Atreyu69 (imported) wrote: Thu Aug 16, 2018 10:21 am I know what you mean. At that age a boy understands what he's in for and (assuming it wasn't forced on him) he goes in for it willingly.
It seems sort of like a first step on the way to have having more stuff removed.![]()
As a pre puberty boy, I didn t think much of animal castrations or of my circumcised penis. They were just normal and how things were. The men and boys around me all took it as normal and didn t question either being done. Before puberty most boys just thought our balls and dicks weren t of much use or value except to have kids with when we grew up. Kissing and sex were mush, sissy, and nothing we wanted anything to do with. Selling us on getting our balls castrated at that age would have been pretty easy to do. Our main objections at that pre puberty age would be about never having any kids and not wanting to miss out on growing big and strong and missing out on being able to grow beards and hairy chests when we grew up.
We had no concept of the thrills and intense pleasures of sex that our penis and testicles would give us with puberty and the joys of intense sex drives and loving everything to do with sex that puberty with balls in our bags would later give us.
But I definitely agree that once anyone starts cutting off parts of our sex organs, like in circumcision, it probably does break down barriers and help make a male more willing and interested in getting more cut on his sex organs throughout his life. I m guessing even more after he is done using his balls, penis, and sperm to have all the kids he wants. Then giving them up or getting more modifications doesn t have that useful in reproduction barrier holding men back any longer.