There is something about Bella's behaviour which I like to take as a metaphor for how I want to live; sexually. She is always either flat out (on the go, jumping around, playing) or dead to the world (she snoozes heaps). And she can flick either 'Bella' with a switch. She can be snoozing for thirty minutes, but a second later is up and about. It's as if she always has energy just waiting to be used, for when there is worthwhile excitement (which doesn't seem to require much!) happening.
Bella ignores the socially acceptable in-between ways of living. She is extreme all the way. She is honest.
If she were human she would probably be placed on numerous medications, which would invariably result in numerous sigh defects.
My exploration into my own sex drive, and of its place in society, has often been based on in-betweens and extremes. Society wants a straight male to accept and behave in an in-between manner in regards to his sex drive, despite the fact that his sex drive is actually quite extreme. His sex drive desires to be active all the time. It also desires to be involved with numerous partners.
Perhaps not too disimilar to Bella desiring to sit on many laps.
So the most important thing with a males sex drive, I feel, is how much does society want your sex drive to live up to its real desires? And then it is a matter of personally weighing up, the trouble and potential negativity of living with that, vs the freedom but possible lonesome situation of being without it.
Right now I am leaning towards removal of sex drive, but I am also in no rush. If I am still in my current relationship at years end then we will probably go on a weeks long holiday or so. This would be nice. I doubt I will try to chemically castrate myself before then, even if I have the chance too. But I want the chance too. I hope that my next doctor visit gives me prescriptions to anti-depressants (which help me last longer in the sack) and depressants (which can make me totally non functional in the sack). In short, no in-betweens.
There is a fairly major risk I feel with taking Androcur. It's not that I will become overly tired. It's not that I may lose my relationship. The risk I feel is any long term effect that removes it permanently, or much worse still, gives me a functional penis again, but one that is significantly smaller. Personally I am not perturbed by that, but I am aware of my neediness to be with someone at (hopefully) most times of my life, and all the women who have been with me have been with me - at least in part - because I have been able to satisfy them sexually. I may very well be far more proud of my interactions with women in other ways, but nevertheless these haven't been able to satisfy the woman from within; not physically anyway.
My risk however, is clearly - at least to me - worthwhile taking. I do not know if it is ethical, for it would probably effect most people I know negatively, at least as far as they are aware. So what I will basically be doing, is using people (or already used) to get to my goal, if in fact I do reach the ascent of my Zoncolan. The potential rewards exceed the potential pitfalls, and it seems that I am lucky enough to still have a chance to go for the top. There are many instances where my potential 'freedom' should/could have been closed off. And how many people get into such a position (it has taken a lot of different events/decisions/mistakes) as I am now, where they are at least emotionally willing to give it a shot?
Not too many I would think.
Bella on the otherhand, has very limited freedom. She has already been de-sexed, against her will, and of course she can't go anywhere without the consent of a human adult. Nevertheless she seems quite happy, and she doesn't seem to have many worries.
But in actual fact she also doesn't appear to have been negatively effected by her de-sexing at all
