Page 2 of 2

Re: Inguinal castration

Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 12:53 pm
by castr8fun (imported)
Thanks Gandalf.

i would love to see your photos.

i did say i only wanted one nut removed.

the other idea i have is much smaller inguinal incision to cut and tie the cord to my left testicle and then through an incision an hour later remove the testicle from the scrotum with only emola anaesthetic so as i can jack off as i pull the testicle out, cut the testicle open while it appears to still be attached and then sever the cords.

this would look stunning on cam. i would then remove the remaining cords.

Naturally with only emola cream i could jack off retaining a full erection.

What aer your thoughts on this proceedure?

Re: Inguinal castration

Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 3:05 pm
by kristoff
castr8fun (imported) wrote: Wed Jun 18, 2008 12:53 pm Thanks Gandalf.

i would love to see your photos.

i did say i only wanted one nut removed.

the other idea i have is much smaller inguinal incision to cut and tie the cord to my left testicle and then through an incision an hour later remove the testicle from the scrotum with only emola anaesthetic so as i can jack off as i pull the testicle out, cut the testicle open while it appears to still be attached and then sever the cords.

this would look stunning on cam. i would then remove the remaining cords.

Naturally with only emola cream i could jack off retaining a full erection.

What aer your thoughts on this proceedure?

Sometimes it is a good thing that fantasy comes nowhere near reality, since that would be disastrous. My advice to you is very simple, don't play with knives, ever.

Re: Inguinal castration

Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 4:48 pm
by gandalf (imported)
castr8fun (imported) wrote: Wed Jun 18, 2008 12:53 pm Thanks Gandalf.

i would love to see your photos.

i did say i only wanted one nut removed.

the other idea i have is much smaller inguinal incision to cut and tie the cord to my left testicle and then through an incision an hour later remove the testicle from the scrotum with only emola anaesthetic so as i can jack off as i pull the testicle out, cut the testicle open while it appears to still be attached and then sever the cords.

this would look stunning on cam. i would then remove the remaining cords.

Naturally with only emola cream i could jack off retaining a full erection.

What aer your thoughts on this proceedure?

I think it is quite the fantasy. The only way you could achiece your fantasy is if you could find a willing cutter. No Dr. would do it under those circumstances.

Gandalf

Re: Inguinal castration

Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2008 6:33 pm
by philip1 (imported)
the testis when exposed to air rapidly becomes excruciatingly painful. This is a bad idea and is good for fantasy only because in reality you probably would go into shock then cardiac arrest.

just speaking from my experience.

Re: Inguinal castration

Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 2:04 pm
by Michael K (imported)
When I was about 14, I had an undescended testicle removed, after a several month round of weekly testosterone shots my doctor thought might encourage it to descend. It didn't. The operation was under general anesthesia, and a plastic prosthesis was inserted in my scrotum opposite my remaining testicle.

I don't remember too much about the operation, but this experience scarred me for a long time, because I felt different from all the other guys and less of a man. I never received any counseling, and my family, rather reserved, never discussed it with me.

Whenever I had to undress, as in a gym locker room, I always felt self-conscious, because the plastic prosthesis is fixed and doesn't move up and down like my remaining testicle. So I always thought I was being stared at. This also led to a lot of sexual reserve, and I haven't had that many sexual partners.

My acceptance of my self I attribute in large measure to my becoming a naturist (nudist) fifteen years ago. For the last two years, I've lived in a nudist community. And yes, that's me in the avatar photo. The photo isn't intended to afront anyone. It's a photo I've given to a number of friends. I just feel it's more an expression of me than any photo I have wearing clothing, which are often just a mask. It's also a photo of liberation, an overcoming of my fear of being laughed at because I only have one real testicle.

I've had an opportunity to see such a variety of genitalia: big penises, tiny penises, "inny" penises, huge testicles, tiny testicles, saggy testicles. One woman I know had a mastectomy, and she had a butterfly tattooed on her nipple-less breast. The term we use is "body acceptance", which means accept what your body looks like, accept what others' bodies look like, and get on to deeper issues.

So I seldom have concerns anymore that people are looking at me and evaluating whether my ass is too hairy, or one testicle is hanging lower than another. Since I work from home, I'm nude about 23 hours out of 24.

This may have relevance to this website, since the people seriously considering body modification - castration, penectomy, nullification - obviously see themselves as trapped in a body they dislike, and perhaps one they feel other people judge negatively.

I fantacize about nullification. I'll never do it. For me that fantasy revolves around a question of how I'd be accepted if I was totally asexual, if I had neither the penis and testicles identifying me as a man, nor the vagina and breast identifying me as a woman. I never fantacize about becoming a woman, but rather an asexual being.

