Sileta11 (imported) wrote: Wed Mar 15, 2023 9:58 am Well, I will have no choice but to go back to estrogen
I still don't understand why many eunuchs were centenarians if they didn't take hormones
There are some issues that males are more subject to than females, which is why you see females living longer currently - castration especially pre-puberty, possibly as late as the 30's, less so later avoids many of them....
Also bone health is impacted by physical activity - and just the basic functions of staying alive before the industrial revolution took a LOT more physical activity when we didn't have all the modern conveniences... A few other factors, I'm not sure how much they played into it, but there would have been an inherent filtering for healthier sorts just by who SURVIVED the surgery w/o modern infection control, and surgical techniques.
I also suspect that there is a certain amount of reporting bias in that the eunuchs we have records about will be the "upper class" ones that were important enough to have something written about them, and that presumably means they had the 'better things in life' like better diets, healthier living conditions, better medical care (such as it was) etc. I don't think we have much data on the lower grade slaves / harem guards / etc. that probably had lifespans closer to the average non chopped folks....
So no question that SOME historical eunuchs had far longer lives than average, but I suspect that the records are seriously skewed in their favor and don't do a good job of reflecting reality...
WheelyCurious