--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2Beunuch (imported) wrote: Thu Jan 01, 2004 6:58 pm
The Fraj obviously had a depression-related castration fixation. He could have eliminated testosterone from his body several different ways (as apparently he did for awhile). I hope the science of chemical castration advances or is made more available to those who want electivce castration. Already there are advanced chemical castrations involving small subcutaneous shots that lost for an entire year or more (the "Lupron" class of drugs). Right now they are extremely expensive as they are prescribed mostly and mainly for those dying of prostate cancer. So for those people, dropping $1,000 or more per shot is nothing compared to the alternative. But hopefully once the companies are done squeezing the cancer crowd of it's money they'll look to other markets -- like chemical castration of prisoners and hypersexuals. I think a $500 one-shot year-long chemical castration injection would be wonderful for anyone contemplating castration. And for those wanting permanent castration, they could just come in for their yearly shot, maybe make it a New Year's tradition. There are also "immunocastration" technologies on the horizon, already being used in animal studies. This is the "promised land" of castration as far as I can see -- one simple shot that immunizes your body from testosterone, inducing permanent chemical hypogonadism. This simple shot will take the wind out of your sail, the lead out of your pencil, and make having any sort of sexuality completely optional -- you could get testosterone shots of you wish to remain active, if not just do nothing and be happy with your flaccid penis and deactivated testicles. You'll be a completely calm, asexual "stealth eunuch" in the sense that nobody will ever have to know that you've shut down your genitals for good. Just a quick trip to the doctor, one small injection and you'll be impotent within weeks, asexual within months. I think when this technology is widely available castration will be used more and more in a variety of settings and institutions. It could be mandatory for release from prison for sexually violent offenders -- and I would argue it be used upon first offence. A simple shot will eliminate most if not all public objections to castration -- it will percieved more as "treatment" and those who recieve it will consider it treatment as well. Most of the "punishment" of current castration involves the physical removal of the testicles, the main organs of male sexuality. Once males learn they can be asexualized without any surgery or change in external appearence, being castrated will be like getting a flu shot.
************************************************** ******
Reality Check... [
2B, My friend,
This had another name in the early 1900's
It was called eugenics.
Of course, I realize that the verbage is changed significantly, but the effect is the same in the end.
2 legal issues here,
1. Civil Rights Act of 1964
2. 1st Ammendment to the U.S. Constitution.
...and that is without pulling out the law books...there are many others and tons of case law, not to mention Civil Lawsuits where somebody paid victims BIGTIME...
Of course, the Patriot Act notwithstanding, the Supreme Court will never go for this one. Especially in light of the fact that DNA tests have revealed recently that innocent convicts have spent upwards of 20 years in prison doing life terms sometimes eye-witnesses have mis-identified them.
Also, death row inmates have been found innocent because of DNA testing, and no telling what technology might do next. (at least a Jurist may look at it from that standpoint)
It might make a nice story-line though if somebody wants to write it up.
Research is the key, though, take a look here...
http://www.freep.com/news/locway/q5dna26.htm
Not all "RAILROADING" involves diesel locomotives and heavy equipment.
Good Day, gentlemen

A-1
