curious_guy (imported) wrote: Mon Jun 23, 2008 10:38 pm
I was not aware that there are any deadly man-made viruses. Can you tell me the source of this information?
I myself am not aware of any deadly man-made viruses. There are certainly viruses that are genetically engineered for purposes such as injecting new genetic material (e.g., genes for insulin production) into bacteria, for instance, so that they produce human insulin. This technology is certainly controversial, particularly in cases like genetically altered food crops. I can cite references but I do not have time right now, unfortunately. Clearly there is the potential for both good (insulin) and undesirable consequences.
The reference to deadly viruses may be to at least two stockpiles around the globe of the smallpox virus, which has been eradicated in humans. This is a naturally occurring virus that had been wiped out of the human population, in 1979, through a vigorous program of vaccinations over many years by the World Health Organization (WHO). Of course, the continued existence of smallpox stockpiles is also controversial, as it should be. It was WHO that recommended that remaining samples of the virus be sent to two reference laboratories.
BTW, smallpox is the only human disease ever completely eradicated. This is a real benefit of scientific and medical research. Over the centuries, smallpox has killed hundreds of millions of people. WHO estimated that in 1967 alone, slightly over a decade before its eradication, smallpox still killed about 2 million people.
Bioengineered and stockpiled viruses are yet additional reasons for people to be informed about what's going on in science and the world. People need to be aware that there have been some very positive benefits from scientific research while being aware of how research has also been misused. The ability to speak with real knowledge and authority is powerful. Unfortunately, the world is growing exponentially more complex and has been for many years. We should not keep silent about issues involving the uses of science nor let our politicians control it. To be truly credible, though, we need to have a clear understanding of how science works and what it can and cannot do. We also need to understand that research will continue whether we like it or not. This applies
Danya (imported) wrote: Mon Jun 23, 2008 2:26 pm
to the origins of homosexuality,
the origins of the universe and an endless variety of other areas.
I will admit my own bias here. I have a PhD in chemistry and an MS in evolutionary biology/plant ecology. Yet I try very hard to be as unbiased as I can regarding science issues as I have tried to demonstrate here. I can see the potential for both good and bad from science. In addition, I no longer work in a science so I have no pet research projects. People do not have to have advanced degrees in science, however, to be educated about it.