The fine line

[calamity (imported)]

IV noticed that there seems to be a very fine line with stories involving minors on here and the line seams to be a lot finer since all the stories started to slowly move over to the new site....

I can't speak for others but my favourite stories are actually the ones involving men who indulge in there pedo fantasy's and end up being neutered because of it...

That being said I'm more into the castration scenes more then the pedo scenes at the start of the stories...but at the same time I also think that the sex scenes tend to set up the stories really well...

For example "hot tub hottie" and "pervert punishment". "Daddy gets punished"

Without the sexual parts at the start these stories are basically just a girl neutering the guys for very little reason....

Now this is just my personal opinion here I know everyone views things differently. But there can't be good without evil in the world...

I'm also curious how the mods determine the difference in pedo stories that just shouldn't exist and fantasy/castration stories that have strong pedo themes in them.

I will point out that I do agree with the mods and I think they're doing an amazing job keeping this place going all these years and I'm very thankful for all of you!

[calamity (imported)]

Also...I think my phone prefers pesos more the pedo...damn autocorrect really got in good on that post haha

[Paolo]

Also...I think my phone prefers pesos more the pedo...damn autocorrect really got in good on that post haha

Fixed the typo for you.

More on this later!

[wasala92 (imported)]

As far as I have followed the discussion, this has been talked about many times. But I still don't agree with the current policy.

I appreciate the role and hard work of the moderators here. Still, I think they have made their lives much harder by not completely banning the use of minor characters in the archive. In my opinion, it wouldn't take anything away from the archive and would significantly reduce a huge source of discomfort for members and contributors like myself. A clear signal in this direction, would be a warning to those who are looking for that kind of content, that this isn't the place for that.

[Valery_V (imported)]

As far as I have followed the discussion, this has been talked about many times. But I still don't agree with the current policy.

I appreciate the role and hard work of the moderators here. Still, I think they have made their lives much harder by not completely banning the use of minor characters in the archive. In my opinion, it wouldn't take anything away from the archive and would significantly reduce a huge source of discomfort for members and contributors like myself. A clear signal in this direction, would be a warning to those who are looking for that kind of content, that this isn't the place for that.

It's not entirely clear what you're proposing to ban completely?

By the way, what is acceptable to express in your fantasy stories in the EA art library is sometimes completely unacceptable to present as a real case on the forums!

[wasala92 (imported)]

Stories involving minor aged characters

Again, I don't run and do the hard work of moderating this forum and know that this has been discussed ad nauseum. And I appreciate thehard work of those that do. But for me that would be a clear policy

[Losethem (imported)]

I'd personally like to see the minor stories gone, at least where the "hero" is a minor. Those stories where a person discusses their desire having been going on at least as far back as childhood doesn't bother me, so long as if they are the "hero" the surgical events happen when they're an adult. After all, many of us who have done these things in reality knew that this is what we wanted/needed when we were children.

However, I do not own the archive, so it's not my decision if these stories stay or go.

This said, I did a story count a while back and we'd lose fully 1/3 of the story archive if we removed stories that have a "minor" tag on them. While I'm fine with many of those going, I'd think a top-down review to see WHY the minor tag is on the story would be warranted. IE, is the tag applied because minors were mentioned or is the minor the "hero"? There is a significant difference in the two.

[WheelyFixed]

I have very mixed feelings about the minor stories - certainly we have a LOT of them as LT pointed out... I also think that it is worth noting that while there are plenty of questionable "literary merit" they also include a lot of what I think is some of the best writing in the archive, and I don't say that just because some of the authors are also mods...

I consider the Blue Creek stories, and many of the Neutersol stories to be good enough to be 'commercially publishable' grade in terms of writing quality....

I think the tags are sort of problematic in general as I find there seems to be very little reliable relationship between the tags and the story... Particularly I notice a lot of stories w/ "Straight" tags, but including a lot of gay sex (and often no straight sex)

As I've said before, I have a general preference for stories that are longer and are about more than just the actual surgery... So I don't find a story w/ little more in it than 'put junior on the table and chop' particularly interesting..... However I don't necessarily have or see why there would be a big issue with one where Junior is the "Hero" if there is a good bit more about why, or what happens after and similar.... It also seems that many of the basic plot lines require that the Hero be a minor because otherwise they wouldn't make sense....

I have no idea how to make such a test, but it seems to me that there is a big difference between a story where it's just 'erotica' to be castrating a minor vs. one where it isn't the primary focus but is a necessary element of a larger piece.

WheelyFixed