An interesting site regarding the London bombins

A-1 (imported)
Articles: 0
Posts: 5593
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2001 4:44 pm

Posting Rank

Re: An interesting site regarding the London bombins

Post by A-1 (imported) »

Zoroaster sez...
Zoroaster (imported) wrote: Sun Jul 31, 2005 10:12 pm "Liberal Anarchist" is an oxymoron, bucko,...

Well, you can have anarchists at either end of the extreme left or the extreme right. I have seen both in my time. Either way an anarchist avocates overthrow of the government by whatever means necessary, with little concern about what to replace government with...

Anyway, you are precisely correct about the Patriot Act. It's roots are firmly planted in the War on Drugs (http://www.theagitator.com/archives/012337.php), which is a complete and utter waste of time and money. We should have roach motels, where users...er...make that LOSERS, can check in but can't check out, unless they can do so under their own power.

The war on drugs was really all about money. (http://www.rationalrevolution.net/war/c ... reagan.htm)

As Riverwind always says, follow the money. (http://www.rawstory.com/exclusives/benw ... anking.htm) The real problem here is not a War on Drugs or even a War on Terrorism but what might be more accurately described as a "GLOBAL PURSE SNATCH" than a 'war' on anything.

It is clear that the so called “war on terrorism” is a sham and that many U.S. banks are complicit in helping to launder the dirty money of the terrorists, most of it generated by the illicit drug trade, chiefly the opium trade out of Afghanistan. So much for the “war on drugs,”

In other places (http://www.nycop.com/May_01/How_Goes_th ... drugs.html) we find even more information that claims that the War on Terrorism is in reality an offshoot of the "War on Drugs" and that the whole thing is more of a Global Purse Snatch except for now the 'sucker' has changed.

So, Zoroaster, we see the term "Liberal Anarchist" (http://www.oilempire.us/drugs.html) may not be as OXYMORONISH as you would have us believe. In fact, it seems that Liberal Anarchists are an endangered species, committing suicide after writing long books critical of the CIA and the Bush family. Of course, the suicide is debatable... (http://prorev.com/2004/12/gary-webb-sto ... t-read.htm)

"Gary Webb, a prize-winning investigative journalist whose star-crossed career was capped with a controversial newspaper series linking the CIA to the crack cocaine epidemic in Los Angeles, died Friday of self-inflicted gunshot wounds, officials said.

Mr. Webb, 49, was found dead in his Carmichael home Friday morning of gunshot wounds to the head, the Sacramento County Coroner's Office said Saturday."

Note the plural "wounds". An actual suicide from a gunshot to the head wouldn't leave the victim in any state to pull the trigger a second time. Vince Foster, care to comment?

AND

Gary Webb joins Mark Lombardi, J.H. Hatfield,

and Danny Casalaro as the fourth 'suicide'

by an individual who had a detailed understanding

of the structure and workings of the Bush crime

family.

A mathematician friend of mine calculated the

odds when Hatfield died of 'suicide.'

"Examining the male U.S.suicide rate for recent years

(http://www.suicidology.org/stats2001/1999datapage2.pdf), we can

extrapolate a conservative estimate of 17 male suicides per 100,000

people, or 0.017%. The odds of 3 specific (all male?) biographers

committing suicide would be the cube of 17/100000, or 4.913 x

10^-12...about 5 chances in one trillion. (That's over 300,000 times LESS

likely than drawing a Royal Flush in 5 card stud poker with no wild cards.

DNA evidence resulting in court convictions is reliable to about 1 person

in 100,000 to 1 person in 1,000,000.) This calculation should be regarded

as a conservative estimate: the actual odds against such a "coincidence"

would be much greater. For example, if any of the biographers were female,

the odds would be even greater."

So, you see, we go on.

Watch your back.

Watch what you say.

So, Zoroaster, why do you want to know what blogs that I read on a regular basis? I just picked these up in a Google search. I meant no harm. HONEST, I didn't!

C'mon SAG and my other friends, surely you have an opinion on this one?

Maybe all investigative reportes are terminally depressed with suicidal tendancies. Maybe that is a prerequesite for becoming an investigative reporter.

QUICK! Somebody warn Bill Kurtis (http://pepperbay.com/billkurtis/) before he jumps in a volcanic flow or something.

It seems that this is more of an endangered species than sexy little American girls (http://www.bellaonline.com/articles/art34100.asp) on vacation in Aruba looking for love and romance.

