Cheney's Lesbian Daughter Pregnant

[Riverwind (imported)]

Cheney's Lesbian Daughter Pregnant

What do you think?

Here are what some of the locals said,

Marvin Sayles,

Systems Analyst

"I bet it's a pretty big relief for Cheney to find out his daughter's lesbian phase is finally over."

Frieda Smith,

Personal Trainer

"God, I hope the father is black."

Roger Warrens,

Framer

"It's deplorable that a celebrity couple like this would deliberately bring into the world a child that Christians can't love."

For these and other reader comments read all about it in the ONION

© Copyright 2006, Onion, Inc. All rights reserved.

The Onion is not intended for readers under 18 years of age.

So what do you think?

Me, the only problem I see is if the baby is a boy and in a few years goes hunting with his grandpa.

River

[strassenbahn (imported)]

I utterly despise Cheney as a major contributor to many of the disasters of the adminstration of America's worst ever president, but frankly I find his acceptance of his daughter's sexual orientation (including having her partner appear in the family's Christmas card photo) a rather appealling touch in an otherwise hateful person.

[Paolo]

OK, if she's a lesbian, then who's the father?

[JesusA (imported)]

A lesbian acquaintance of mine once regaled (maybe the wrong term) a group of us with a far too graphic description of how she became pregnant, using semen from a gay friend and a turkey baster manipulated by her partner to place the semen properly.

Her son is a fine young man, loved and cared for by his mother, her partner, his sperm-donor father and his partner. He is also, apparently, straight, despite having FOUR gay parents. So much for Radical Right rhetoric….

[Blaise (imported)]

A lesbian acquaintance of mine once regaled (maybe the wrong term) a group of us with a far too graphic description of how she became pregnant, using semen from a gay friend and a turkey baster manipulated by her partner to place the semen properly.

Her son is a fine young man, loved and cared for by his mother, her partner, his sperm-donor father and his partner. He is also, apparently, straight, despite having FOUR gay parents. So much for Radical Right rhetoric….

Of course, it has always been the case that some children have gay parents. I suspect that some children owe their existence to the need for a parent to prove her or she is not gay! We think that society began with us. We simply relearn society with each generation.

[A-1 (imported)]

A lesbian acquaintance of mine once regaled (maybe the wrong term) a group of us with a far too graphic description of how she became pregnant, using semen from a gay friend and a turkey baster manipulated by her partner to place the semen properly.

Her son is a fine young man, loved and cared for by his mother, her partner, his sperm-donor father and his partner. He is also, apparently, straight, despite having FOUR gay par

ents. So much for Radical Right rhetoric

….

Of course, it has always been the case that some children have gay parents. I suspect that some children owe their existence to the need for a parent to prove her or she is not gay! We think that society began wi

th us. We simply relearn society with each generation.

PoppyCOCK...

I suspect that it would behoove us to pay to the notion to never settle for ARTIFICIAL insemination when you can have the REAL THING!

What is the sense in masturbating into a cup, sucking it up with a meat baster and then injecting it into a vagina after you have determined the 48-hour period of fertility in the average female menstrual cycle?

What is so right about that? Don't Gay people have meaningless sex for PURE JOY like Straight people do? Or, must they be bound by the same rules as a celebate religious vow? What is the point?

Why should somebody determine the propriety of a Gay person having a sexual encounter with a person of the opposite sex? Would this one encounter or perhaps "affair" "RUIN" their Gayness? Doesn't that sound a bit like the Conservative Religious Right propaganda to you? Except with a Gay spin...

...Well, the Gay radicals have NO moral precidence over the Religious RIght in that case. They are BOTH FUCKED UP!

Also, why are the circumstances of her conception so important? If she were to have conceived as the result of male - female intercourse would that somehow prove that she was NOT Gay? Conversely, would it "PROVE" that she was Straight? What in the HELL are WE be being expected to accept here as factual?

Whose business is it how she got pregnant, anyway?

Whose business is it if Britney Spears shaves her pussy and does not wear panties? Why in the hell do we insist on place value judgements upon people for behavior that has little or no meaning except to them or to their loved ones?

I mean, in the scheme of things, what in the hell difference does it make what the woman's sexual "orientation" is? Shouldn't we be celebrating the child instead of the political point of the circumstances of the child's conception?

DO you blelieve that she can consume wine once without being an alcoholic?

