Collection of pics of women who have had clit removed

[SplitDik (imported)]

Personally, I wouldn't even go so far as to say it's the equivalent of penectomy. Closer to glansectomy, in my opinion.

I assume you're saying that because the vaginal walls still have spongy material that is equivalent of penis shaft?

However, a full clit also has a "shaft" albeit proportionately small, so I think that it still represents a significant portion of the nerves from the entire penis.

Also, I don't know about other guy's penises, but the sensitivity of my glans and the "last inch" of the penis" is much greater than the portion of the shaft closer to the base. I would say that losing the glans is more than half of what a penis is all about from a sensation point of view.

Lastly, many women already have trouble orgasming at all, and most if not all require clitoral stimulation. Even those that claim to orgasm just from vaginal stimulation usually get some secondary clit stimulation (i.e. pulling on the skin, or vibration through the flesh). Removing a woman's clit is probably almost guaranteed to eliminate her ability to orgasm via intercourse.

So overall I think it is closer to penectomy from the functional effect.

[BossTamsin (imported)]

Actually, most of what you describe is exactly why I consider it closer to a glansectomy.

Let's take anal sex out of the equation for a moment, and oral.

After you remove a woman's clit, can she still have sex? Yes. The vagina is still intact, and even though orgasm may be difficult (or nonexistant), sex is still possible.

If you remove a guy's cock, is sex still possible? No.

If you remove just the cockhead, is sex still possible? Yes, although as you mention, orgasm may be difficult, if not impossible. And yet sex is still possible, same as with a woman who has had her clitoris removed.

So as I see it, from a functional perspective, it's closer to glansectomy than penectomy.

[SplitDik (imported)]

Actually, most of what you describe is exactly why I consider it closer to a glansectomy.

Let's take anal sex out of the equation for a moment, and oral.

After you remove a woman's clit, can she still have sex? Yes. The vagina is still intact, and even though orgasm may be difficult (or nonexistant), sex is still possible.

If you remove a guy's cock, is sex still possible? No.

If you remove just the cockhead, is sex still possible? Yes, although as you mention, orgasm may be difficult, if not impossible. And yet sex is still possible, same as with a woman who has had her clitoris removed.

So as I see it, from a functional perspective, it's closer to glansectomy than penectomy.

I get what you're saying, just pointing out that there is a "shaft" on the clit as well, and losing that must be more than just the glans

from a sensation point of view.

While intercourse is still possible as you mentioned, I suspect that the woman will have lost a greater portion of their sensations which to me is the more important part of the "function". For me, the inch of the shaft of my penis below the glans is also really sensitive and sufficient to allow stimulation to orgasm -- often I masturbate just with that area without glans stimulation.

Anyway, the main reason I argue it is more like penectomy is in order not to trivialize it -- clitorectomy is pretty much dooming a woman to not experience natural orgasms which is taking away "a lot". The exact proportions of what is lost relative to a penis is of course arguable.

I guess one thing is that a penis is so sexual, that even a small nubbin left is probably orgasmic, but women majority have trouble with getting enough stimulation so it is particularly ruinous for them to lose even a small portion of the sensation. In other words, a stub of a penis left is still probably a more sensual of an organ than a clitless vagina.

[ToddBertrang (imported)]

Not at all. One 1st has to understand how different a mans and woman's orgasm is. Also, there is far more clit under the "skin" even if all the shaft is removed, then there is penile shaft inside the body. to cut off the clit at the shaft base can easily increase a woman's orgasmic ability. This is probably not true of most men. There was a study I found on the net around 10 years ago, prior to my incarceration, that found women that were even completely infibulated had orgasms as frequently and as pwoerfully as women who had never been cut. women and men are not the same, not remotely

[SplitDik (imported)]

There was a study I found on the net around 10 years ago, prior to my incarceration, that found women that were even completely infibulated had orgasms as frequently and as pwoerfully as women who had never been cut. women and men are not the same, not remotely

You can't look at any study like that and call it scientific -- the only way to understand what was "lost" by infibulation is to have before and after measured. It is like how a guy who was circumcised at birth claims they didn't lose anything, yet I was circumcised as an adult and can say that you definitely lose a lot of sensation (a good thing for me because I was oversensitive and had problem with being premature).

And you also have to be careful studying people who have undergone clit removal as an adult because the data can also be biased in either direction (people losing it due to cancer might over-report loss, whereas a person getting it removed for fetish might under-report it).

While there is argument on how necessary the clit is for orgasm, there is no argument that the clit is the most sensitive part of the majority of women's genitalia and if something that is a big bundle of nerves is removed it HAS to result in losing something.

