Hi everyone,
Today is somewhat special: it's the one-year anniversary of changing my name and getting a female driver's license. Hooray.
Reflecting on my transition, I see that I'm not aiming for full integration into female society. Rather, I've reached a "good enough" state where I pass as female for public purposes, and that suffices.
How do I characterize myself as this point? Good question. The philosophy behind transsexual treatment says, "You are one or the other. If you're not happy as a man, become a woman." But I've stalled [comfortably] in my transition before reaching full womanhood:
- Comfortable shaving every other day since most of the remaining hairs are white anyway.
- Thinking of other things I can do with the money saved for GRS.
- Not bothering to correct boss and co-workers when they refer to me by male pronouns.
Suppose I'm best characterized as a feminine eunuch... which brings me to the main reason for writing today. Seems like Western culture has lost the knowledge of what eunuchs are really like. Gender issues have really bothered me and I've done oodles of searches on Google about traditional eunuchs and came away with very little information.
We could attribute the lack of information to the fact that it's the winners who write history, and eunuchs were not the winners.
In high school, if someone had asked me what a eunuch was like, I would have said, "They are tall with a high voice," NEVER CONSIDERING AT ALL what their personality was like, whether they were androgynous or feminine in any way. NEVER OCCURRED TO ME! Apparently didn't occur to the scholars writing the textbooks either.
Anyway... (going out on a limb here)... if society offered the option of being a eunuch, I believe that would address many TG/TS needs. Folks with GID, like myself, are uncomfortable in our birth gender, but there's only one other gender to choose in Western culture. Hence, a TG boy will pray to become a girl. What if being a gender-variant eunuch were a culturally-acceptable option? Would that meet most of the needs? What about FtM transsexuals in such a culture -- would they be sufficiently happy becoming gender-variant "eunuchs", starting from the female side?
I may be off-base with the thinking above, but one thing I'm convinced of: Western culture doesn't have a clue what a eunuch is really like. They think of eunuchs as simply "Men without Testicles," never considering these two factors:
What factors in the person's psyche led him to agree to becoming a eunuch in the first place?
What effect does the lack of testosterone have on a person?
Try it yourself: picture in your mind a eunuch in charge of a harem in Arab lands. What does he look like? Is he big? Strong? Muscular? Doesn't sound like the eunuchs I know. Where do we get these images?
In the face of not finding historical information about eunuchs on the internet, I've turned to looking for images. I figured maybe an insightful artist from a time period having eunuchs would paint one realistically. The search wasn't fruitful. There are two historical eunuchs who show up all over the place, always the same image of each:
a Chinese eunuch showing full nullification
a fellow in a flowing gown and mighty tall hat, entitled "Habit of a white eunuch in 1749."
(Aside: I don't know about the second guy above... did castration make YOU want to wear absolutely outrageous hats?) Then there's the Ethiopian eunuch whom Philip baptized in the Bible (Acts, Chapter 8). Most portrayals of the Ethiopian eunuch show him with a beard. WHAT ARE THESE ARTISTS THINKING?!!! Post-pubertal eunuchs of our time may be able to sport beards, but not historical eunuchs.
NOT ONLY THAT... As useful as the Eunuch Archive is for instructing us about real-life eunuchs, there's a filtering process in place which has skewed the results. Feminine candidates for eunuchhood identify as transgender or transsexual and are removed from the "eunuch" pool. Masculine or androgynous-leaning candidates for eunuchhood identify simply as males or eunuchs and are the ones remaining in the eunuch pool who can tell us what eunuchs are really like. So even here at EA, our views of eunuchs are skewed toward the male side.
So we simply don't know what the eunuchs of old were like. Historians may describe some of the physical characteristics of eunuchs or tell us scandalous sexual things, but we are met with silence when it comes to what eunuchs were like as people. Were they "one of the boys"? Or more like "one of the girls"? Or did it depend on the individual?
* * *
How am I doing, you ask? Doing very well emotionally. Still taking estrogen, but at a reduced dosage (4mg/day) since I'm feeling more like a "post-op" these days. (Realized boobies weren't getting any bigger, so only using estrogen for mental/emotional benefits now.) Feeling accepted well enough at work in my female state. I'll be a successful poster boy/girl for bilateral orchiectomies yet!
Terri, a feminine eunuch