Genital self-mutilation: there is no method in this madness

Post Reply
Hash (imported)
Articles: 0
Posts: 1678
Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2003 7:25 am

Posting Rank

Genital self-mutilation: there is no method in this madness

Post by Hash (imported) »

Another old article that made me think, but realize that doctors and psychiatrists typically think that anyone who removes their genitals is crazy. The reality is that yes, some people might have a mental illness and in a psychotic state mutilate their genitals. However, not all who "mutilate" are mentally ill, I'm not, I've seen several psychologists, but what about you? How do you know if you're actually mentally ill and or whether your constant cuttings, castration attempts, penis torture, sticking pins in them, excessive bandings, burnings, and or actual removal are sane/normal? Is this a judgment based on what is normal in the minds of psychiatrists? Have you ever evaluated what you're doing and if so, what have you concluded about yourself and your genital mutilation? Mutilation meaning to injure, disfigure, or make imperfect by removing or irreparably damaging parts.

Type and extent of GSM http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1 ... 0438.x/pdf

Some patients repeatedly practise GSM [18,39]; one boy started sequential GSM at the age of 6 years and by the age of 35 years, he had removed his testes, scrotum and penis [15]. His wife is reported to have remarked that with this completion, their life together would become more pleasant. While mutilation can be in¯icted by instrumentation [40], varying amounts of tissues have been amputated. Tattooing of the penis is practised in Western cultures among drug addicts and prison inmates [18]. Some erotic Japanese men implant plastic spherules under the skin of the penis to enhance sexual excitement in the partner [41]. The severest extent of GSM recorded is total amputation of the penis, scrotum and testes in the male [42,43]. The term `lock, stock and barrel' mutilation is suggested for such an extent, which occurs in <10% of cases of GSM [9]. The extent or severity of mutilation is similar between those considered psychotic and those not [9,17,18]. However, Nakaya found that self-mutilators with sexual con¯icts and guilt feelings were more likely to injure themselves more severely than those without [10]. In females, the injuries included third-degree perineal tears [12], gouging of the internal genitalia with ®ngernails [44], and vaginal mutilation with a hatpin and knitting needle [38]. Other instruments used in GSM include scissors [34], razor blades [22], an electric chainsaw [1], axe (hatchet) on a wooden block [15], a kitchen knife and saw [32], and a soup can lid [45].
stephaniesteve1 (imported)
Articles: 0
Posts: 139
Joined: Tue Aug 18, 2015 8:03 am

Posting Rank

Re: Genital self-mutilation: there is no method in this madness

Post by stephaniesteve1 (imported) »

I would say there is no madness in the method either.

I started doing things to my cock at about 7 years old and then started on my balls at around 10.I was experimenting with the different feelings i could generate from stretching,squashing,pricking the genitals. Some were not fun others were .In later life periods of sexual frustration tended to lead to self play,masturbation etc with minor GSM. The degree of damage has gone up over time as I found I could take more and more pain and get pleasure from it.It was only with the advent of the internet and the ability to view images of ladyboys , especially castrated ones that I set off down a route of castration.I just found the image of a ball-less male crutch was so appealing that I had to get rid of mine.I do not regard myself as mad ,psychotic etc, just a normal male who liked playing with his cock and balls in an experimental frame of mind.

Stephanie
feedback (imported)
Articles: 0
Posts: 205
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2009 8:14 am

Posting Rank

Re: Genital self-mutilation: there is no method in this madness

Post by feedback (imported) »

stephaniesteve1 (imported) wrote: Thu Oct 13, 2016 2:30 am I would say there is no madness in the method either.

I started doing things to my cock at about 7 years old and then started on my balls at around 10.I was experimenting with the different feelings i could generate from stretching,squashing,pricking the genitals. Some were not fun others were .In later life periods of sexual frustration tended to lead to self play,masturbation etc with minor GSM. The degree of damage has gone up over time as I found I could take more and more pain and get pleasure from it.It was only with the advent of the internet and the ability to view images of ladyboys , especially castrated ones that I set off down a route of castration.I just found the image of a ball-less male crutch was so appealing that I had to get rid of mine.I do not regard myself as mad ,psychotic etc, just a normal male who liked playing with his cock and balls in an experimental frame of mind.

Stephanie

I consider myself very normal in ever other way, but I would love to lose my balls and have damaged them and my cock till they are useless and should be removed. Seeing a shrink in the new year toward that end.
Scuba Cuba (imported)
Articles: 0
Posts: 105
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2015 1:57 pm

Posting Rank

Re: Genital self-mutilation: there is no method in this madness

Post by Scuba Cuba (imported) »

I've always wanted to castrate myself rather than by third party. As previous thread I have practiced how I would complete this
Post Reply

Return to “Eunuch Central”