Stealth Versus Traditional Nullification. The desire to be a Stealth Boy.

[Atreyu69 (imported)]

If as a ten to twelve year old boy I'd been offered the option of having a traditional nullification there's only about a 1 or 2 percent chance that I'd have said yes. However if I'd been offered a stealth nullification (genitals rendered dysfunctional but outward appearance unchanged) there's maybe a ten to fifteen precent chance that I'd have agreed to the surgery.

From what I've been told in a stealth nullification the balls are replaced with fake one, a nerve is cut to insure impotence and a new pee hole is created under the scrotum.

So what's the appeal of being a stealth boy? No need for a jock and no pain when kicked down there. No messy wet dreams, no inappropriate and embarrassing erections. No uncontrollable desire to whack off. In short I wouldn't be a slave to my stinger.

But at the same time I'd be able to go naked whenever and where ever any intact boy does and no one would suspect a thing. I'd be a complete eunuch but able to pass as a boy in any school locker room or on any nude beach.

It's what they call, Having your cake and eating it too.

If anyone has any opinions on that matter that they'd like to share I'd love to hear them.

[cutnbulls2ox (imported)]

Your idea would work until you reached the ages when puberty would normally take place. Then you d either need to take artificial testosterone to look like males your age and a maturing male, or you would be outed as neutered.

But among grown men, I bet offering fake balls and maintenance steroids would get more men willing to secretly get themselves castrated. As long as they appeared to be within the range of normal adult masculinity, more men would feel more comfortable with being volunarily cut.

[Valery_V (imported)]

Damn! Something similar happened to me. But nevertheless I refused artificial genitals. I just ran away from the doctor who suggested me to attach all this .

[T van Keel (imported)]

This idea would have never been an option for me. Turning my genitals into something non-functional wouldn't have made much difference to having intact genitals. It was always the male appearance down there and being uncomfortable with the genitals in whole what made me want to become a nullo.

Maybe a nice idea for a few, but in my case absolutely the wrong way. If I knew as a teen the things I know now it might have happened that I had chosen to become a nullo at that age already, but probably with T replacement.

[TopManFL (imported)]

If as a ten to twelve year old boy I'd been offered the option of having a traditional nullification there's only about a 1 or 2 percent chance that I'd have said yes. However if I'd been offered a stealth nullification (genitals rendered dysfunctional but outward appearance unchanged) there's maybe a ten to fifteen precent chance that I'd have agreed to the surgery.

From what I've been told in a stealth nullification the balls are replaced with fake one, a nerve is cut to insure impotence and a new pee hole is created under the scrotum.

So what's the appeal of being a stealth boy? No need for a jock and no pain when kicked down there. No messy wet dreams, no inappropriate and embarrassing erections. No uncontrollable desire to whack off. In short I wouldn't be a slave to my stinger.

But at the same time I'd be able to go naked whenever and where ever any intact boy does and no one would suspect a thing. I'd be a complete eunuch but able to pass as a boy in any school locker room or on any nude beach.

It's what they call, Having your cake and eating it too.

If anyone has any opinions on that matter that they'd like to share I'd love to hear them.

There could be a problem if you had gone into a men's room and the only facilities available were urinals. Making a pee would require sitting down.

The psychological cluster fuck of knowing you did not have functioning male genitals combined with the requirement that you dress like a boy, use the boy's bathroom, take gym class with the boys, and most likely need to ask a girl to the school dance

would make an interesting fiction story (hint, hint).

Your idea would work until you reached the ages when puberty would normally take place. Then you d either need to take artificial testosterone to look like males your age and a maturing male, or you would be outed as neutered.

But among grown men, I bet offering fake balls and maintenance steroids would get more men willing to secretly get themselves castrated. As long as they appeared to be within the range of normal adult masculinity, more me

n would feel more comfortable with being volunarily cut.

Puberty could be taken care of with hormones. Plus, with the right mixture of hormones, genital size and body hair could be controlled exactly. Of course, storing sperm as a fertility treatment would not be possible since the testicles would have been removed before puberty.

---

The neurectomy to numb the penis is an idea rarely explored on here.

TMFL

[Paolo]

From what I've been told in a stealth nullification the balls are replaced with fake one, a nerve is cut to insure impotence and a new pee hole is created under the scrotum.

I thought you already wrote one along these lines, where the boy finds out he and his little brother had this done by their mother? They went to the doctor, were knocked out, and then it was done without their knowing. He's with some other kids, at a party or something, and he finds out about erections, stimulation, etc., and finds out that his not feeling anything isn't normal. His uncle or someone then confirms it for him?

[OneBallBoi (imported)]

This is what Luvpain99 talked about and wanted many many years ago. He had sourced out a place to purchase fake testicles.

[Losethem (imported)]

I feel much like T van Keel, only he didn't specify it. Frankly, that ISN'T nullification. The parts are still there except the testicles. There are so many people out there that have this idea that you can be a nullo and still have all the parts. That's not how nullification works. Nullification is, at the least, the absence of external male genitalia (in the case of males), of a male who had them at birth, and has had them removed but still present male. There can be some variation on this, but generally you need to be missing the parts to give yourself the label of nullo.

[magusuk89 (imported)]

I feel much like T van Keel, only he didn't specify it. Frankly, that ISN'T nullification. The parts are still there except the testicles. There are so many people out there that have this idea that you can be a nullo and still have all the parts. That's not how nullification works. Nullification is, at the least, the absence of external male genitalia (in the case of males), of a male who had them at birth, and has had them removed but still present male. There can be some variation on this, but generally you need to be missing the parts to give yourself the label of nullo.

Yes... not to disrespect guys who get prostheses, but I think wrt my own thoughts anticipating orchidectomy, I think you only really live eunuch-ness socially if it's evident in the sauna, at the beach etc. Some people set a lot of store by hormones as the distinction, but I think really the visual (tactile?) aspect of it has a lot more valency in the social arena. This authenticity and sense of community, heritage and solidarity is why I have decided I won't get prostheses when I finally get fixed.

[CircItaly (imported)]

In a fiction the only reason this thing would have sense, is keeping the kid in the dark until his peers hit the puberty