New Survey

[JesusA (imported)]

Study of Factors Influencing Castration Ideation and the

Consequences of Emasculation on the Eunuch.org Members

We invite you to participate in a survey of the Eunuch Archive (www.eunuch.org) community. The survey is for eunuchs, wannabes, and others who may have interests in castration.

This survey follows on a previous survey posted on the Eunuch Archive in 2005. The results of that study have been published in a series of four papers and we would be happy to send copies of any of those papers to anyone who requests them.

The previous study constituted the only research done to date to characterize the modern day eunuch community in the western world. However, it also revealed major holes in our knowledge. We are particularly interested in learning more about the social and sexual background of people interested in castration. Thus, many of the questions in this new survey are quite personal, but they can help us better define the community.

This questionnaire will take approximately 30-45 minutes to complete, but one need not do that all in one sitting.

The questionnaire has the full approval of the board that oversees eunuch.org. The two researchers, Drs. Richard Wassersug and Thomas Johnson, are members of the Eunuch Archive Board. Tom Johnson is a retired professor of Anthropology from California State University, Chico. Dr. Richard Wassersug is a professor of Anatomy & Neurobiology at Dalhousie University, in Halifax, Nova Scotia. He is also “out” as a medical eunuch because of his treatments for prostate cancer and has published several personal essays on that topic.

Because of the personal nature of the questions we are asking, it is very important that members of the community understand their answers will be completely confidential. At no time will we ask for your name or email address. Your confidentiality will be completely protected and nothing you say or write will be traceable to you individually. This survey has been reviewed by the Dalhousie Health Sciences Research Ethics Board in advance of posting on the surveymonkey website. Before starting the questionnaire, you will be asked to read about this project and give your consent to participate in the study.

We greatly appreciate your help in this study.

[The survey is now closed. Preliminary data will be posted soon. Thank you all.]

[kristoff]

On behalf of the Eunuch.Org board of eunuchs I would strongly encourage as many as possible to take the survey. We had nearly 1,000 people respond to the first one. A similar response would go a long way toward greater validity of the data sought. Tom and Richard are great friends to this community, and their efforts, and those of many others seldom seen "out front," go a long way in making this community and its objectives of greater acceptance, especially to the medical and scientific community, a very important consideration.

I am certain that I speak not only for myself, but several others on the board, in strongly encouraging participation in this effort. Please take the time to respond.

Kristoff

[OneBallBoi (imported)]

There is apparently a problem with the survey. I carefully hit the agree button and when I got all done with it, it said my answers did not count because I did not hit the agree to terms..Please check. I used Internet Explorer and wonderful Vista.. HeHeHe. If that makes a nickel's diffference.

[incuse (imported)]

There is apparently a problem with the survey. I carefully hit the agree button and when I got all done with it, it said my answers did not count because I did not hit the agree to terms..Please check.

I experienced the samething. I emailed Patricia Lindley about it.

[Blaise (imported)]

Worked fine. Good luck! with your research. At least, I think that it worked.

[Paolo]

It told me the same thing as it did OBB and Incuse. It said my results didn't count.

Oh, the joys of computers...

Browser used - Firefox 3, java - enabled.

[JesusA (imported)]

I've just run a quick check of the first people to take the survey. Of the 28 who logged in, 27 completed the survey and their results are stored for later analysis. The glitch seems to be in the coding for that final page, not earlier, and it has now been corrected. If you got to the final page your results did register.

Sorry for the problem....

[BossTamsin (imported)]

Give me a moment, this deserves to be on the front page....

.... There, done.

[markle (imported)]

I've just run a quick check of the first people to take the survey. Of the 28 who logged in, 27 completed the survey and their results are stored for later analysis. The glitch seems to be in the coding for that final page, not earlier, and it has now been corrected. If you got to the final page your results did register.

Sorry for the problem....

er ... final page? how would i know? I pressed -next- (had typed an answer to something about feelings in youth) at about 17:25 CDT and got what appeared to be the cover (?) page.

drat.

Maybe again tomorrow when i get past being peeved,

markle

We've figured out the source of this problem. Having the time when it occurred was the key. It happened once before when we were having a series of friends and students run through the survey answering questions at random to make sure it all worked, but we couldn't repeat it. Whenever the survey administrator opens the innards of the survey to make a change or correction, whoever is taking the survey is bounced back to the beginning page. This second occurrence of the problem was the clue we needed. At 17:25 CDT we were correcting the problem with the final page! I apologize for the time that you've wasted on your first attempt, and hope that you will try again. ----J.A.

[Uncle Flo (imported)]

By all means complete the survey. This may be the only way we have of getting proper research done. Our entire community stands to benefit from this survey. --FLO--