Why is it that male - Female sex is so repugnant to Gays? Or, is it, really, to the common Gay just trying to get by? It this just another line-in-the-sand fantasy? Is it not just as much of a fantasy of the repugnance of Straight sex to Gay people as Gay sex is to those who are Straight?

Personally, I think that WAY too much attention is paid to Gay - Straight "Preference or Choice..." or whatever in the hell that you want to call it.

The answer to these and other interesting questions lies in the perception of what it means to be Gay or what it means to be Straight or perhaps, what it means to be Bisexual.

Neverthless, why does one sexual encounter "BRAND" one Gay or Straight in perpetuity?

IS this not just another way that "BUSYBODIES" have of controlling people?

And, who in the hell CARES if the kid is Straight or Gay? I mean, except for the kid...?

...This thread sucks, it really, really does...

[Riverwind (imported)]

I think you missed the point A-1.

This is in part an article I got off the Onion, the Onion is a satire newspaper.

It is made to make you laugh and nothing is sacred to them, everything is fare game. I am glad to see it raise your blood pressure, because when I read this, this morning I was laughing so hard I had tiers in my eyes.

River

[Blaise (imported)]

PoppyCOCK...

I suspect that it would behoove us to pay to the notion to never settle for ARTIFICIAL insemination when you can have the REAL THING!

What is the sense in masturbating into a cup, sucking it up with a meat baster and then injecting it into a vagina after you have determined the 48-hour period of fertility in the average female menstrual cycle?

What is so right about that? Don't Gay people have meaningless sex for PURE JOY like Straight people do? Or, must they be bound by the same rules as a celebate religious vow? What is the point?

Why should somebody determine the propriety of a Gay person having a sexual encounter with a person of the opposite sex? Would this one encounter or perhaps "affair" "RUIN" their Gayness? Doesn't that sound a bit like the Conservative Religious Right propaganda to you? Except with a Gay spin...

...Well, the Gay radicals have NO moral precidence over the Religious RIght in that case. They are BOTH FUCKED UP!

Also, why are the circumstances of her conception so important? If she were to have conceived as the result of male - female intercourse would that somehow prove that she was NOT Gay? Conversely, would it "PROVE" that she was Straight? What in the HELL are WE be being expected to accept here as factual?

Whose business is it how she got pregnant, anyway?

Whose business is it if Britney Spears shaves her pussy and does not wear panties? Why in the hell do we insist on place value judgements upon people for behavior that has little or no meaning except to them or to their loved ones?

I mean, in the scheme of things, what in the hell difference does it make what the woman's sexual "orientation" is? Shouldn't we be celebrating the child instead of the political point of the circumstances of the child's conception?

DO you blelieve that she can consume wine once without being an alcoholic?

Why is it that male - Female sex is so repugnant to Gays? Or, is it, really, to the common Gay just trying to get by? It this just another line-in-the-sand fantasy? Is it not just as much of a fantasy of the repugnance of Straight sex to Gay people as Gay sex is to those who are Straight?

Personally, I think that WAY too much attention is paid to Gay - Straight "Preference or Choice..." or whatever in the hell that you want to call it.

The answer to these and other interesting questions lies in the perception of what it means to be Gay or what it means to be Straight or perhaps, what it means to be Bisexual.

Neverthless, why does one sexual encounter "BRAND" one Gay or Straight in perpetuity?

IS this not just another way that "BUSYBODIES" have of controlling people?

And, who in the hell CARES if the kid is Straight or Gay? I mean, except for the kid...?

...This thread sucks, it really, really does...

The thread is silly, isn’t it? Foucault noted some of your points. Thanks.

[Blaise (imported)]

I think you missed the point A-1.

This is in part an article I got off the Onion, the Onion is a satire newspaper.

It is made to make you laugh and nothing is sacred to them, everything is fare game. I am glad to see it raise your blood pressure, because when I read this, this morning I was laughing so hard I had tiers in my eyes.

RiverWell, The Onion! You mean that is not the most serious newspaper in America?

[kristoff]

I think you missed the point A-1.

This is in part an article I got off the Onion, the Onion is a satire newspaper.

It is made to make you laugh and nothing is sacred to them, everything is fare game. I am glad to see it raise your blood pressure, because when I read this, this morning I was laughing so hard I had tiers in my eyes.

River

The Onion is a fantastic little rag - I always grab a new issue as soon as I see it.

While A-1 certainly raises many points that many have raised before and will no doubt be discussed for years / generations, and should be, I really suspect that someone mostly needs a nap.....