Circumcisions taking more and more skin off down the penis shafts now ?
-
madnomadtoo (imported)
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2017 11:49 am
-
Posting Rank
Re: Circumcisions taking more and more skin off down the penis shafts now ?
I had an uncomfortable foreskin and had a circumcision at age 25. A lot of the inner tissue was left, but this tissue is mature. When wrinkled up in a flaccid state it still produced smegma, with the odor now more obvious. When I went for a revision years later because of this, a very unempathetic doctor removed all of the inner membrane! I now have a very unsensitive penis, and wish I still had the old uncomfortable foreskin. Ve ist too shoone oldt und too late shmart.
-
UKmalesmallpenis (imported)
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2017 2:10 pm
-
Posting Rank
Re: Circumcisions taking more and more skin off down the penis shafts now ?
Interesting thread, like I think I posted elsewhere last year, I was circumcised just a few weeks before I turned 12, shortly after I had started high school in the UK. I had already started to enjoy masturbation and orgasms and clearly remember how great it felt to have a foreskin, especially masturbating in bed thrusting down onto the mattress.
My circumcision was unexpected, after apparently having had some urinary difficulties and I remember dreading the weeks leading up to the operation after I was told I would be getting it done. It was actually sprung on me the day of the operation when my dad produced a letter and explained that today was the day, I genuinely didn't expect it to be that day. The whole procedure was horrendous, the pain was excruciating for the hours after the operation, my penis kept bleeding and nurses put a dry dressing on a wet wound, which resulted in more pain and discomfort. It tooks weeks to heal and worse still, immediately after the operation and for several days afterwards the glans became infected with a white mass which made urinating difficult - cream had to be applied to get rid of the infection.
After a couple of weeks, I went back to school but was extremely conscious about people finding out - luckily nobody ever did (we did not have to undress and hit the showers at school). The operation has left an indelible mark on my psyche, it is the defining 'underlying trauma' or the 'year zero' for subsequent (and current) problems with anxiety, anger, obsessive compulsive disorder and more significantly deep seated insecurities around intimacy and sex with women - linked to lifelong erectile dysfunction, premature ejaculation and development of multiple paraphilias around being degraded, humiliation and obviously genital modification.
My circumcision was unexpected, after apparently having had some urinary difficulties and I remember dreading the weeks leading up to the operation after I was told I would be getting it done. It was actually sprung on me the day of the operation when my dad produced a letter and explained that today was the day, I genuinely didn't expect it to be that day. The whole procedure was horrendous, the pain was excruciating for the hours after the operation, my penis kept bleeding and nurses put a dry dressing on a wet wound, which resulted in more pain and discomfort. It tooks weeks to heal and worse still, immediately after the operation and for several days afterwards the glans became infected with a white mass which made urinating difficult - cream had to be applied to get rid of the infection.
After a couple of weeks, I went back to school but was extremely conscious about people finding out - luckily nobody ever did (we did not have to undress and hit the showers at school). The operation has left an indelible mark on my psyche, it is the defining 'underlying trauma' or the 'year zero' for subsequent (and current) problems with anxiety, anger, obsessive compulsive disorder and more significantly deep seated insecurities around intimacy and sex with women - linked to lifelong erectile dysfunction, premature ejaculation and development of multiple paraphilias around being degraded, humiliation and obviously genital modification.
-
cutnbulls2ox (imported)
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 1521
- Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 3:01 am
-
Posting Rank
Re: Circumcisions taking more and more skin off down the penis shafts now ?
What a terrible experience for you UKmalesmallpenis. So much for cirs being so simple and healthy for boys to go thru versus grown men. A rotten way to put you through it all around. No wonder it affected you badly. Just when you re starting to enjoy jacking off with a full foreskin to stroke so great with, and it gets chopped off and then also infected. Pain and humiliation being exposed, cut, and your infected penis looking damaged and being handled by strangers as a shy kid to make it worse.
You Brits are usually smarter and stay uncut. What was the cut versus uncut percentage when you eere a kid ? Mostly uncut I m guessing. Not like past Americans cutting any chance they got.
But its improving a lot here in the US. More parents are leaving their sons intact and letting their sons decide for themselves later in life. As it should be. Now there are so many uncut dicks on younger guys that its ok to be cut or uncut in schools today.
You must be among the fewer cut men in the UK ? Any feedback from people on your circ after you got cut and having lived with a circed penis ever since ?
Sorry to hear it affected you so much. Its sure understandable that it would.
