kristoff wrote: Mon Jan 14, 2008 9:14 pm I am in full agreement with Don. I used to use compliance contracts ages ago with psychological patients. Aside from noted exceptions in Don's post, they have utterly NO legitimate use in the world of medicine, save for patients with behavioral issues (and working in consort with a therapist or psychologist). Any MD who would attempt to make imposition of such contracts needs to be reported to his state examiner's board for investigation as incompetent and disrespectful of patients. Period.
The very notion is infuriatingly insulting.
So this is some kind of "contract" that says patient must __________ or the doctor will quit? Or? I still can't quite get my head around this concept.
I "think" I get the idea when you have opiates involved. ie you must not chew them up or mainline them to get high or we won't give you any more? Are we talking about that sort of thing?