very good thing.

Ignore the feminist groups. Most are idiots. Feminazis.

punkypink (imported) wrote: Sun Jan 08, 2012 10:34 am Ignore the feminist groups. Most are idiots. Feminazis.

I strongly disagree with this statement. There are a certain few "man-haters" but by far most feminist groups are NOT itiots at all. Furthermore on principle we should be very good friends with the feminist groups since many of us are in fact in the same boat that they are in. Remember that both of us (eunuchs and women) do not have balls and most men can sense this and a certain few of them are willing to turn this into their advantage.

Then we can get into how these certain few had become "man-haters" in the first place. I can very well understand how. Rape is quite the ordeal to have gone through and some who have been raped will turn into "man-haters". And you really cannot blame them for that.

I remember that some women have balls. Because I am one such woman. I don't know why you are so absolute about women having no balls. Even some eunuchs have balls, since some are chemically castrated.

No sorry, as someone who's been discriminated against for the cover of the book rather than the contents, I have to say most feminist groups ARE idiots. They don't want gender equality. They want female supremacy. I also know that many women who get raped do not end up as feminists or men-haters. They might be fearful, but fear is not the same as hate.

Nobody with any intellect would hate people soley on the basis of gender or on how they physically are, because it is simply illogical to do so. Misandry is as idiotic and despicable as misogyny.

M

devi (imported) wrote: Mon Jan 09, 2012 8:44 am ost feminist groups are NOT itiots.

"Feminazi" was not at all a kind, appropiate, or truthful word to use. And I see no compassion in the use of this type of language. Compassion is a feminine trait which men in their course of life must learn to develop.

I also wouldn't be at all surprised to find out that it was in fact feminists themselves that worked within the FBI that were able to effect this change of policy. And I'd say hooray to that and thankyou feminists for the help that you have once again given to us.

M

devi (imported) wrote: Tue Jan 10, 2012 8:58 pm 59040]
ost feminist groups are NOT itiots.

"Feminazi" was not at all a kind, appropiate, or truthful word to use. And I see no compassion in the use of this type of language. Compassion is a feminine trait which men in their course of life must learn to develop.

I also wouldn't be at all surprised to find out that it was in fact feminists themselves that worked within the FBI that were able to effect this change of policy. And I'd say hooray to that and thankyou feminist
[/quote]
s for the help that you have once again given to us.

Devi I agree. Several in the gay community are taken to task for using the term "tranny" as they should be. Many of us hate terms that are meant to pigeonhole us with certain stereotypes. Let us not use terms against others that create the same negative impression that we ouselves would abhor.

My sister once told me that feminist is just a name for an intelligent woman. It made sense to me. How can a woman with any intelligence be anything but a feminist? they are half the populations, and have been discriminated as much or more than any gay man.

A woman needs a man like a goldfish needs a bicycle.

How obvious does it have to be then and now that the feminist movement was poisoned by their butch dyke leadership. Those ladies with higher T. more aggressive & leadership prone. Consider there were no femi-femi women's lib leaders.

Women's Liberation failed to define the healthy heterosexual relationship. They were just antagonistic to it, period. Then we find out decades later the leadership was lesbian.

How obvious did it have to be?

It doesn't matter when you have lots of loyal , mindless followers. The pretty femi ones too

Yes Virginia, there are Femnazis.

Moi

Viva La Difference

What's it have to do with topicalness?

I don't know. I'm just replying to the drift.

If I was game, I'd get my sister to answer this one. Even to me it seems like utter nonsense. Would you really want women to go back to the days when they were not alowed to work, even? to earn their own living? It's still the case in some countries. They really need Women's Lib in some countries, but then they'd probably be flogged if they tried. The whole women's liberation movement has little to do with whether the leaders were Lesbians.

It does have to do with the denigration of the healthy heterosexual life.

And they were militant!

BTW growing up in Hollywood my Euro centric parents were always having various guests.

Accomplished woman seemed so normal. One lady was a physician who graduated from the medical school in Colorado. Some were artists or muse's of artists whose wives were elsewhere. As well as stay at home moms who cooked from scratch.

Today, high schools have dropped home ec classes. But, shop is still there.

Moi

Child of the fifties.

I wonder

Can MtF transexuals, queef?

PC Moi