Safe Sex Method?

[nullorchis (imported)]

Well, when you get right down to it, absolute safe sex seems to be no sex at all, or sex with yourself. Sex with a monogomous partner would be next, but you can never be really absolutely positive about that. Condoms are not necessarily 100% foolproof either.

Elimination of sexual desire still seems like the best alternative for safe sex.

Sexual desire and gratification are a never ending, unproductive addiction.

One question about chemical "castration"?

Do the testicles still produce useful sperm?

Sperm can be surgically extracted from the testes and used.

A chemically castrated man could at least then rid himself of useless unwanted unnecessary sexual desire and gratification, but still maybe father a child.

[bobbie (imported)]

One question about chemical "castration"?

Do the testicles still produce useful sperm?

Sperm can be surgically extracted from the testes and used.

A chemically castrated man could at least then rid himself of useless unwanted unnecessary sexual desire and gratification, but still maybe father a child.

Chemical castration may not stop 100% of sperm production. All it takes is one sperm to make a baby. That is why it is not considered a form of birth control.

[Jean Op den Kamp (imported)]

To practice safe sex introduce one (or both) of your hand(s) to your pecker! One can't catch anything from yourself!

Yes sir, and then you use some androcur...............

and need an emergency consult at your urologist.

I guess the safest way to have sex is paying enough love to a partner to accept the risks.

loveUall

Jean

[luke1812 (imported)]

I have thought seriously about making this genital mod just for the sake of having my cock that way. The penis would become a tool for sexual contact only. No longer must it share potty chores. I always sit to pee anyway (keeps the bathroom cleaner). I think it might be very sexy to feel my cum driping down the back of my sack instead of in my lady's pussy. Even if I went through with de-nutting myself, It would still be sexy to cum that way.

[Mac (imported)]

Sounds like a good procedure that should be performed on all males. It would definately prevent any unwanted pregnancies. Sitting to pee, as you stated, would be a requirement and no longer an option. Since you would no longer have a need for urinals all public restrooms could be unisex facilities with many stalls to satisfy the anticipated need. Waiting lines would then be equal for all.

I have heard that, due to the increasing risk of sexually transmitted disease, and lowering interest in fathering, some men are opting for a type of surgery that will prevent fathering, and prevent acquisition or transmission of disease.

They have their urethra re-routed to just below the scrotum and just above the anus, and have the tip of the urethra on the penis surgically sewn shut.

This does require that one sit down to urinate. Urine and ejaculate come out the new opening. Should they desire to father a child their semen can be collected and used in an artificial insemination process. (or sperm can also be collected surgically directly from inside the testes)

Without an opening in the penis, risk of sexual disease acquisition is almost 100% effective, as long as they don't engage in any other risky behavior.

Sexual feeling and activity are not affected.

Such operations are not simple, nor without risk, nor would I imagine that they would be performed in most countries.

Has anyone heard this to be true? And if so, where are such operations being conducted?

I am not interested in such a procedure. I was just wondering if this is one of those internet scams. It sounds like an effective method of birth control and disease prevention, so it seemed as if it might be true. For men who think they might want to father a child in the future, and who want to be sexually active but not use a condom or catch a disease, this sounds almost too good to be true. Vasectomy reversal doesn't always work. If too many men do this we will need more stalls and fewer urinals in the restrooms.

[Mac (imported)]

They would adjust to the change and probably even like it over standing. Future males who have the procedure at birth would learn sitting as being natural (same as for the girls). There would be no adjustment required.

If the surgical procedure became a requirement for all then public restroom capacity could be increased with lower cost by having unisex facilities.

It wouldn't do anything to stop HPV (genital warts) or Herpes. HPV can lead to cancer of the penis, anus, throat. You will probably see HPV vaccines for men as well as women in the near future. It seems that it would be a great solution for stopping transmission of HIV. Maybe it should be offered free of charge for anyone with HIV?

I can't believe that MOST men would tolerate having to squat to piss for the rest of their lives. It would be kinda mesy to have jizz run down the back of your nuts when you have an orgasm with your partner. I know my wife would like to not have a mess in her every time but the reroute would be even messier.

[Jean Op den Kamp (imported)]

They would adjust to the change and probably even like it over standing. Future males who have the procedure at birth would learn sitting as being natural (same as for the girls). There would be no adjustment required.

If the surgical procedure became a requirement for all then public restroom capacity could be increased with lower cost by having unisex facilities.

Your Avatar amuses me. The original picture(the boy having his parts) was confiscated in 1996 at my home by the police as being kiddyporn

Just to show you how easy it could have been you who went into jail

And not only you at least 85% of all people, if those hunters came by.

Good Luck

loveUall

Jean

[DavidB (imported)]

They would adjust to the change and probably even like it over standing. Future males who have the procedure at birth would learn sitting as being natural (same as for the girls). There would be no adjustment required.

If the surgical procedure became a requirement for all then public restroom capacity could be increased with lower cost by having unisex facilities.

If everybody had it at birth then there wont be to many following along after a generation or two

[nullorchis (imported)]

Some creatures here on Earth can actually change their gender. Not sure if they do this because they want to, or if nature does it to them.

What we need is for male testes to mature so they carry sperm, but no testosterone. Medical science can then extract the sperm when needed for reproduction. Male aggressiveness, hostility, rape, sexual assaults, pornography, the spread of sexual related disease etc. etc. would then be a thing of the past.

In a non-free world I suppose this could be accomplished. Just disguise Depo as Fluoride and put it in the water.

[Jean Op den Kamp (imported)]

Male aggressiveness, hostility, rape, sexual assaults, pornography, the spread of sexual related disease etc. etc. would then be a thing of the past.

.

Hey man , that could be a fucking great world

loveUall

Jean