Why castrates and eunuchs are better for females than males...
-
Westfolding (imported)
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Sat Jun 22, 2002 9:01 pm
-
Posting Rank
Why castrates and eunuchs are better for females than males...
Why are castrates or eunuchs better than males?
Remarks:
Castrate has no testicles only, but has a penis.
Eunuch has nothing at all.
Castratos preferences.
No threat of pregnancy
He is always able
He can pump you in non-stop mode a very long time
His penis is always hard
His testicles dont spank your сunt
He is much more attentive to you
When you touch his crotch, its very unusual
You shouldnt go to wash after sex with him
He never needs a shave
You had never experienced such sensations
Eunuchs preferences.
No threat of pregnancy
He is always able to lick and finger you
He can lick you in non-stop mode endless time
No attempts even to try screwing you up
He is much more attentive to you
When you touch his empty crotch, its very unusual
You shouldnt go to wash after sex with him
A eunuch will never cum in your mouth
He never needs a shave
A eunuch never leaves the seat up
Your relations with him are much warmer than relations with your best friend
You had never experienced such sensations
Remarks:
Castrate has no testicles only, but has a penis.
Eunuch has nothing at all.
Castratos preferences.
No threat of pregnancy
He is always able
He can pump you in non-stop mode a very long time
His penis is always hard
His testicles dont spank your сunt
He is much more attentive to you
When you touch his crotch, its very unusual
You shouldnt go to wash after sex with him
He never needs a shave
You had never experienced such sensations
Eunuchs preferences.
No threat of pregnancy
He is always able to lick and finger you
He can lick you in non-stop mode endless time
No attempts even to try screwing you up
He is much more attentive to you
When you touch his empty crotch, its very unusual
You shouldnt go to wash after sex with him
A eunuch will never cum in your mouth
He never needs a shave
A eunuch never leaves the seat up
Your relations with him are much warmer than relations with your best friend
You had never experienced such sensations
-
Andrew (imported)
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 1787
- Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2001 6:05 am
-
Posting Rank
Re: Why castrates and eunuchs are better for females than males...
Westfolding (imported) wrote: Mon Jun 16, 2003 7:17 pm Castrate has no testicles only, but has a penis.
Eunuch has nothing at all.
That may be your OPINION, but it is certainly not backed up by common usage or the dictionaries. I have a penis, but no testicles. Nonetheless, I am a EUNUCH, defined as a castrated male.
-
Westfolding (imported)
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Sat Jun 22, 2002 9:01 pm
-
Posting Rank
Re: Why castrates and eunuchs are better for females than males...
Dear Andrew,
of course, I respect you very much and I envy you - you wanted to do it and you made it.
But - frankly telling - eunuch is a male without all parts, in opposite case eunuchs weren't in use for female's guard...
Sorry, now I have a few time for reply.
But I promise you to answer with more long mail...
If you are Yahoo-user, my nick there is yasen_ru.
Possibly we could chat in online mode?
I will be glad to see you in Yahoo...
With best regards and great respect
Westfolding
of course, I respect you very much and I envy you - you wanted to do it and you made it.
But - frankly telling - eunuch is a male without all parts, in opposite case eunuchs weren't in use for female's guard...
Sorry, now I have a few time for reply.
But I promise you to answer with more long mail...
If you are Yahoo-user, my nick there is yasen_ru.
Possibly we could chat in online mode?
I will be glad to see you in Yahoo...
With best regards and great respect
Westfolding
-
º¿º (imported)
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2003 8:34 am
-
Posting Rank
Re: Why castrates and eunuchs are better for females than males...
Westfolding,
Andrew is absolutely correct.
According to Webster's dictionary a Eunuch is a castrated man. Also according to Webster's dictionary, to castrate means to remove the testicles. Therefore a man with no testicles is a Eunuch.
I have been a Eunuch for three years so I think I know enough about being a Eunuch to accurately reply to your post. Until a few weeks ago I hadn't taken any HRT. Now I am on 5mg/day of Androderm because I have osteopenia. So far my sex drive has not returned and I hope it doesn't.
No threat of pregnancy
True.
He is always able
Not necessarily.
Not necessarily.
His penis is always hard
Definitely not. In most cases his penis is rarely or never hard.
His testicles don't spank your cunt
Not unless he takes them out of the jar.
He is much more attentive to you
If you mean sexually, then that is not always the case. Many Eunuchs have no interest in sex.
When you touch his crotch, it's very unusual
True.
You shouldn'
Maybe not, but he will probably want to wash after sex with you.
He never needs a shave
Only if he was castrated before puberty.
How would the sensation be any different?
He is always able to lick and finger you
He might be able, but that doesn't mean he wants to.
