My questions about testicle transplants

[rogerwpbfl (imported)]

My balls on another dude and vice versa. It's kinda hot to think about. But I have questions about its outcome.

Would my transplanted balls continue to carry my DNA and deliver my DNA thru the new owner's penis and into his waiting partner, to create my offspring? Or, would my transplanted nuts just become a "factory" for the new owner's sperm and his DNA after a few weeks or months hanging from their new home between his legs?

If a nutless dude is lucky enough to acquire a donor set of balls, is he then capable of producing his own offspring with his own DNA? Or, would he be shooting loads of DNA matched to the now nutless donor?

Who knows how this would work, if it were possible? 3... 2... 1... Go!

[cutnbulls2ox (imported)]

The basic cell structures in each testicle would stay the DNA of the man whose body first grew those testicles as an embryo. His DNA first created those sperm factories. And all of the sperm creating cells packed inside each ball would retain his DNA in producing all of the sperm ever created by his balls. Unless some as yet undiscovered DNA cell replacement gets invented.

After the transplant to another man, the testicle cells would still have the first ball grower s DNA and be kept alive and nourished by the new man s blood and body systems. But it would continue to be the original ball grower s DNA cells inside the testicle that keep producing new sperm cells with half of the original ball growers DNA in each sperm. And the female egg would supply the other half of a new baby s DNA from the woman s DNA.

It is also interesting that it is always the sperm alone that decides the baby s sex. Only men s sperm is male or female. The female egg is always sex neutral and waiting for the male sperm or female sperm that fertilizes the egg to decide the sex of the baby.

I read that ancient Greeks and Romans thought each ball might produce only male seeds or only female seeds. Men volunteered to get one testicle cut off to try producing only sons. After many failed attempts, they discovered that both balls produce both male sperm and female sperm. But men eagerly lined up trying to get half gelded to choose the sex of their babies.

Any men complaining about the sex of their babies can only blame their own sperm for which sex each baby is. The woman only produces a sex neutral egg.

The ball transplant recipient would be shooting out sperm with the original ball grower s DNA in every sperm that those balls ever produced.

You should look into becoming a sperm donor at a sperm bank or university clinic. I m sure infertile couples and women without a male partner would line up to receive your handsome, hung, young, stud sperm.

Its much easier to jack off into plastic cups in a sperm bank twice a week and get paid about $100 per ejaculation for it, than to get your balls cut off for risky transplanting ! Some men get paid even more for their sperm. I hear one man is earning $250 per ejaculation now. I bet you would be the only sperm donor in the world offering such large penis DNA for people s sons to inherit and enjoy in their lives. The dads would be lobbying to pick you as their sperm donor on that important DNA alone.

[rogerwpbfl (imported)]

The basic cell structures in each testicle would stay the DNA of the man whose body first grew those testicles as an embryo. His DNA first created those sperm factories. And all of the sperm creating cells packed inside each ball would retain his DNA in producing all of the sperm ever created by his balls. Unless some as yet undiscovered DNA cell replacement gets invented.

After the transplant to another man, the testicle cells would still have the first ball grower s DNA and be kept alive and nourished by the new man s blood and body systems. But it would continue to be the original ball grower s DNA cells inside the testicle that keep producing new sperm cells with half of the original ball growers DNA in each sperm. And the female egg would supply the other half of a new baby s DNA from the woman s DNA.

It is also interesting that it is always the sperm alone that decides the baby s sex. Only men s sperm is male or female. The female egg is always sex neutral and waiting for the male sperm or female sperm that fertilizes the egg to decide the sex of the baby.

I read that ancient Greeks and Romans thought each ball might produce only male seeds or only female seeds. Men volunteered to get one testicle cut off to try producing only sons. After many failed attempts, they discovered that both balls produce both male sperm and female sperm. But men eagerly lined up trying to get half gelded to choose the sex of their babies.

Any men complaining about the sex of their babies can only blame their own sperm for which sex each baby is. The woman only produces a sex neutral egg.

The ball transplant recipient would be shooting out sperm with the original ball grower s DNA in every sperm that those balls ever produced.