In some sense becoming a nudist is becoming asexual, at least most of the time. I've never seen a guy with an erection in two years. That, of course, is in public, because we nudists obviously still enjoy sex in privacy.

There's also a question of aesthetics. As a naturist, I can look at nude photos of people and appreciate them absent any sexual context. Frankly, I can appreciate the photos of nullos from this same aethetic perspective.

My counsel to those considering radical surgery is that they visit a nudist resort first. Seriously. You can find a listing at www.naturistsociety.com. (Click on the Naturist Network link and enter your state for resorts near you.) You just might find there are some people who will non-judgmentally accept you for who you are within, without regard to the physical body you're trapped in.

If you still feel the need to have the surgery, then more power to you.

Re: Inguinal castration

Posted: Fri Jul 11, 2008 8:40 am
by erikboy (imported)
Michael K (imported) wrote: Thu Jul 10, 2008 2:04 pm In some sense becoming a nudist is becoming asexual, at least most of the time. I've never seen a guy with an erection in two years. That, of course, is in public, because we nudists obviously still enjoy sex in privacy.

There's also a question of aesthetics. As a naturist, I can look at nude photos of people and appreciate them absent any sexual context. Frankly, I can appreciate the photos of nullos from this same aethetic perspective.

It is an interesting point. If you are naked 24h then you do not consider nakedness as something very sexual.

I've met people with different cultural background. For example cultures where men and women are kept separated until marriage, seeing any woman or her body or even talking to her could have very sexual meaning. Just talking to a woman could make guy aroused.

I don't know what happen in men who see only their wives. Any non covered bodypart of woman could arouse them...

Seems like the more is hidden or forbidden the more sexual meaning this hidden or forbidden part has in human mind.

E.

Re: Inguinal castration

Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 3:41 am
by chilliwilli (imported)
It sounds like inguinal castration is the best way. The cords adhering to the side of the empty sack just sounds painful any way you move. I don't think I could last four hours with those cords now fussed on the inside. And forget about flying around on a plane or driving any distance like that.

If some sweet kind stewardess asks "Sir can I help you, what's wrong"...I'll just tell her "Look lady you don't want to know!"

Anyway, you'd be right back where you left off going back to the doc and for another visit.

Does Kimmel do both inguinal and scrotal excision? And if he does the inguinal what does that do to the cost? (as nurse anestesia must now be involved).

I'm all for going the medical route, I'm just thinking the inguinal would be the best way to go with a scrotal reduction (complete removal just doesn't look quite right)

Re: Inguinal castration

Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 4:27 am
by Francis (imported)
YankeeClipper (imported) wrote: Wed Jun 18, 2008 11:42 am Sepsis is a very serious concern anytime there are wounds (including any operations) present. Even for a scrotal castration, a large area, often including half way down the thighs, is thoroughly shaved before proceeding to insure sterility of the area of the incisions.

Any hair, even so fine that it cannot be seen, is still shaved off. Even children have very fine (pre-pubescent) hair. Hair can harbor numerous germs if hair remains in place when the operation is done.

-YC

Well I think in actuality there would be less risk of infection with an inguinal orchiectomy. The scrotum approach is in a very vulnerable area where the incision is subject to bacterial contamination from the anus as well as penis. The inguinal cut, from a couple of pictures I have seen lies above all that and should be no more prone to infection that an appendicetomy.

OTOH such minor scrotum cutting as I have done has never has an infection problem probably to its rather limited extent. They did go right the scrotum not just the outer skinbut there were never any problems.

I noted also that scrotal cuts in my case are generally slower healing than ordinary cuts and scrapes, probably since the area cannot be easily fitted with dressings. I guess if I could find a co-operative doctor the inguinal approach would be my preferred option. I doubt if anyone would countenance ejaculation in the area:(:(

Re: Inguinal castration

Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 7:31 pm
by Michael K (imported)
To: erikboy

Yes, regarding nudity it's very largely a question of cultural context and expectation.

I have no illusions that many Americans find my embrace of nudity weird. When I say that I feel more relaxed, more myself, more un-selfconcious being nude than I could ever be being clothed, I understand that many simply don't understand, because they haven't experienced it or even imagined it. They're working with cultural stereotypes that insist that being nude is a perversion; they're working under the assumption that "clothes make the man" (or woman).

To me, it's simply an expression of myself, and carries no sexual connotations. I've not always felt this way, so I understand how some others can stand in opposition. In some sense, I identify myself as a eunuch in principle, if not in fact, which maybe is why I've registered on this website.

From this viewpoint, I at least imagine a commeraderie of like-minded souls who seek to transcend gender identification as the principle means of self-validation.

On topic, I did experience an unilateral inguinal castration due to an undescended testicle when I was about 14, with the undescended testicle being replaced in my scrotum by a plastic prosthesis.

Michael Kush