You know what that video screams? Don't let children make life decisions until they have grown up! And why on earth would a female have any say whatsoever in a male's circumcision.
If the woman can claim "my body, my choice" while killing someone else's unborn body, then I think we men can claim our bodies too. ..before she demands our mutilations. ..for her own satisfactions.
The most common circumcision malpractice is; too much skin is removed, this is my case. Where I live in Canada most men are intact.
Needless to say that I felt a shame of my self in the gym shower rooms. I have always been embarrassed showing my penis and the first girl I had sex with was horrified when she saw it and that has really hurt me. At the beginning, I never had any problem meeting girls but my relations have never lasted more than few days and I knew then that'd be like that for ever and that got me really depressed.
I for one one really don't remember my foreskin, it was removed 55 year ago when I probably a week or two old, so I really don't miss it. Would I want it back, not really. But then again guys who have the rest of their penis removed often can't remember what it is like to have a male penis. I think that I would miss my useless and worthless penis as much as I missed my foreskin......
TgEunuch (imported) wrote: Sun Jul 02, 2017 3:54 am
I for one one really don't remember my foreskin, it was removed 55 year ago when I probably a week or two old, so I really don't miss it. Would I want it back, not really. But then again guys who have the rest of their penis removed often can't remember what it is like to have a male penis. I think that I would miss my useless and worthless penis as much as I missed my foreskin......
I had a friend in junior high who was born without a lower right arm. Said he didn't miss it either.
Out of equality, should we check if our daughters want to be circumcised?
Or, as is the case for thousands of boys the world over, how about newborn baby girl circumcision? No anesthesia, too? Female frenulum be gone! After all, according to greedy doctors, ignorant nurses and pervert uncles, it's for better hygiene, to prevent masturbation and STDs, to back religious "freedom", to look like mom, to avoid being teased by envious classmates in the showers, and because boys prefer it. Yeah, because that would make it even easier to get her off, right? Oh, I see, it's to make her "last longer". So, logically, "the younger they are when cut, the better"? It's the hot porn look, you know. Yuck, the rest! Reproductively speaking, how is a woman's orgasm more important than a man's?
No wonder old, circed penises have a problem standing up. The glans is so dry and desensitized, it's probably like having a limp, boneless finger hanging down there.
Compare that to the physical sensitivity of your eyes, which is comparable to the natural glans. When you touch one of your eyes, what feels it the most, your finger or your eye? Cut guys try convincing me that "finger" is the answer. A natural glans feels the velvet soft, slick inside of a vagina as if it had tactile texture, while a permanently exposed glans barely feels the rough fabric it is rubbing against. So how is forced child prepuce theft not considered to be the psychopathic sexual crime it is? Actually, in most of the world, it is. For the rest, I guess: trauma. My condolences. If you ever feel low because of this, just know that your victimizer must have felt even lower.
Begoneboy (imported) wrote: Sat Jul 01, 2017 3:48 am
Can't help but to wonder if circumcision as a child comes out of the womb doesn't begin a life long process of
the desire for mutilation of ourselves. Having been circumcised at birth there was never an experience of not
being so. Circumcision was done for somebody else's convenience not the child's. The next step was to have
a vasectomy for somebody else's convenience (so the gal didn't need to take precautions). Although there is a
good argument of self protection from false accusation of impregnating somebody. And then the next logical
step in the chain of events would naturally be castration either chemically or surgically. That is after all exactly
what the feminist movement is all about. (de-masculinize society) in order that they can run it all the way they
see fit with men as slaves to women. Just all a thought of curiosity to be sure. I've certainly managed to go thru
all of the steps in the process. Only makes one wonder if that very first cutting without any choice of the patient
started a life long chain of events. Not that I'm placing blame on my life's decisions in any way. But it IS a thought.
I agree with a lot of what you say here. Us men do get pretty brutally modified and our sex organs cut at different ages to try to control or decrease our normal masculinity and sexual abilities. It is a big part of a lot of men s sexual experiences and life to get progressively cut n fixed as we age to make us less fertile n sexual as being normal for males to undergo. Castration and emasculation is the final outcome for some men.
Experiencing the intense pain of circumcision just after being born has to imprint a boy with cutting and intense pain as his very first sensations and awareness of his newborn sexual organs. That could easily last a lifetime and make cutting his sex organs again and again over life seem normal, ok, and part of being a male. Lots of men eagerly get vasectomies and later allow full castrations in later ages as expected, normal, and part of being a man and life. Seems us males are just born to be cut and emasculated more and more over time until desexed n nothing is left to cut off of us.
It d be great to see a study of vasectomies and castrations compared in circumcised and uncircumcised men and in different cultures that have more and fewer circumcised males.
I m betting the circumcised men get vasectomies and allow themselves to be fully castrated way more than uncut foreskinned men.