You should look into becoming a sperm donor at a sperm bank or university clinic. I m sure infertile couples and women without a male partner would line up to receive your handsome, hung, young, stud sperm.

Its much easier to jack off into plastic cups in a sperm bank twice a week and get paid about $100 per ejaculation for it, than to get your balls cut off for risky transplanting ! Some men get paid even more for their sperm. I hear one man is earning $250 per ejaculation now. I bet you would be the only sperm donor in the world offering such large penis DNA for people s sons to inherit and enjoy in their lives. The dads would be lobbying to pick you as their sperm donor on that important DNA alone.

Sounds like you think I can sell my spunk as a "highly evolved" specimen. Kinda makes me like a prized stallion LOL

So I have one uncle who has nothing but daughters (4 girls) and another uncle -- same side of family -- who has nothing but sons (3 boys). Weird how each fathered several children, but each man's children were either all male or all female. I wonder if there's any science to explain that?

[erikboy (imported)]

If I am correct, it is technically doable. And I think it is tested on animals if I am correct. But nobody would do that on humans. Due to the ethics.

[JessicaH (imported)]

Sex distribution is not as random as you think. Although male sperm is about 50/50 for male and female, the egg has a mechanism to chose. It’s not simply the first sperm to arrive. About a third of women have mostly boys, a third mostly girls and another third is for both sexes.

[zeebster (imported)]

My balls on another dude and vice versa. It's kinda hot to think about. But I have questions about its outcome.

Would my transplanted balls continue to carry my DNA and deliver my DNA thru the new owner's penis and into his waiting partner, to create my offspring? Or, would my transplanted nuts just become a "factory" for the new owner's sperm and his DNA after a few weeks or months hanging from their new home between his legs?

If a nutless dude is lucky enough to acquire a donor set of balls, is he then capable of producing his own offspring with his own DNA? Or, would he be shooting loads of DNA matched to the now nutless donor?

Who knows how this would work, if it were possible? 3... 2... 1... Go!

You know I've been around here for a number of years now and have appreciated the input I received prior to my Orchiectomy as well as my total Penectomy.

That said; this has GOT to be the DUMBEST TROLL question ever!

Why are you guys indulging him??????

[JesusA (imported)]

As far as I can tell from the medical literature, there's only ever been ONE successful testicle transplant, though there have been many attempts. The one success was between identical twin brothers. One was born with testicles, the other was born anorchic -- identical except for the lack of testicles (a rare condition, but well-attested in the literature). The anorchic one was pushed through puberty with testosterone injections to match his twin. As adults, after the one twin had fathered more than one child (three, I think), he offered a transplant to his married, but testicle-less brother. It was an eight hour surgery with the two of them on adjacent operating tables and a large team of surgeons and other medical personnel. The transplant was a success, and the wife of the previously anorchic brother eventually gave birth to a child. Since the sperm came from the testicled brother's testicles, a simple sperm donation would have been far simpler and would have produced the identical result.

[Chesleyt (imported)]

I've asked about it and it's an ethical issue because of the donors procreative process not being under his control. Most donors would have been from organ donors and without their concent it's ethically wrong in the medical fields opinion. Plus they say that's easier to just give the man testosterone and there's always sperm donors also there's the issue of rejection of the foreign tissue. You would have to be on medication to stop your immune system from attacking it.

[grapesoda19 (imported)]

You know I've been around here for a number of years now and have appreciated the input I received prior to my Orchiectomy as well as my total Penectomy.

That said; this has GOT to be the DUMBEST TROLL question ever!

Why are you guys indulging him??????

Actually, that's a question I always wanted to know the answer to as well. It's not always trolling to ask a question, even if it might be a "dumbest troll question" to you, some don't know the answer.

To paraphrase Ramon Bautista, "The only [dumb] question is the question that is never asked."

[TopManFL (imported)]

You know I've been around here for a number of years now and have appreciated the input I received prior to my Orchiectomy as well as my total Penectomy.

That said; this has GOT to be the DUMBEST TROLL question ever!

Why are you guys indulging him??????

Hummm, because it's Roger and he has a great reputation in the community.

Plus, it was posted in Eunuch Central, which is a sub-forum for things that don't fit elsewhere.