Can anyone say Mitochondrial DNA? (http://www.dnatestingcentre.com/Mitochondrial.htm)

Boy, some people investigating deaths are much smarter than others. 🔨

🚬 A-1 🚬

P.S. I can read it now, A-1 (not his real name) commits suicide in a kinky sex act with an 18-year-old blond girl, by at the moment of orgasm making a horrible mistake and de-capitating himself instead of de-balling himself... 😄 ...the 18-year-old blonde girl was a runaway that he picked up at the local mall and is the grand-daugher of a retired CIA operative. She has been taken into custody and is now in Quantico for de-briefing, which is curious because her arrest report says that she was not wearing 'briefs' of any kind. ;)
sag111 (imported)
Articles: 0
Posts: 1224
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2002 12:18 am

Posting Rank

Re: An interesting site regarding the London bombins

Post by sag111 (imported) »

Well sure i have an opnion but i think i better keep it to myself not that it would make much diffrence to anyone one way or the other.This hatred goes back farther then Eve and thats a fer peice as i see it.Some people will hate people they never meet and kill them if they had the chance and blame the victomes when they get caught<sigh>
Riverwind (imported)
Articles: 0
Posts: 7558
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2001 1:58 pm

Posting Rank

Re: An interesting site regarding the London bombins

Post by Riverwind (imported) »

Jesus, you are of course right

A1, you are wrong,

This is not, let me repet it NOT a Republican or Demecrat platform.

I dont need to write 10,000 words to say so. Anybody that starts messing the the Bill of Rights is _______________ fill in the blank.

For the first time in my life I am not happy about our country, dont get me wrong, Johnson the bastard, I hated and still do. What is bothering me and should be bothering you is the shit canning of the Bill of Rights. I dont give a damn who is in the whitehouse, or congress.

RW
A-1 (imported)
Articles: 0
Posts: 5593
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2001 4:44 pm

Posting Rank

Re: An interesting site regarding the London bombins

Post by A-1 (imported) »

River,

Read the last 1/2 of my posts.

Especially the one about the grand parents turning in the High School Senior and how he is 'set up' by the Cop's daughter for prosecution as a terrorist under provisions of the 'Patriot Act'. It seems that what has been feared for so long has come to pass.

The story is here. (http://msnbc.msn.com/id/8669123/)

Members of the same household turing each other in for 'Terrorism'

The first 1/2 of the post replying to Jesus is mostly sarcasm.

Ironic, isn't it, that we can 'forsee the future' and 'prevent' a mass-murdering event in Michigan but we cannot hang a rap on a bunch of sexual preditors who rape and kill and 18-year-old girl on vacation in Aruba.

...or that 4 'investivigative reporters' investigating "W's" business deals commit suicide. I still think that we should warn "Bill Kurtis".

However, as bad as the world is, it could still be worse.

Sorry that I am so hard to understand.

🚬 A-1 🚬
A-1 (imported)
Articles: 0
Posts: 5593
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2001 4:44 pm

Posting Rank

Re: An interesting site regarding the London bombins

Post by A-1 (imported) »

Zoroaster (imported) wrote: Sun Jul 31, 2005 10:12 pm "Liberal Anarchist" is an oxymoron, bucko, and the Patriot Act has, for the most part, not been used to prosecute suspected terrorists. It has mostly been used exactly as the "liberal anarchists" have feared it would be: to destroy the constitutional rights of American citizens. The loosening of federal restrictions on wiretapping has been the most-abused portion, with local police departments using it (illegally) to attempt to gather evidence against small-time drug dealers. Whether or not you think that's a worthwhile cause (which, for the record, I don't - confusing the terrorism issue even further only undermines the genuine efforts to eradicate it), it's certainly not being used for the purpose it was intended (much like the Endangered Species Act, the primary beneficiary of which has been Wal-Mart, not endangered species), and should therefore be revoked or seriously altered.

Zoroaster,

By JOVE! I think that you have got it!

Confusing the issue allows anybody to be labelled a 'Terrorist', stripped of their Constitutional rights and shipped off to prison with out a trial or maybe with a trial in a marsupial den. (read, Kangaroo Court) (Oh for the security of (Read (Be Afraid -- Be Very Afraid) Mr. Robert's (http://www.dfw.com/mld/startelegram/new ... lly_ivins/) pouch!) However, I'd be more than he could "stomach".

Now, Cotton (http://www.spurgeon.org/~phil/mather.htm) Mather (http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/project ... L_BMAT.HTM) called people 'Witches' in New England and did much the same thing, buring them at the stake and hanging them.

Of course, we haven't tried the 'trial by water' or the 'trial by fire' methods yet, but have patience, we already got Mackie the Wolfie posting about allowing torture.

Just like movie GOTHICA when the mass-murdering deputy tells Hallie Berry about how they tortured their victims before they killed them... (http://movies.yahoo.com/shop?d=hc&id=1800019906&cf=gen) "We were their Gods, they would do anything..."

So a tortured person will say anything to make it stop. Whether it is true or not.

So, have their families or neighbors turn them in, arrest them under the "PATRIOT ACT" take away their rights, imprison them, torture confessions out of them, and convict them in "A TRIBUNAL" instead of a trial and then either lock them up and throw the key away or simply execute them for treason, terrorism or whatever your whim happened to be for that day.

Anybody for moving to the moon?

Better hurry. Smart money says that the war is costing us so much that we are going to ground NASA. ;)

Can't afford to kill Astronauts. Better to let them be killed in the war... 🔨

🚬 A-1 🚬
Post Reply

Return to “The Deep, Dark Cellar”