Eunuchs don't have super endurance. If you had ever licked a pussy before you would know that after a while your mouth gets tired.
He probably wouldn't want to unless he was on HRT. Even then he might not want to.
A eunuch will never cum in your mouth
That isn't necessarily true.
A eunuch never leaves the seat up
Wrong again.
That would depend on the individuals involved.
I hope for your sake you get the fantasy of being a Eunuch separated from the reality of being a Eunuch before you do anything drastic. If you want sex then this probably is not the path for you. If you want to lose your sex drive and get osteopenia or osteoporosis then go for it.
Andrew is absolutely correct.
According to Webster's dictionary a Eunuch is a castrated man. Also according to Webster's dictionary, to castrate means to remove the testicles. Therefore a man with no testicles is a Eunuch.
I have been a Eunuch for three years so I think I know enough about being a Eunuch to accurately reply to your post. Until a few weeks ago I hadn't taken any HRT. Now I am on 5mg/day of Androderm because I have osteopenia. So far my sex drive has not returned and I hope it doesn't.
No threat of pregnancy
True.
He is always able
Not necessarily.
Westfolding (imported) wrote: Mon Jun 16, 2003 7:17 pm He can pump you in non-stop mode a very long time
Not necessarily.
His penis is always hard
Definitely not. In most cases his penis is rarely or never hard.
His testicles don't spank your cunt
Not unless he takes them out of the jar.
He is much more attentive to you
If you mean sexually, then that is not always the case. Many Eunuchs have no interest in sex.
When you touch his crotch, it's very unusual
True.
You shouldn'
Maybe not, but he will probably want to wash after sex with you.
He never needs a shave
Only if he was castrated before puberty.
How would the sensation be any different?
He is always able to lick and finger you
He might be able, but that doesn't mean he wants to.
Westfolding (imported) wrote: Mon Jun 16, 2003 7:17 pm He can lick you in non-stop mode endless time
Eunuchs don't have super endurance. If you had ever licked a pussy before you would know that after a while your mouth gets tired.
He probably wouldn't want to unless he was on HRT. Even then he might not want to.
A eunuch will never cum in your mouth
That isn't necessarily true.
A eunuch never leaves the seat up
Wrong again.
Westfolding (imported) wrote: Mon Jun 16, 2003 7:17 pm Your relations with him are much warmer than relations with your best friend
That would depend on the individuals involved.
I hope for your sake you get the fantasy of being a Eunuch separated from the reality of being a Eunuch before you do anything drastic. If you want sex then this probably is not the path for you. If you want to lose your sex drive and get osteopenia or osteoporosis then go for it.
-
Tomas (imported)
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 173
- Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2002 7:14 pm
-
Posting Rank
Re: Why castrates and eunuchs are better for females than males...
Of course, Websters also now says "ain't" is a word and "irregardless" ...
It reflects usage rather than being a definitive compendium of words.
The meaning of "eunuch" or "eunuchos" or whatever has been different over time and cultures. In China, Westfolding would have been 100% correct. In some other cultures he probably would have been, also.
I tend to prefer (and that's all it is, a preference) the older definitions that had different words for castration and emasculation: Castrato and Eunucho. I don't get all excited about folks using "eunuch" for castrati, expecially since the latter seems less, uh, "elegant" to some, even though more descriptive.
Personally, even though modern usage has totally blurred the usage, I tend to like the differentiation offered by using different words for the different results.
In the mean time, Webster's is God's Word to some so ...
http://home.earthlink.net/~imagepool/tomsig03.gif
http://home.earthlink.net/~imagepool/MFZ.gif (http://home.earthlink.net/~imagepool/denied.html)
It reflects usage rather than being a definitive compendium of words.
The meaning of "eunuch" or "eunuchos" or whatever has been different over time and cultures. In China, Westfolding would have been 100% correct. In some other cultures he probably would have been, also.
I tend to prefer (and that's all it is, a preference) the older definitions that had different words for castration and emasculation: Castrato and Eunucho. I don't get all excited about folks using "eunuch" for castrati, expecially since the latter seems less, uh, "elegant" to some, even though more descriptive.
Personally, even though modern usage has totally blurred the usage, I tend to like the differentiation offered by using different words for the different results.
In the mean time, Webster's is God's Word to some so ...
http://home.earthlink.net/~imagepool/tomsig03.gif
http://home.earthlink.net/~imagepool/MFZ.gif (http://home.earthlink.net/~imagepool/denied.html)
-
ALLREADYDONE (imported)
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Thu Jan 30, 2003 2:10 am
-
Posting Rank
Re: Why castrates and eunuchs are better for females than males...
