whatdoesitmean dot com

[n3rf (imported)]

http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index974.htm

Yes - what does it mean ?? N3RF

[tinydick (imported)]

and how do you work it it out to be WW3 dont see any troops on the streets of other parts of the world so it aint WW3

[A-1 (imported)]

Well,

Iran has wanted a nuclear weapon for a long time.

So what does Israel got to do with it?

One stinking submarine, and IRAN will cease to exist... read this... (http://www.townhall.com/columnists/Walt ... end_itself) ...and we have 18!!!!

Will the West defend itself?

By Walter E. Williams

Wednesday, August 23, 2006

Does the United States have the power to eliminate terrorists and the states that support them? In terms of capacity, as opposed to will, the answer is a clear yes.

Think about it. Currently, the U.S. has an arsenal of 18 Ohio class submarines. Just one submarine is loaded with 24 Trident nuclear missiles. Each Trident missile has eight nuclear warheads capable of being independently targeted. That means the U.S. alone has the capacity to wipe out Iran, Syria or any other state that supports terrorist groups or engages in terrorism -- without risking the life of a single soldier.

U.S. President George W. Bush looks out from Marine One as he prepares to depart the White House in Washington August 16, 2006. REUTERS/Jim Young (UNITED STATES)

Terrorist supporters know we have this capacity, but because of worldwide public opinion, which often appears to be on their side, coupled with our weak will, we'll never use it. Today's Americans are vastly different from those of my generation who fought the life-and-death struggle of World War II. Any attempt to annihilate our Middle East enemies would create all sorts of handwringing about the innocent lives lost, so-called collateral damage.

Such an argument would have fallen on deaf ears during World War II when we firebombed cities in Germany and Japan. The loss of lives through saturation bombing far exceeded those lost through the dropping of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

After the battle of Midway, and the long string of Japanese defeats in the Pacific, including Guam, Okinawa and the Philippines, had today's Americans been around, they'd be willing to negotiate with Japan for peace, pointing to the additional loss of lives if we continued the war. More than likely they would have made the same argument in 1945, when German defeat was imminent. Of course, had there been a peace agreement with Japan and Germany, all it would have achieved would have been to give them time to recoup their losses and resume their aggression at a later time, possibly equipped with nuclear weapons.

We might also note that the occupation of Germany and Japan didn't pose the occupation problems we face in Iraq. The reason is we completely demoralized our enemies, leaving them with neither the will nor the means to resist.

Our adversaries in the Middle East have advantages that the axis powers didn't have -- the Western press and public opinion. We've seen widespread condemnation of alleged atrocities and prisoner mistreatment by the U.S., but how much media condemnation have you seen of beheadings and other gross atrocities by Islamists?

Terrorists must be pleased by statements of some members of Congress, such as those by Rep. John Dingell, D-Mich., who recently said, "I don't take sides for or against Hezbollah." Hezbollah, backed by Iran, is responsible for the 1983 bombing of Beirut barracks killing 241 U.S. service members.

I'm not suggesting that we rush to use our nuclear capacity to crush states that support terrorism. I'm sure there are other less drastic military options. What I am suggesting is that I know of no instances where appeasement, such as the current Western modus operandi, has borne fruit.

What Europeans say about what should be done about terrorist states should fall on deaf ears. Their history of weakness and cowardice during the 1930s goes a long way toward accounting for the 60 million lives lost during World War II. During the mid-'30s, when Hitler started violating the arms limitations of the Versailles Treaty, France and Britain alone could have handily defeated him, but they pursued the appeasement route.

Anyone who thinks current Western appeasement efforts will get Iran to end its nuclear weapons program and end its desire to eliminate Israel is dumber than dumb. Appeasement will strengthen Iran's hand, and it looks as if the West, including the United States, is willing to be complicit in that strengthening.

Dr. Williams serves on the faculty of George Mason University as John M. Olin Distinguished Professor of Economics and is the author of More Liberty Means Less Government: Our Founders Knew This Well.

That is 24 nuclear missles, each with 8 MIRVed warheads, each with around 300 kilotons of TNT equivalent. That translates to 192 targets, each being hit with a weapon that is equivalent to approximately 20 times the strength of the weapon dropped on Nagasaki.

Don't worry about Iran attacking anybody. You saw what happened in Baghdad...TWICE...they will not EVEN know what hit them, let alone try a retalliatory attack..

It will be....

Bye bye Iran...

[n3rf (imported)]

So - how long did it take Iran or was it Pacistan that had a BIG earth - quake not long ago to recoupb and restore.

My question is - how long will it take to recoup after nuclear garbage dumping on these people.

Yes we did send some Aid, but this earth quake I recall was really devastating.N3RF

[Riverwind (imported)]

N3RF

I like your new Avatar

River

[n3rf (imported)]

Well - Thank You River and all EA for letting me use it here.

This is the story how I got it. The Agency I worked for had a Diamond with a Ball and a Flame. I wanted something less warlike, somehing that also represented the Earth and the Flame a Sail or the Flame of Life, and then the Signal sparks and the Eagle, the Viking Ship the Plane that I inserted in between the two.

Well here comes the STARTLING event that happened to me. I was inserting some Shadows on the Neck of the ALADIN LAMP, and lo and behold a face showed up. A smiling face of the GENIE. I got quite startled as I recall.

The collars was added later and I have use This LOGO ever since I had it Copyrighted in 1967. The friend lawyer of the Agency wrote me one time "complaining" that I was using their Logo. Well It was too late. It was already mine to keep.

That is the story I have regarding this LOGO of mine and now it has been entered also as the AVATAR of mine at EA.

You already know that N3RF is my Amateur Radio callsign so I do not hide my Identity at all. Look it up on QRZ.COM and enter the Callsign in the upper left corner and there You know all about me. If You send me an Email to n3rf@earthlink.net when I answer You get my entire Bio - abreviated at the end. That is all for now. 73 88 JSm N3RF