Page 2 of 4

Re: Castration by twisting testicles inside sac

Posted: Sat Aug 15, 2009 12:21 pm
by bobbie (imported)
Dana Lane (imported) wrote: Sat Aug 15, 2009 12:04 pm ouch, that wasn't quite what i had in mind!

You will find that castration methods used for animals are good for animals and not humans. Clamping, binding, crushing and cutting are all painful. Many can leave an open wound that may invite infection in.

Think of it this way. If a calf dies it is of little loss. There are many more where that one came from. But there is only one of you.

Re: Castration by twisting testicles inside sac

Posted: Sat Aug 15, 2009 6:12 pm
by Dana Lane (imported)
bobbie (imported) wrote: Sat Aug 15, 2009 12:21 pm You will find that castration methods used for animals are good for animals and not humans. Clamping, binding, crushing and cutting are all painful. Many can leave an open wound that may invite infection in.

Think of it this way. If a calf dies it is of little loss. There are many more where that one came from. But there is only one of you.

When I originally posted this I was thinking more of 'gently' turning the testicle until it cut off the supply. I never even imagined some of the things I saw in this post!

I guess the most popular 'do it yourself' is a burdizzo (sp). And that is a bit extreme as far as pain and general method. I was thinking of something a bit more gentle. Say something you would do in a bubble bath. hehe. :) I know..i know!

Re: Castration by twisting testicles inside sac

Posted: Sat Aug 15, 2009 7:49 pm
by jemagirl (imported)
Dana Lane (imported) wrote: Sat Aug 15, 2009 6:12 pm When I originally posted this I was thinking more of 'gently' turning the testicle until it cut off the supply. I never even imagined some of the things I saw in this post!

I guess the most popular 'do it yourself' is a burdizzo (sp). And that is a bit extreme as far as pain and general method. I was thinking of something a bit more gentle. Say something you would do in a bubble bath. hehe. :) I know..i know!

I actually tried the bubble bath method but the little bastards are just too hard to manipulate.

Re: Castration by twisting testicles inside sac

Posted: Tue Aug 18, 2009 1:33 am
by C van D (imported)
bobbie (imported) wrote: Sat Aug 15, 2009 8:05 am Yes there is a tool to do as described. There is one thing when doing it to an animal and another thing doing it to a human. The little factor is that you are not an animal. Your sack and balls are far different. Just think how different the skin of a horse is compared to our own. Think you see very difference in thickness. If you take spurs to a horse. You see much pain as compared to a human with the same pressure?

The device turns the sack around and not the individual ball. Try to twist you sack around 2 times and tell me that it dose not hurt. Now turn it a third time. Does it not hurt more. Now turn it a forth time. Bet you can not turn it a full 4 times. Now the device will turn it maybe 20 or more times till it will twist off the sack and balls. That has to hurt big time. Will hurt till all the nerve endings die in time. How long will that take days weeks. I am not a horse.

You can't have watched the video. The rancher (or whatever he was) slit open the colt's scrotum, attached the grips to the spermatic cord, locked the handle of the grips in his Black & Decker and twisted the testicle off, one at a time. He did not twist the scrotum off, balls and all.

Re: Castration by twisting testicles inside sac

Posted: Tue Aug 18, 2009 5:46 am
by C van D (imported)
C van D (imported) wrote: Tue Aug 18, 2009 1:33 am You can't have watched the video. The rancher (or whatever he was) slit open the colt's scrotum, attached the grips to the spermatic cord, locked the handle of the grips in his Black & Decker and twisted the testicle off, one at a time. He did not twist the scrotum off, balls and all.

Me again a bit later. Curious that no one who recognised the very painful medical condition "Testicular Torsion" mentioned the dénouement of Kingsley Amis' novel "The Alteration". The little boy, Hubert, after being hurried from pillar to post in order to spare him from the career that Holy Mother Church had in store for him (i.e. to have his balls cut out and be trained up as a castrato) is found to have necrosis in both testicles, resulting from torsion, and they have to come out anyway.

Unsure why Bobbie is getting so upset. In all this thread no one is suggesting that this method of castration should be used on humans.

Re: Castration by twisting testicles inside sac

Posted: Tue Aug 18, 2009 6:53 am
by bobbie (imported)
Think the very first post was posing the question to the group of twisting the cords was a possible way to archive self castration. From the post ......
Dana Lane (imported) wrote: Fri Aug 14, 2009 11:41 pm What are your thoughts about taking the individual testicles and rotating them in say a clockwise (or counter clockwise) direction which should twist the cord and blood vessels into a state that is closed. Would this be the same thing as banding except not destroying the sa
C van D (imported) wrote: Tue Aug 18, 2009 5:46 am c as well?

Think you have your facts mistaken. after being hurried from pillar to post in order to spare him from the career that Holy Mother Church had in store for him (i.e. to have his balls cut out and be trained up a
s a castrato) is found to have necrosis in both testicles. This part can very well be correct. Necrosis could have developed but that is even not likely. It can make for good fantasy reading. The testicles are rather tough organs. They can take more punishment then most people may think. The type of action described is not unlike what happens in many SM Tortures.This however will not generally cause torsion. Torsion is a medical condition where the cords are twisted all by themselves. No outside force is needed. It is a contingent problem.