This actually touches on an interesting philosophical concept -- when you lose a part of the body, do you lose a part of yourself. On the one hand we know that humans can certainly continue to live good lives and feel pretty good after losing limbs and such. On the other hand, logically a portion of possible sensation, potential experience, and capability is definitely lost. A brain in a jar somehow must be less.

It is also true that the mind is good at doing some - re-routing of functions, so perhaps the clitoral sensations that are missing eventually get proxied to some degree.

But I respectfully maintain my position that losing a clit is significant, that women who lost them involuntarily as a child have no basis for saying they aren't missing something, and that for many women it would make orgasm harder.

Also, from personal experience I've had sex with a LOT of women (admittedly many of them protitutes), but invariably they like and even need clit stimulation as part of enjoying sex to the fullest and to guarantee an orgasm.

[ToddBertrang (imported)]

If that was the case, then all women who have a clit would have orgasms, and all women who have had all or part of it removed would not orgasm. Since that is simply not true, obviously a woman's orgasm is not based upon their having a clit or not. Having had sex with a few hundred women, and having had sexual encounters with a few thousand, I can safely state that, if done in a "certain way, or ways" many, probably most, women do not need direct clitoral touch to orgasm. Men on the other hand, are far more prone to needing penile touch to orgasm, or, properly put, have an orgasm that involves ejaculation. Not all men have simultaneous ejaculation and orgasm and a man can have orgasms that do not involve a penile orgasm. Similarly, woman can have orgasms that do not involve the clitoris. Lastly, there has not yet been a method to show "your orgasm is more intense then mine" type of scientific research. The study I read about, used a wording that implied an intensity level of orgasm to the degree the orgasm(s) were felt over the region, or the entire body. unfortunately, having lost my pc(s) to the feds, I certainly do not have that link today, and years later the link might not even be any good. However, the research was well carried out and most importantly by a WOMAN, not a man. sincerely - Todd Bertrang

[SeverancePackage (imported)]

These are the only good links I've found as of recent.

http://www.imagefap.com/organizer/83480 ... rcumcision

http://www.imagefap.com/pictures/138698 ... cation-BME

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nOraLoch2 ... =297635842

Any idea where I can find more, there seems to be a fair amount out there if I look long enough...

[newjerseyradical (imported)]

I hope I'm not too late to add to this thread.

I am 22 and have been clitless since I was 14. After I was 18 I had a hystorectomy and my vagina was closed.

I do not consider myself totally nullified since I still have my nipples and my breasts.

Having nothing between my legs has done nothing for my sex drive. I crave sex. I get high from flashing my crotch, letting people touch it, etc. I can orgasm when people fuck or fist my ass, when my breasts are stimulated properly, and when I do oral. I don't feel that being empty between my legs is any loss at all. And I think it looks a lot nice than those ugly flaps and hole.

I must say that I admire men who have had penectomies. I think that it is best for them to NOT have a urethral reroute...seeing pee and cum come out of that scar on the belly is cool. I used to think that total nullo males were the best looking but I have come around to appreciate those who have kept their balls.

I have considered having my nipples removed and would be interested in knowing a woman who has had this done.

[Mac (imported)]

I hope I'm not too late to add to this thread.

I am 22 and have been clitless since I was 14. After I was 18 I had a hystorectomy and my vagina was closed.

I do not consider myself totally nullified since I still have my nipples and my breasts.

Having nothing between my legs has done nothing for my sex drive. I crave sex. I get high from flashing my crotch, letting people touch it, etc. I can orgasm when people fuck or fist my ass, when my breasts are stimulated properly, and when I do oral. I don't feel that being empty between my legs is any loss at all. And I think it looks a lot nice than those ugly flaps and hole.

I must say that I admire men who have had penectomies. I think that it is best for them to NOT have a urethral reroute...seeing pee and cum come out of that scar on the belly is cool. I used to think that total nullo males were the best looking but I have come around to appreciate those who have kept their balls.

I have considered having my nipples removed and would be interested in knowing a woman who has had this done.

I don't understand the need to have your vagina closed and your labia removed. The labia can be rather attractive and they serve a useful purpose.

I can understand why you would find a total nullo man attractive. However, I can't understand why you would deny him the needed urethra reroute. How would you like to have to pee with a hole comming out the front like that?

[newjerseyradical (imported)]

My vagina was closed to prevent penetration and to make me a female nullo. It was my choice although my mom had the same procedure and she encouraged me. She looked so cool between her legs and I wanted to be the same. She paid for my operation for my 18th birthday.

As for men.... I just like to see where their penises were. That hole is so cool looking. I guess it is inconvenient but sitting on the toilet and cupping your hand will direct pee downward. As for cum...isn't that where it is supposed to be. I think it would be much easier to lick and drink the cum from a hole in the front.