Westfolding there was a reason harem guards had their balls removed. Because it was unlikely that they would be able to acheive a errection powerfull enough to have intercourse with women. You won't see many eunuchs with one of thoes errections that strech the skin tight with the swollen head pointing tward his chin. Even in the company of naked aroused women the eunuch will be soft or mabie if he is luckey slightly swolen but unable to penatrate even a very wet lady. Castration works, if I had a harem I would feel safe with a eunuch watching over even the most sexually aroused women.
-
C van D (imported)
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 215
- Joined: Tue May 13, 2003 10:16 pm
-
Posting Rank
Re: Why castrates and eunuchs are better for females than males...
Unsure where Westfolding gets his definitions from. Chinese court eunuchs lost everything. So did the black eunuchs of the Ottoman empire, whereas the white eunuchs only had their balls taken out, as a rule before puberty (this inhibited penile growth). As for the castrati of 17th century Italy these did not have their balls taken right out as a rule; the practice was to sever or crush the spermatic cords, so that the balls dried up. Your latest correspondent suggests that harem guards would be unable to get full erections. Can I refer him to the 1001 Nights and the story of Bukhayt, the first eunuch. He gets his balls taken out at age 13 but goes on screwing the girl for years!
C van D
C van D
-
robi (imported)
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2003 11:12 am
-
Posting Rank
Re: Why castrates and eunuchs are better for females than males...
C van D (imported) wrote: Sun Jun 29, 2003 10:40 pm Unsure where Westfolding gets his definitions from. Chinese court eunuchs lost everything. So did the black eunuchs of the Ottoman empire, whereas the white eunuchs only had their balls taken out, as a rule before puberty (this inhibited penile growth). As for the castrati of 17th century Italy these did not have their balls taken right out as a rule; the practice was to sever or crush the spermatic cords, so that the balls dried up. Your latest correspondent suggests that harem guards would be unable to get full erections. Can I refer him to the 1001 Nights and the story of Bukhayt, the first eunuch. He gets his balls taken out at age 13 but goes on screwing the girl for years!
C van D
But Eunuchs have some disadvantages, they are goin to be fat - in most case. And I think this is very bad for his healthness.
How does a Eunuch keep his body in strenght? And he never - not with testosteron-injection - get a hard cock?
robi
Re: Why castrates and eunuchs are better for females than males...
robi (imported) wrote: Tue Jul 01, 2003 3:20 pm But Eunuchs have some disadvantages, they are goin to be fat - in most case. And I think this is very bad for his healthness.
How does a Eunuch keep his body in strenght? And he never - not with testosteron-injection - get a hard cock?
robi
The problem with body fat is the combination of diet and lack of exercise.
Processed modern foods, not just fast foods, are loaded with complex carbohydrates and sugars. They may be fat free, but that doesn't help. As the Atkins diet states (and it's true, I know), when all those carbs and sugars hit a body that isn't that active, it turns into fat.
When I was teenager, and struggling with puberty that just wasn't working, I was about as round as I was tall. In the 6th grade, I wore 36" pants. The cure? Exercise - mowing the lawn, riding a bike, cutting wood, etc., and no sugars. No rooty vegetables. No soda. No bread. That left meat and leafy veggies. Over the summer, I lost like 50 pounds. (I still got the long arms and had a little pot belly that was hard to get rid of, though. God, the hell I took over that!)
The popular Atkins diet states basically the same thing about weight loss.
You also have to watch that calcium intake. Eunuchs are subject to brittle bones, you know. I found this out (being hypogonadic) by punching out my old truck and breaking my hand in the process! Some years before, I beat the windshield out of my Mustang Gt with my bare hands and didn't bat an eye over it.
As for the hard cock, well, it varies from person to person.
-
Andrew (imported)
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 1787
- Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2001 6:05 am
-
Posting Rank
Re: Why castrates and eunuchs are better for females than males...
robi (imported) wrote: Tue Jul 01, 2003 3:20 pm But Eunuchs have some disadvantages, they are goin to be fat - in most case. And I think this is very bad for his healthness.
How does a Eunuch keep his body in strenght? And he never - not with testosteron-injection - get a hard cock?
robi
First off, the eunuch cannot build up the muscle mass of an intact male, true. He is like a woman in this respect. And like a lot of women, he can have respectable weight and muscles from a proper diet and exercise program. You should see my aerobics and yoga instructers.
As for not getting an erection without testosterone injection --- MAYBE. YMWV = Your Milage Will Vary. It will depend on age at castration, how long you have been castrated, how much testosterone and estrogen your adrenal glands are putting out, and other factors poorly understood.
In my case, as a modest example, I was castrated at age 56. Nowadays I can, if I want to, masturbate every couple of months, get a usefull erection, and have a dry orgasm. Nice, but not essential. And if I wanted to ignore sex altogether, I could do so without physical discomfort.