You Brits are usually smarter and stay uncut. What was the cut versus uncut percentage when you eere a kid ? Mostly uncut I m guessing. Not like past Americans cutting any chance they got.
But its improving a lot here in the US. More parents are leaving their sons intact and letting their sons decide for themselves later in life. As it should be. Now there are so many uncut dicks on younger guys that its ok to be cut or uncut in schools today.
You must be among the fewer cut men in the UK ? Any feedback from people on your circ after you got cut and having lived with a circed penis ever since ?
Sorry to hear it affected you so much. Its sure understandable that it would.
-
UKmalesmallpenis (imported)
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2017 2:10 pm
-
Posting Rank
Re: Circumcisions taking more and more skin off down the penis shafts now ?
cutnbulls, I am happy to talk about my circumcision and how it has affected me as an adult at great length - I am still fixated on it all, particularly the appearance of my 'mutilated' penis, the seemingly permanent erectile dysfunction and premature ejaculation I sadly am afflicted with. I was examining my circ scar earlier, it is quite large and there are ugly bits of skin that look like growths around the scar itself. The frenulum is quite thick and has no sensation whatsoever, the skin of my penis when erect always feels really tight and the circ scar seems pretty large.
When flaccid the head is actually bigger than the shaft, which resembles only a small amount of crumpled skin. The head and glans get really dry and I need a lot of stimulation to get hard - years of masturbating rubbing against bedding and mattresses etc. means that the rare times I have had vaginal intercourse with a woman, I have found it hard to keep it erect.
When I was at school, there was only one other guy who was circumcised and he got teased - thankfully nobody ever found out that I had had it done.
I feel a lot of people feel surprised when they find out I have been circumcised - not many guys at all in the UK who have been cut. British women expect an uncut guy and I think a lot feel cut penises are weird or ugly looking - women over here are particular about size and stamina too.
Any further questions, feel free to ask.
When flaccid the head is actually bigger than the shaft, which resembles only a small amount of crumpled skin. The head and glans get really dry and I need a lot of stimulation to get hard - years of masturbating rubbing against bedding and mattresses etc. means that the rare times I have had vaginal intercourse with a woman, I have found it hard to keep it erect.
When I was at school, there was only one other guy who was circumcised and he got teased - thankfully nobody ever found out that I had had it done.
I feel a lot of people feel surprised when they find out I have been circumcised - not many guys at all in the UK who have been cut. British women expect an uncut guy and I think a lot feel cut penises are weird or ugly looking - women over here are particular about size and stamina too.
Any further questions, feel free to ask.
-
CircItaly (imported)
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 222
- Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2017 4:27 am
-
Posting Rank
Re: Circumcisions taking more and more skin off down the penis shafts now ?
I had a very similar experience. This stuff fuck up my mind forever
-
cutnbulls2ox (imported)
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 1521
- Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 3:01 am
-
Posting Rank
Re: Circumcisions taking more and more skin off down the penis shafts now ?
Since males of every age are all either circumcised or not circumcised, you d think males would discuss it way more and get a chance to compare cut versus uncut penises to decide which they like best.
Instead, men and boys rarely discuss circumcision and unless bi or gay, most males NEVER get to compare or handle or see orgasms and ejaculations of cut and uncut penises. Its such a taboo to compare and take any close up look and feel other male s penises. The people, male and female, deciding whether to circumcise male penises rarely ever have any experience closely examining or using both cut and uncut penises to even know the many differences between them ! Ignorance in the decision makers ! They don t even know what they are dealing with.
Mostly its just the dumb old excuses to decide to circumcise other male s penises. Religion, tradition, pressure from just plain greedy drs who get paid to cut, or let some underling cut assembly line in hospitals on defenceless infants, medical staff being overbearing and shaming parents who choose to not circumcise. All groundless reasons to circumcise other male s penises without their wanting it.
How many people ever handle and examine cut and uncut penises up close and in detail, before they decide for other males ? How wrong is that ! Ignorance making a lifelong choice for other males !
Instead, men and boys rarely discuss circumcision and unless bi or gay, most males NEVER get to compare or handle or see orgasms and ejaculations of cut and uncut penises. Its such a taboo to compare and take any close up look and feel other male s penises. The people, male and female, deciding whether to circumcise male penises rarely ever have any experience closely examining or using both cut and uncut penises to even know the many differences between them ! Ignorance in the decision makers ! They don t even know what they are dealing with.
Mostly its just the dumb old excuses to decide to circumcise other male s penises. Religion, tradition, pressure from just plain greedy drs who get paid to cut, or let some underling cut assembly line in hospitals on defenceless infants, medical staff being overbearing and shaming parents who choose to not circumcise. All groundless reasons to circumcise other male s penises without their wanting it.