Torsion is a very painful condition that does need medical attention. I very much understand that.

Originally Posted by C van D http://eunuch.org/vbulletin/images/buttons/viewpost.gif (http://e
C van D (imported) wrote: Tue Aug 18, 2009 1:33 am unuch.org/vbulletin/showthread.php?p=134773#post134773)

You can't have watched the video. The rancher (or whatever he was) slit open the colt's scrotum, attached the grips to the spermatic cord, locked the handle of the grips in his Black & Decker and twisted the testicle off, one at
a time. He did not twist the scrotum off, balls and all.

I saw a video of the sack and balls being rotated as one many years ago. I also saw the video of just the balls being rotated as in the link. I forgot about the video in the link. But I saw the video 5 or more years ago. The video link was posted after my post. Think it is very hard to comment of a post before it was made

As for my comments on this as a method as a possible method of castration. It is simply a matter of stating facts of the problems one could encounter. We have some that visit this site looking for an easy way to self castrate them self. Any new method they have not heard about may intrigue them and may see an easy way to self castrate. Give them the facts may help them avoid going to the ER and trip to the Psych ward.

Re: Castration by twisting testicles inside sac

Posted: Tue Aug 18, 2009 7:00 am
by Kangan (imported)
I've got only one thing to say to all you wannabe eunuchs. DON'T DO IT! Don't even try. The pain is unimaginable (until you've experienced it).

Re: Castration by twisting testicles inside sac

Posted: Tue Aug 18, 2009 7:26 am
by Dana Lane (imported)
bobbie (imported) wrote: Tue Aug 18, 2009 6:53 am Think the very first post was posing the question to the group of twisting the cords was a possible way to archive self castration. From the post ......
Dana Lane (imported) wrote: Fri Aug 14, 2009 11:41 pm What are your thoughts about taking the individual testicles and rotating them in say a clockwise (or counter clockwise) direction which should twist the cord and blood vessels into a state that is closed. Would this be the same thing as
bobbie (imported) wrote: Tue Aug 18, 2009 6:53 am banding except not destroying the sa
C van D (imported) wrote: Tue Aug 18, 2009 5:46 am c as well?

Think you have your facts mistaken. after being hurried from pillar to post in order to spare him from the career that Holy Mother Church had in store for him (i.e. to have his balls cut out and be trained up a
s a castrato) is found to have necrosis in both testicles. This part can very well be correct. Necrosis could have developed but that is even not likely. It can make for good fantasy reading. The testicles are rather tough organs. They can take more punishment then most people may think. The type of action described is not unlike what happens in many SM Tortures.This however will not generally cause torsion. Torsion is a medical condition where the cords are twisted all by themselves. No outside force is needed. It is a contingent problem.

Torsion is a very painful condition that does need medical attention. I very much understand that.

Originally Posted by C van D http://eunuch.org/vbulletin/images/buttons/viewpost.gif (http://e
C van D (imported) wrote: Tue Aug 18, 2009 1:33 am unuch.org/vbulletin/showthread.php?p=134773#post134773)

You can't have watched the video. The rancher (or whatever he was) slit
bobbie (imported) wrote: Tue Aug 18, 2009 6:53 am open the colt's scrotum, attached the grips to the spermatic cord, locked the handle of the grips in his Black & Decker and twisted the testicle off, one at
a time. He did not twist the scrotum off, balls and all.

I saw a video of the sack and balls being rotated as one many years ago. I also saw the video of just the balls being rotated as in the link. I forgot about the video in the link. Bet I saw the video 5 or more years ago. The video link was posted after my post. Think it is very hard to comment of a post before it was made

As for my comments on this as a method as a possible method of castration. It is simply a matter of stating facts of the problems one could encounter. We have some that visit this site looking for an easy way to self castrate them self. Any new method they have not heard about may intrigue them and may see an easy way to self castrate. Gi
ve them the facts may help them avoid going to the ER and trip to the Psych ward.

"Give them the facts may help them avoid going to the ER and trip to the Psych ward."

Very much appreciated, Bobbie! :)

Re: Castration by twisting testicles inside sac

Posted: Tue Aug 18, 2009 10:00 am
by jemagirl (imported)
C van D (imported) wrote: Tue Aug 18, 2009 5:46 am Unsure why Bobbie is getting so upset. In all this thread no one is suggesting that this method of castration should be used on humans.

Unsure why you think Bobbie is getting so upset. All I get from his post is that he is concerned about the welfare of others.

Re: Castration by twisting testicles inside sac

Posted: Wed Aug 19, 2009 4:28 am
by C van D (imported)
jemagirl (imported) wrote: Sat Aug 15, 2009 7:49 pm I actually tried the bubble bath method but the little bastards are just too hard to manipulate.

From C van D. I know I'm going on a bit, but I feel pretty strongly about this. Anyone who tries this procedure on a DIY basis is a damned fool and deserves blood poisoning. There is one place for it and one place only - hospital.

I've often thought what NASTY ideas some contributors have. Just look at "Secret Boy Lover" - where the general idea seems to have been not only to castrate the children and make them passive partners for sodomy, but to inflict the maximum pain and suffering. Stories like this belong in a Sadists' Archive.