Robby,
you ask...
Robby (imported) wrote: Sun Dec 19, 2004 8:02 pm
Scott Peterson was never found with physical evidence in the killing of his wife. Yet we see by your posting, there are crazy people who could do such acts of violence. What say you A-1, could someone have killed Scott's wife just like the story you posted?
"Could" is a test of probability, Robby. I "could" win the lottery. I "could" hump the 20-something little wench in the next block and she "could" fall madly in love with my potbelly and semi-soft prick...
Getting my drift?
Somebody "could" have killed Laci Peterson and took her child, I suppose. However, if they did, the motive would be to steal the baby, no?
Then why was the Peterson baby dead also? Why was Laci's body intact if her baby was CUT from her body?
No, Robby, I have seen this too many times. A man's wife comes up dead, they have been having family problems, insurance and/or an extra-maritial affair is involved, or both.
Scott Petersons in this country are more common than mass murderers. The only reason that we are paying attention to Scott Peterson is that he has been cast as fiend du jour by our "National Enquirer" mentality news media.
Really, the son-of-a-bitch did not deserve a passing comment in section C page 12 of a daily po-dunk dinkey times newspaper. If he would have committed his crime in Montgomery Alabama and him and Laci had been black, nobody would have noticed. HE would be doing his time by now, either life or waiting for execution.
Our country is sick that way, too.

A-1