How many people ever handle and examine cut and uncut penises up close and in detail, before they decide for other males ? How wrong is that ! Ignorance making a lifelong choice for other males !
-
TopManFL (imported)
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 924
- Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2016 10:15 am
-
Posting Rank
Re: Circumcisions taking more and more skin off down the penis shafts now ?
Some hospitals make parents of new born boys attend a seminar on circumcision. Where the discuss the pros (amazingly it's almost all pros) and cons of the brutal mutilation of their baby's genitals.
Hospitals make money charging for the procedure. Then, they sell the "donated" foreskin to pharmaceutical companies. They can be used to grow skin grafts for burn patients. They can even be used to create anti-wrinkle cream (look it up).
The seminar is mandatory for all parents of boys to attend.
Then, when they get back to the room, their infant has already had his male genital mutilation procedure done.
The hospitals will claim that attendance at the seminar was the parents permission for the mutilation to take place. Never mind that attendance was said to have been mandatory.
Oh and the profit for the hospital? About $350.00 to $500.00 to "give" the boy a circumcision. Then, $1,500.00 per foreskin to sell the "donated" tissue.
Every baby boy is born with a $2,000.00 coupon on his penis and hospitals are eager to clip it and cash it in.
Hospitals make money charging for the procedure. Then, they sell the "donated" foreskin to pharmaceutical companies. They can be used to grow skin grafts for burn patients. They can even be used to create anti-wrinkle cream (look it up).
The seminar is mandatory for all parents of boys to attend.
Then, when they get back to the room, their infant has already had his male genital mutilation procedure done.
The hospitals will claim that attendance at the seminar was the parents permission for the mutilation to take place. Never mind that attendance was said to have been mandatory.
Oh and the profit for the hospital? About $350.00 to $500.00 to "give" the boy a circumcision. Then, $1,500.00 per foreskin to sell the "donated" tissue.
Every baby boy is born with a $2,000.00 coupon on his penis and hospitals are eager to clip it and cash it in.
-
cutnbulls2ox (imported)
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 1521
- Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 3:01 am
-
Posting Rank
Re: Circumcisions taking more and more skin off down the penis shafts now ?
What a dirty trick on both the parents and the boys. Sounds like criminal fraud and theft if any prosecutor would follow the laws and criminally charge the hospitals for crimes like this.
Now parents will need metal chastity cups for infant sizes for their sons to wear as newborns until they get home to protect their $2000 foreskins from mutilation and theft. Keyed dick protectors with only the parents holding the keys and locked on right after the umbilical cords are snipped off at birth.
Now parents will need metal chastity cups for infant sizes for their sons to wear as newborns until they get home to protect their $2000 foreskins from mutilation and theft. Keyed dick protectors with only the parents holding the keys and locked on right after the umbilical cords are snipped off at birth.
-
TopManFL (imported)
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 924
- Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2016 10:15 am
-
Posting Rank
Re: Circumcisions taking more and more skin off down the penis shafts now ?
Interestingly, a saw an article on Mothers Against Circumcision. In the article they talked about creating printed labels that say "No Circumcision". They pre-place the labels on boxes of diapers they bring with them to the hospital. Many hospitals now keep mother and baby in the same room instead of using nurseries.
In addition to the labels on the front of the diaper, when the baby is changed they place two more labels over the tape tabs on the side of the diaper. So, any doctor or nurse will see the labels.
It's not an uncommon occurrence for nurses to come in and take the baby away for a circumcision while the exhausted mother is sleeping. She did just give birth after all and many of them by C-Section.
One of the mothers on that forum couldn't afford the cost of the box of labels and didn't know how to print labels. She didn't own a computer either.
Here's the kick in the ass, she took a sharpie. The same kind of magic marker every kid eventually uses to write on themselves or their playmate with. The mother wrote "No Circumcision" on the baby's tummy with the sharpie. Seriously, they said on the forum that the hospital called Child Protective Services to report child abuse.
So, the hospital would have considered Male Genital Mutilation fine. But protecting a child from such genital mutilation was serious enough to require a report.
Circumcision is a $40,000,000,000.00 industry in the United States. Between the fees to the parent's insurance, the sale of the "donated" skin and the money paid for the one time circumcision kits it's big industry.
Much like tobacco, the circumcision industry is looking for new markets in other countries. As Americans stopped smoking, the tobacco industry started marketing their products in Asia with great success. Even with the billions they've paid in the US in lawsuits, they have more than made up for it in foreign sales.
