JesusA (imported) wrote: Wed Apr 25, 2007 7:10 pm
I hope you dont mind, but Im going to spring your m2M coinage on a flock of sex researchers on Thursday evening. Its certainly real and it needs to be considered in the spectrum of research and medical intervention.
While youve made it clear from the very beginning here that you were not interested in an M2E transition, I hope that youve found the kind of help (and sympathetic ear) here that has been helpful. I know that you have helped many others through your kindness and understanding.
You are a valued member of the group. Thank you for your many contributions. I hope to see many more in the future.
Thanks Jesus! I know that my slant is not the same as everyone elses and I really (honest) don't intend to offend those that I'm not in tune with. I've learned a lot about gender issues (for example) that people have and I've come to have a greater appreciation for those folks. As one example.
I started along this path rather unwilling. My MD listened to my problems and was very matter of fact that "fixing" my broken testicles was not in the cards. That since they were broken and shrinking - cosmetic replacements might be worth considering. The logic took a long time for me to wrap my head around. I felt that I was loosing my "manhood" but... Of course my manhood was shrinking and non functional. So what was I really loosing? Getting to the point of going back and saying I was now interesting in talking about this and moving forward was full of embaressment. This forum let me ask lots of questions (Many dumb but...) but it helped to speak to men about the pain of surgery, how they felt afterwards and most important the men I spoke to that were using HRT after the bilateral.
Jesus I applaud what you trying to do. Getting more mainstream doctors up to speed on this is a worthy cause. I think all the screwing around and time spent trying to get this taken care of has made me a bit of a zealot. I have greater appreciation for people like Dr Bowers in Colorado, Dr Alter in California and New York City (and others) who are open to helping men in a straightforward way.
I should probably ass that m2M defines part of my problem. Its probably was what made me first consider orchiectomy and implants as an option.
Chronic pain and the idea (from the last Surgeon I spoke to) that urologists are all trained to NEVER do an Orchiectomy to solve pain issues because of possible law suits needs to be looked into and solved. From a large amount of the medical literature that I've read it is a very valid final step to solving chronic testicular pain. For what its worth the surgeon I'm working with read over what I've collected, noted the names of the writers and the outcomes and did a 180 on his NO, NEVER, WE DON'T DO THIS policy. Which I think is progress.
Good luck with your talk! Tell us how it goes.