canonical gospels (which are internally inconsistent and written by unknown authors) appear too late to be eyewitness accounts, nonbiblical accounts are either forged or (to use the polite Catholic word) "interpolated" and are mostly useless, and there are no nonbiblical, contemporary accounts of the man, nor of any other characters mentioned in the story...Joseph, Mary, Judas, etc. And all the things, miracles, and characteristics attributed to Jesus were also attributed to previous savior-gods, from Mithras to Herecles, from Horus to Apollo...you catch my meaning.Kortpeel (imported) wrote: Tue Jun 24, 2008 11:35 am that any such person as Jesus Christ ever existed. The
It is not up to me (nor it is possible) to "prove a negative" that Jesus did not exist. But it is up to Xians who make the claim that Jesus existed to prove their position. And after 2000 years, the proof is simply not there.
Not trying to be insulting here, but as I said before, I consider my task here complete. Now if someone wants to take on the monumental task of proving the existence of Jesus, go right ahead. Example: polemical author Lee Strobel tried in several volumes and failed miserably, according to Doherty and others. And so it goes... Authors and apologists and theologians have been beating the same dead horse for centuries, but it still does not get up and walk. Appeals to authority, to faith, to all sorts of manipulation and distortion of the data, relying on forged documents... please.
Like I said earlier, I grew up in the Southern Baptist tradition, was "washed in the blood" from an early age, and have heard it all. So yes, my job here is done, I leave it in your capable hands. But if just one of you here read any of the books I recommended and find freedom from Xianity (and Islam is even worse and more psychotic than Xianity) then I will consider my time and efforts here successful.
Peace out.