The circumcision industry is doing the same. First, they are fighting back with industry paid for reports about "newly found" benefits to circumcision. Then, they are aggressively marketing VMMC (voluntary male medical circumcision) in Africa under the dubious claim supported by a study paid for by the company that makes the one time use circumcision device that HIV spread is 50% less likely from female to male during unprotected sex.
Then, they set a goal of 10,000,000 circumcision a year. Of course, they are falling far short of that goal, which gets local governments to pay for massive "public education" and for "Public Service Ads". Look up http://www.prepex.com Seriously, a more evil marketing scheme has never been created.
In addition to the labels on the front of the diaper, when the baby is changed they place two more labels over the tape tabs on the side of the diaper. So, any doctor or nurse will see the labels.
It's not an uncommon occurrence for nurses to come in and take the baby away for a circumcision while the exhausted mother is sleeping. She did just give birth after all and many of them by C-Section.
One of the mothers on that forum couldn't afford the cost of the box of labels and didn't know how to print labels. She didn't own a computer either.
Here's the kick in the ass, she took a sharpie. The same kind of magic marker every kid eventually uses to write on themselves or their playmate with. The mother wrote "No Circumcision" on the baby's tummy with the sharpie. Seriously, they said on the forum that the hospital called Child Protective Services to report child abuse.
So, the hospital would have considered Male Genital Mutilation fine. But protecting a child from such genital mutilation was serious enough to require a report.
Circumcision is a $40,000,000,000.00 industry in the United States. Between the fees to the parent's insurance, the sale of the "donated" skin and the money paid for the one time circumcision kits it's big industry.
Much like tobacco, the circumcision industry is looking for new markets in other countries. As Americans stopped smoking, the tobacco industry started marketing their products in Asia with great success. Even with the billions they've paid in the US in lawsuits, they have more than made up for it in foreign sales.
The circumcision industry is doing the same. First, they are fighting back with industry paid for reports about "newly found" benefits to circumcision. Then, they are aggressively marketing VMMC (voluntary male medical circumcision) in Africa under the dubious claim supported by a study paid for by the company that makes the one time use circumcision device that HIV spread is 50% less likely from female to male during unprotected sex.
Then, they set a goal of 10,000,000 circumcision a year. Of course, they are falling far short of that goal, which gets local governments to pay for massive "public education" and for "Public Service Ads". Look up http://www.prepex.com Seriously, a more evil marketing scheme has never been created.
-
cutnbulls2ox (imported)
- Articles: 0
- Posts: 1521
- Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 3:01 am
-
Posting Rank
Re: Circumcisions taking more and more skin off down the penis shafts now ?
This video of the actual circumcisions looks like a health risk. All these teens and young men walking around with banded foreskins dying on their dicks as this device works. It looks like just pulling your pants down could dislodge the band on the penis and lead to half dead foreskins hanging on their penises. The infection potential looks high. Plus this device totally wastes all those foreskins by a long death that makes them useless for skin grafts or any other uses. Do they think black foreskins are less marketable than white foreskins ? That is sure a lot of rotting foreskins being wasted.
The whole video looks like a colonial era version of that grinning white woman extoling the virtues of cutting black dicks. Very creepy to have enthusiastic white women heading up black male penis mutilation programs. The appearance of racism and sexism in this program are obvious and blatent.
The horror stories of parents having to struggle to keep their own sons uncut really sounds like more of the fascist " it takes a village to raise children " garbage where the village is actually big brother government and big pharma drug companys and child protection joining up to illegally negate all parental rights. The village gets to make every decision on everyone else s kids regardless of what parents think. If there s money to be made cutting boys dicks, the government won t let parents get in the way of those kickbacks, bribes, and lobbying earnings from anyone making money off stolen foreskins. And who cares about the males dicks in government except to make money off them. .
The whole video looks like a colonial era version of that grinning white woman extoling the virtues of cutting black dicks. Very creepy to have enthusiastic white women heading up black male penis mutilation programs. The appearance of racism and sexism in this program are obvious and blatent.
The horror stories of parents having to struggle to keep their own sons uncut really sounds like more of the fascist " it takes a village to raise children " garbage where the village is actually big brother government and big pharma drug companys and child protection joining up to illegally negate all parental rights. The village gets to make every decision on everyone else s kids regardless of what parents think. If there s money to be made cutting boys dicks, the government won t let parents get in the way of those kickbacks, bribes, and lobbying earnings from anyone making money off stolen foreskins. And who cares about the males dicks in government except to make money off them. .